Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3509856 times)

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #705 on: December 13, 2010, 07:13:28 PM »
Hey IWD

I appreciate what you said. =]

I just believe that this needs to be investigated. I cant let it go stone unturned.  Im working on this a bit more in the sim to get most all parts for build as close to what is available.   

I see that they are peaks. I see that if we had a large chart, that the 12w(at peak of ramp, not full cycle) vs the out peak, I think things will become more realistic to you.  Like the input ramp, average that from 0 to 12, thats 6 w continuous.
1k peaks, I find it hard to believe that even the spaces in between the out spikes, at 6w continuous, can equal over that period of time, the spike energy as a whole.

Lets say all in all, from 6w in, that from the spikes, we can generate 12w continuous, would that sound more reasonable?
8w out?   6.23995w out?

Now take the sim code above and get the pri and sec resonating!  hmmm  will that fill those gaps?   

Have a bit of faith   Some here have it and some dont.    But no stone unturned.  k   =]

And I can use all the help I can get or even fresh ideas to try.


Mags

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #706 on: December 14, 2010, 02:30:02 PM »

I see that they are peaks.

Actually that is what I had seen. Spikes going off the scope even at 5vdc and 10x setting and now way to pan up or down enough. lol

I am so glad you tried that. Can you post an image?
I never used a sim.
Don't even know how they work. lol
Only a build and my scope. I saw spikes.

So listen to this.

The ozone patent could have pulsed 5 primary working circuits, and at the ohmage each was at, they would have all felt the damped pulse just as hard. lol


CodeWebs

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #707 on: December 14, 2010, 06:58:33 PM »
Wasn't sure where to post this since all the boards got moved around.  I found this paper really thought provoking though: http://nema-uqd.info/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/On_the_Principles_of_Permissible_Overunity_EM_Power_Systems.21335329.pdf

Thaelin

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1093
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #708 on: December 20, 2010, 06:16:22 PM »
   With all the sim work going on here, there is one part of
the puzzle that has never been addressed. Frequency harmonics.
Its a known fact that if you tamper with the Vars, they disappear
right in front of your eyes. What about the 3'rd harmonic or say
the 5th? These two create havoc hell in power systems if not
tended to.
   The site on inductive heating shows a working coil of large size
and states it has "very high" circulating current. Tamper with that
and you put an extra load on the input. Would the harmonics do
that?  One way to find out I guess. Hmmm?

thay

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #709 on: February 02, 2011, 06:53:31 AM »
Well, I found the need to get down to some basic Tesla. I think everyone should build a tesla coil once in their journey through the search for OU. It can teach you things through experience with it that you may never understand, and it also can get you to come up with some interesting questions along the way.

Like, what is the mechanism that determines the voltage across each winding primary vs secondary?  500v per turn, primary and secondary?  Why is that? What is the link that causes this equal volt per turn of the primary and secondary? How are the windings individualized amongst one another in that they seen to all find harmony at the same voltage per turn?  questions, questions.

I am posting some pics of what I have tinkered with lately, showing some things that I have seen but not yet able to do until I built the mini TC. The secondary is 6in tall, about 200 turns of 30awg  radioshack mag wire, and the primary is 2 turns of copper tubing, about 18awg. Discharge caps are Radioshack also, along with the 1kv diodes(2 in series in each leg, and the blue caps are 1kv 560pf in series with the mini neon transformer to limit how much gets to the discharge caps over time as it keeps the neon board happy and cool.

I tried a couple different low no. of turn primaries, even 1 turn, which consists of a piece of 2in copper pipe with  a slot cut in it. Worked pretty good considering the mass of copper and 1 turn.  2 turns is the highest so far as it in itself, is equivalent to a bifi coil where each of the 2 adjacent turns are 50% of the total voltage potential difference from each other.  I thought that was cool. 

Ok, I am going to post some pics, I dont know if I can get them all on tonight, but Ill do my best, and if not Ill get them up tomorrow.

Mags


nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #710 on: February 02, 2011, 04:37:43 PM »
Good job!

Is the pvc a 1/2 inch?
Also could you post a schematic of the connections?

Jesus

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #711 on: February 02, 2011, 06:56:21 PM »
Hey Niev   Thanks  ;]

It is 1in pvc.

The light bulb on top is 1 turn aluminum tubing.  When I was lighting the other larger bulb, 4w 120v, using one wire from the secondary and my finger as the other connection, I found that it lit brighter on the end closer to the primary.

Gotta get back to work, lunch is over. =]

Mags

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #712 on: February 02, 2011, 07:21:41 PM »
Mags
WOW!!
Buddy you have skills [guess thats why you make the "Big Bucks":}
Thought you'd like to see this,
User Darkspeed
from here
http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=534.msg10316;topicseen#msg10316

Quote:
I started doing more experiments into the operation of a looped tesla transformer.
Imagine a conventional tesla coil where a unit of energy moves up and down the height of the coil like a bouncing ball.
Now bend that coil into a circle so the two ends meet and there is no longer a end to reflect that packet of energy, it is allowed to travel a complete circle.
I built a number of these but while they did function as a amazing display of sparks they would not spin a compass.
My biggest mistake was in thinking they needed to be high frequency, i was leaking power everywhere.
So I needed to slow down the transit time ( RF )
In a conventional tesla transformer this is done with a top load capacity or the addition of a ground at the base.
But this was a loop with a given wire length, so the next obvious choice was adding inductance.
Soft iron wire is a good choice for adding the required inductance to slow down the transit time.
I took a short, wide pvc former and wrapped it with a number of turns of soft iron wire in a single layer fashion.
The number of turns and the proximity to the tesla secondary allowed me to adjust the inductance.
It is a delicate balance between too little inductance and building a heater.
Two interesting things happened.
First I was able to bring the frequency down to a point that I was no longer wasting energy in transmission or discharges, so the packet of energy on its return trip was additive to the next impulse from the tesla primary. Delicate precise pulses adding over a period of time from a low power source.
Great levels of energy can be achieved this way before breakdown occurs.
The second was that i was now moving a magnetic node and antinode around the loop of soft iron wire in relationship to the node and antinode in the tesla secondary. A compass is useful in viewing this up to a point.
Laying a single loop of multi strand wire on top of the soft iron wire inside the tesla secondary produced some interesting results as well.
So for example if I was moving a induced magnetic field around in a circle at 6000 cycles per second and I put a wire in this path so as to drag this magnetic current down the length of this wire, it would be analogous of a generator passing a winding at 360,000 rpm. The result is very high voltage pulsed dc from a short low resistance wire.
----------------------
He's busy getting his bench back up to speed
After a move.

Chet


Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #713 on: February 02, 2011, 07:34:43 PM »
Hey Bud

I relied to the ebike thread, maybe didnt see.  ;]

Very cool stuff.  Ill check out the site tonight. Any pic over there?


Back later  ;]

and its good to be back in action.

Mags

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #714 on: February 03, 2011, 02:35:14 AM »
Hi everyone, hope everyone is fine and cong hei fat soy  ;D
 
I just discovered something which is very natural and no need to use pump.
and i  am here again to share this rediscovery.

i will put some attachment on how can we make water freely flow without using any pump. What we only need to do is the starting point ok .

THE POINT IS WE CAN CONVERT THE TECHNOLOGY INTO ELECTRICITY!

Here they are:

  The siphoning Technology

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sa_440OaQxE&feature=player_embedded#

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #715 on: February 03, 2011, 02:47:41 AM »
Teets!    cong hei fat soy to you also!  ;]

Hows tings?

The problem with the idea you posted is that the water on the lower has to be brought back up to the source container.

A wick system?  Can we raise the lower water to the top container and use less energy squeezing it out at the top than what the water produced flowing down?   hmm. 

Good to see ya around.  =]

Mags

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #716 on: February 03, 2011, 03:03:42 AM »
Teets!    cong hei fat soy to you also!  ;]

Hows tings?

The problem with the idea you posted is that the water on the lower has to be brought back up to the source container.

A wick system?  Can we raise the lower water to the top container and use less energy squeezing it out at the top than what the water produced flowing down?   hmm. 

Good to see ya around.  =]

Mags

no mags

THINK BIG

It is the nature that will sustain itself, we only need some part of it, all we need is a falling action or a momentum action buddy,  it will work contineously forever ;)

in continuation with that, i also rediscover that electricity has also sucking and pushing ability wherein it is what we need to make it work contineously.

And this really is a free energy!

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #717 on: February 03, 2011, 03:05:46 AM »



                    Teetsla the Plumber!
                            -> ;D<-
                              Chet

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #718 on: February 03, 2011, 03:09:43 AM »
Ohhh   The second blue diagram with the larger width pipe above the upper bucket, does it contain more weight in water than the thinner vertical pipe?   And that is the part that brings he water back to the top?  =]

Magsy

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #719 on: February 03, 2011, 03:11:28 AM »
Thank you @magluvin!

Those 25khz, are they from an ac source or a dc circuit?

Jesus