We can't read that .3GP file.  Any ideas?

I converted it to wmv for the other users...

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=view;down=449

Enjoy,
~Dingus Mungus

Programming mostly... And teaching myself to work with micro-controllers. After I realized I wasn't smart enough to do the ARM3 programming for the TPU stuff and ran out ideas for the HHO reactor design, I kinda buggered off and went back in to training and werking on my career. I got a good job, and am in a semi permanent residence so I might be doing some new research again and lending a hand where I can. Mean time I'll be lurking as always.

Thanks for file conversion. More films can viewed on YT. We offer DRJ200 already from V2009, but officialy only from V2010, 90 birthday of K. Wojtyla (JP2). All in all this and other more powerful CF machines could go over water thanks his paceful work to the World. And to make this work life, the knowledge about this more powerful nuclear engines was given for free to Russia, for hands our good neighbor V. V. This should improve strategic imbalance between superpowers of which was little known, for KGB too.        Aber, zuruck nach DRJ.               The serie is basing on small engines uses same workhead. It can be cheap built in serie, much cheaper as per hand craft. It can also accomodate engines between 5.5 to 11 kW. By 10 hours of cheap, night electricity which cost in Poland 8 ec/1 kWh each unit can produce heat for: 5.5=280m2 7.5=400 m2 11>600 m2. It is by 250W/1m2 home insulation. By new of 55W it is over 4x more of place to heat. In kW of warmth it is respectively: 7/7.7  9.8/10.8  15.5/17 The last dates are after workhead insulation to 99%. Normally, without isolation, first values for effective heat are. Electricity power consumption: 7.5  9.9 14.9  In Amps its: 12 16 24          Each engine runs at 75% of nominal power, but real eff. for electrical motors is not very over 50%. The first Siemens progressive motor serie had better values, but You know, crises:-( For example   real mechanical power to heat conversion is for 11 kW =205% For bigger engines over 22 kW it is even more. It rises slowly with power.     When electrical engines producers will alredy making as written 90% eff. work, it can be total 200% to be. Aber Papier and Internet hat Zeit... By small serie of production units cost is: 5.5/7.5 2600 Eur  11=3100 Individually it costs +30% Fe. 18 kW which produces 31 kW of heat =9000 E. It is even cheaper to buy 2x11 units + steering for 1000 to have power of 18 kW 1800E. cheaper!               DRJ1000. 11 will cost probably 13.000 E. It can produce 》110 kW heat.          DRJ200.5 is not very good really. It is cos of small power, very water quality gently. It can have not enough power to break water continuity and consume more electricity as specified.  7.5 is an equivalent to 34 kW gas burning machine, 11 equals 56 kW installed power of gas machinery.                                   Real economy as for Poland. Coal 26.000 KJ =190 E./1 T it is to 3 times cheaper. By gas of 0.45 E. it is over 2x cheaper. By day price of electricity of 0.13E. it is only 25% over gas and 2x times over coal.     To make it all run properly, you have 2 x 300L bottle for proper heat production to heave.

Hi Dr. Nowak,
is it something simular to a Griggs pump where the overunity energy is coming from
the sonic fusion where water bubbles are collapsing ?

So the output of your machine is pure hot steam
and then you use it to heat water with it in a room radiator heater?

Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.

So build it for yourself, why not?                                                  Mr Grigs has really no knowledge about cold nuclear fusion, if fusion generely. He had done sthg by occasion (same was for Potapov). You can clearly read in my bio, that all my inventions and theories were born between 1969 (mein erste Besuch im Berlin) und 1972. I knew that it all had to be studied already for previous War (Krieg) needs. And when than and today, The Science says and knows nothing about gravity......        Gravity (time shifting for various purposes) was main gear for "Star Wars", not lasers and so on, as was said publicity. But works go on, and soon all Humanity will see effects.   DRJ1000.11 can produce compressed steam too. It^s about 100 kG/1H. Atomic reactor with same power can only 1/10 of this volume to produce.      For home heating it needs not to produce steam, hot water only as DRJ200. Between this 2 generations is 7 times efectivity difference. So we need sthg. between it.

Typische polnische Hure. Wer aber mochtete was mit solche zu machen, frage mich oft? Auf Strassen Strich bessere sind. Und kluger zudem!

@Pix,

This is good thing. I guess Dr. Nowak has trouble communicating due to linguistic
differences.

First, like Stephan said, this is a Griggs Pump unit. You can have a Griggs pump
built in the U.S., but that company won't guarantee its long term performance.
That's the problem. Just heating water mechanically does not need to be an
overunity process. Unless the manufacturer can guarantee that it is an overunity
process, it won't do you/me any good because it will still heat water underunity.
So if you say that "it is not working" and the company will say that "it is working",
because they feel they can't give a written guarantee of overunity performance
without also giving a scientific explanation of how it works.

The Griggs pump heats water partially via cavitation/cold fusion, using natural
deuterium fuel from the feed water. This is cold fusion - a nuclear process.
Inside of the pump the Griggs rotor actually lights up due to plasma cavitation.
Contaminants probably result in the unit not behaving so nicely in the nuclear
regime.

Because of the way this works - it's product is thermal energy gain. So the VAT
wind turbine thing is nothing more than an initial energy source to spin the Griggs
rotor. Then, when the thing heats your entire house you have assurance of energy
gain. :-)

The next problem is guaranteeing that Griggs pump is actually generating overunity
energy because the way they have the demo set up seems to count on running the
same heated fluid thought the pump again and again. So whether it is overunity or
not the heated water will be processed again and again through the accumulator
tank. Therefore, except for the time factor, the water in the accumulator is going
to go through the same set of temperature points whether it's overunity gain or not -
just in different timeframes. Most likely the output is will end up becoming steam.

The way they handle this in Eastern Europe is to add an industrial calculating controller
that measures the difference between input vs output temperature of the pump
per unit time and so they have instrumentation tell them whether it has overunity
heat gain or not, based in calculations. Not exactly a great way to prove anything.

Unless you need hot water, you are going to have the next problem which is
the efficiency of Carnot heat engines is only going to be about 33% or less.
Therefore the Griggs pump gain is going to need 300% gain per pass to compensate
and more passes takes more energy, so having a closed loop to prove anything,
when the output is heat energy is going to be tough.

Because of all these proof problems, the Griggs pump is not my favorite
vehicle for delivering cold fusion energy gain, even though it is an economical
implementation, if it does work. So you need an organization that has the
guts to stand behind a particular explanation of how it works. So over time
they will just get better and better at doing this and showing that it works.
 
:S:MarkSCoffman