Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION  (Read 3189283 times)

Offline Cadman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4605 on: February 25, 2014, 08:31:42 PM »
@Google

Enough with the OU is impossible. Technically that's almost a given. I say almost because I do not believe it is ultimately impossible. That being said there is no reason not to pursue free energy. Notice there is a difference, free energy is energy obtained at no cost other than the equipment needed to collect it. I have a free energy device. It collects ambient energy. I have another one that is magnet powered. The only problem I have is I can't collect it fast enough, solar is faster, but I am working on a more promising one.

As far as your dis of Tito, everything he has shown and hinted about boils down to super efficient use and recycling of energy. A lot can be done with that. If you can get 1 amp to do the work of 4 amps, is that not energy amplification? And if you can collect that 1 amp for free then isn't that OU? For all practical purposes it is.



Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4606 on: February 25, 2014, 08:31:43 PM »
Some people here have a very high "chronic bullshitting co-efficient", which is repeated in cycles on all threads, be it TPU, newman motor or any other thread.

Dunno which shanty they live in but surely have access to internet.

Look at this


http://www.overunity.com/5975/stefan-and-newman-motor/nowap/#.UwzwZn1X7MI

Best,

Offline bbem

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4607 on: February 25, 2014, 09:31:14 PM »
@Loner,
Your test reminds me of prof.Turtur's test  ;)
http://www.psiram.com/en/index.php/Claus_Wilhelm_Turtur

Offline totoalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4608 on: February 25, 2014, 09:40:26 PM »
http://www.overunity.com/5975/stefan-and-newman-motor/msg142209/#msg142209
Can somebody repost Nieves Oliveras circuit similar to Tito but with parts ......
Ive tested with ordinary relays on Eric set up one 1s 12 v 7 ah  the other side   one  1.2 v  and  9v   7ah batteries  and the v easily  rise to 16 v from the 2 series batteries the relay is consuming  50 mA  but unstable due to gap in the contact which is adjusted by neo magnets only
Now its time for titos circuit to rain >:(   shine 8) or dump  :'(
totoalas
 

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4609 on: February 25, 2014, 09:42:33 PM »
Hi Loner,

Thanks for the post. I am certainly not the disinfo type. But I dont really know what is meant by EE type. I am from the part of the world where there is energy scarcity in rural areas and people in some villages have even seen light bulbs, where as in urban areas we have excess cheap energy. Electricity costs us 10 cents per kwh. And gasoline is $ 1.2 per litre. Diesel is $ 1.00 per litre.

We have no men in black or suppression in our country. We are one of the largest economies of the world after US and China.

We are in top 5 automobile producing countries in the world and number one in motorcycle production in the world.

Well, I am of the opinion that free energy philosophers like Moray B King and others should spend some time in the rigourous research and produce a working model based on their theories. Otherwise they are just promoting their books, CDs and DVDs.

I am aware of the work by Turtur which is similar to what you mentioned. But again he is also all theories and no research.

Yes there may be some still unidentified energy forms. But where is the research. Where is one single working model.

I am talking of only one watt extra. Just one fuc*** watt.... not more.

Can anyone add some value.

Best,

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4610 on: February 25, 2014, 09:59:10 PM »
Hi cadman,

We already have renewable energy, i.e.,  solar, wind, sea waves, ambient etc. But these are renewable energy souces and we are all aware of it. Jes Ascanius has made some 90 watts from ambient energy circuits, I read somewhere. These are all open systems.

What I am referring to is the overunity as in a self looped , self running, self powered... mechanical, electrical, magnetic, electromagnetic, electronic or a combination of these. These are all closed systems.

Even telluric current is an open system. Just leave the open systems aside.

What these guys are misguiding you is about overunity in closed systems.

By the way we already have 99% efficient motors.

I hope I made myself clear.

Best,

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4044
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4611 on: February 25, 2014, 10:08:49 PM »
this thread is going into bulshit direction and you know why >:(  wake up

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4612 on: February 25, 2014, 10:29:59 PM »
@forest,

Ever heard of "gigo" ? Garbage in - garbage out. This thread was started by the biggest bullshitter on this forum.

And what do you mean by wake up ?  Only sleeping can wake up, people sleeping with open eyes cant be woken up.

By the way, your post is mildly offensive also.

Instead of answering my one watt overunity challenge, you are eschewing the way. Not very constructive way of handling the things, I must say. No offence meant.

Best

Offline Cadman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4613 on: February 25, 2014, 10:57:14 PM »
Talk about BS.. you are defining a self limiting scenario
Quote
What I am referring to is the overunity as in a self looped , self running, self powered... mechanical, electrical, magnetic, electromagnetic, electronic or a combination of these. These are all closed systems.
although you are wrong about the magnetic. Tell me, how are you going to self loop a magnet motor? A magnet motor is self running and self powered by definition.

Of course we can use an open system!



Offline Cadman

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4615 on: February 26, 2014, 01:12:37 AM »
@forest

You may have something with your thoughts about caps. All this crap started right after your posts.

Whew, they are just popping out of the woodwork aren't they. Talk about relentless.


Offline Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4616 on: February 26, 2014, 01:32:58 AM »
" There is no conspiracy from the governments "


I ran that one by world renowned psychic Clara Voyant.

According to Clara, the spirits of JFK, RFK, MLK, and John Lennon all came through at the same time.

The only words she was able to make out above much laughter, snorting, and what sounded like knee slapping, was, they wanted to hear why Building 7 collapsed.

Regards...



Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4617 on: February 26, 2014, 03:47:30 AM »
@ Loner,

I am a scientist and fortunately without blinkers on my eyes. I am open to breaking old laws of Physics. I am all for dicovering new hitherto unknown sources of energy.

Yes there is something really weird caps behave at times, I watched Eric's video on his Corolla twice and noted his words that even when the alternator of the car had popped out, he was able to run his car on his 12 /24 volt magic box converter and the tuning fork thingy from world war 2 and the tuning fork will keep on humming for next 5 minutes even after swiching off the magic box.

I believe Eric and his words. The guy has no axe to grind.

There are some patents by one OSAMU IDE on a related thing.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/u5jb2bveg9bbhq7/Osamu%20Ide%20-%20Increased%20voltage%20phenomenon%20in%20a%20resonance%20circuit%20of%20unconventional%20magnetic%20configuration.pdf 

AND

http://www.rexresearch.com/ide/ide.htm

You appreciate its an open source forum and people here are from world over and here to share ideas about alternate energy. People join the forum, solve their problems by discussing with other members and when they have something partly working, they either start behaving like school kids or open their own forums where memberships are on a paid monthly basis. Now thats called leeching. Greedy by nature.

Others start milking gullible delusional investors. Mr Wayne here is a good example on this forum.

You can not make money from free energy circuits. Offer them open source if you think you have something viable. Let the whole mankind benefit from it.

Stop playing hide and seek games with forum members who have solved your problems and guided you in making something viable.

What happened to Ismail Aviso. Another thing of past and will be forgotten after sometime.

Its the greed to become a millionaire overnight that keeps mankind suffering. A free energy open sourcing inventor will always be welcomed and treated like a king, anywhere they go on the planet.

So the crux is, share if you have something, let others improve upon it and open source the technology. Or else get the fuc# outta here and mind your own business.

Peer review and replication is very much required here as well.

At least thats how I see it.

Best






Offline Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5886
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4618 on: February 26, 2014, 03:49:28 AM »


This is all almost enough to convince me that something stated on this thread has actually caught the attention of unwanted parties.  It is certainly enough to force me to re-read the last hundred or so posts just to see what that might have been stated.  If I miss it, I'm certain someone else will see what it was and we will all learn something, at least.  I, myself, cannot be certain this effect was from this thread.  Remember, misdirection is one heck of a tool.

Ive been there and felt that way a few times. Not just this thread.

Ive also gotten uncomfortable a few times, when I was doing a LOT of thinking and posting here, where Tito would bring up some new idea to the table in the middle of a particular subject/project/experiment I would be working on. I would get angry at times because of it. ::) Was just thinking about it recently.  One time was when I made the little Tesla coil. When the subject change came is when I had shown using a 1 turn loop at the top of the TC secondary, lighting a 12v mini bulb. So now I wonder if there is anything to it, as in, if we have that long single layer coil, with the primary at one end, and the pickup at the other end, does the loading of the pickup affect the input to the primary. ??? I sorta put it off as possibly nothing back then, as I was able to light the same bulb directly off of the 1kv neon inverter that was charging the discharge caps, and much brighter. But I may need to set that up again. Still have it.

Anyway, No offense Teets.  That was then, this is now. ;)   If there is anything I can recall that 'may' have been of some importance towards our goal, Ill post them.

Another thing I may not have done right when doing some experiments, was using a bifi as a primary.  The idea back then was to have a  rod core(ferrite), and wind a secondary first onto the core. Add a few layers of electrical tape on top of the sec winding for spacing, or what ever, masking tape works good too. Then wind the bifi primary onto the tape.

The idea was that when the bifi was given input, its field is attracted to the core, and the field induces the secondary along the way. But when the secondary(loaded) field, is mostly put to the core, rather than influencing the primary. ??? Ive been thinking on that a lot also.

If anyone wishes to try these things, please do.  Been getting cars ready for the Amelia island car show next week. Just had a big show a couple weeks ago. Lost of prep. Im going to wind a ferrite later this evening. Nothing big. But I need to do some further test on that. Its bothering me. ;)

Mags

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: ENERGY AMPLIFICATION
« Reply #4619 on: February 26, 2014, 04:17:50 AM »
@ Loner,

I am a scientist and fortunately without blinkers on my eyes. I am open to breaking old laws of Physics. I am all for dicovering new hitherto unknown sources of energy.

Yes there is something really weird caps behave at times, I watched Eric's video on his Corolla twice and noted his words that even when the alternator of the car had popped out, he was able to run his car on his 12 /24 volt magic box converter and the tuning fork thingy from world war 2 and the tuning fork will keep on humming for next 5 minutes even after swiching off the magic box. He also mentioned that the key is to quick charge and discharge the caps, 100s of cycles per second. And the tuning fork was able to do it by minimising losses,  because the thing hummed at a particular resonant frequency that required only a miniscule energy to maintain its amplitude.

Now does this ring any bells in your head ? Did the thing use EMF to keep ringing without using much current at the resonant frequency.

But from where the extra energy came from, that still kept the batteries charged, even without a working alternator.
I believe Eric and his words. The guy has no axe to grind.

There are some patents by one OSAMU IDE on a related thing.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/u5jb2bveg9bbhq7/Osamu%20Ide%20-%20Increased%20voltage%20phenomenon%20in%20a%20resonance%20circuit%20of%20unconventional%20magnetic%20configuration.pdf 

AND

http://www.rexresearch.com/ide/ide.htm

You appreciate its an open source forum and people here are from world over and here to share ideas about alternate energy. People join the forum, solve their problems by discussing with other members and when they have something partly working, they either start behaving like school kids or open their own forums where memberships are on a paid monthly basis. Now thats called leeching. Greedy by nature.

Others start milking gullible delusional investors. Mr Wayne here is a good example on this forum.

You can not make money from free energy circuits. Offer them open source if you think you have something viable. Let the whole mankind benefit from it.

Stop playing hide and seek games with forum members who have solved your problems and guided you in making something viable.

What happened to Ismail Aviso. Another thing of past and will be forgotten after sometime.

Its the greed to become a millionaire overnight that keeps mankind suffering. A free energy open sourcing inventor will always be welcomed and treated like a king, anywhere they go on the planet.

So the crux is, share if you have something, let others improve upon it and open source the technology. Or else get the fuc# outta here and mind your own business.

Peer review and replication is very much required here as well.

At least thats how I see it.

Best