Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!  (Read 175714 times)

Offline PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #135 on: February 27, 2009, 01:02:06 AM »

Hi  PaulLowrance

that's a big clam
NO one here has OU   Do you ???? I do not see it

where is your device

cat

BTW, yes to that question. For over one year I've had the first documented and properly tested "free energy" machine that includes the extreme details, including part #'s, to build. It's not going to power anything useful, but you all may know it to be my diode array. Someone who's first name starts with a "T" dragged me away from my magnetic research over two years ago when I was just months away from building my first magnetic based "free energy" machine. Mr. "T" asked me to test his diode array. I replied, but didn't answer his question because I did not want to get caught up in diode research.  He asked again. I ignored. He asked 3rd time, and I finally gave in, and the rest is history. It was all a waste of time with the exception that I have undeniable proof that 2LoT is a tendency, not a law!

Make no mistake. My diode research is the thing of the past, and I *will* have a self-running machine that produces usable amounts of power by the end of this year. The mathematics is from well-established conventional physics. It is very clear. It matches my magnetic theory. I took my magnetic theory, made a design in FEMM, ran the sim, and FEMM numbers came back in agreement with my magnetic theory. It will work!

Was I bamboozled?  I have my own opinion about that. It's funny the perfect timing these people have. What's hilarious is that I am now *LITERALLY* being bombarded with people begging me to help them out in their stuff. Please Give Up People!  Not Going To Happen!!

You legit posters have no clue what's happening behind the scenes. A lot of these people you think are your friends are here to pull the wool over your eyes, to misguide you. Sorry if that hurts, but I speak my mind.

So why am I still posting here. The same reason I've always come here. To find legit people ... while I run my numerical analysis simulations in the background, LOL

Global Free Energy in 2009!

PL

p.s., Please copy all of the pages at my website. You may need them in a few months. Please! If by infinitesimal chance I don't make it over the next few months, then it's up to all of you folks. I don't know why, but all of a sudden today the router has been under a heavy attack, and just broke through. My ZoneAlarm is now giving me warnings every 30 seconds or so. Since 1997 I've been a SA on unix servers, so I know a thing or two about PC & Internet security.

Offline Magnethos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 521
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #136 on: February 27, 2009, 01:19:18 AM »
Congratulations PL, but we need to develop more devices and techniques.

Video showing how the device works
http://video.google.es/videoplay?docid=47082727717444502&hl=es
« Last Edit: February 27, 2009, 11:48:55 AM by Magnethos »

Offline Magnethos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 521
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #137 on: February 27, 2009, 12:06:24 PM »
Some calculations to determine the COP.

Information Needed to determine the COP:
Example 1-> 250 Volts, 3000 microfarads, 1 MHz. The battery can be a simple 1.5 Volt battery. But in that case we need to add a voltage multiplier or a transformer to increase from 1.5 to 250 V and charge the caps.

1) Capacitor Voltage: 250 Volts
2) Capacitor Farads: 3000 microfarads = 0.003 Farads
3) Switching Time: 1.000.000 Hz = 0,000001 secs

Q = C x V                  Q = 0.003 x 250 =  0.75 C
W = (Q x V) / 2          W = 0.75 x 250 =  93.75 J
P = W / T..... T = W / P

Can the device run a 50,000 Watt device?
T = W / P                 T = 93.75 / 50.000 = 0,001875 secs

We can pulse the battery up to 0,000001 secs
0,001875 secs < 0,000001 secs  so we can run a 50.000 Watt device using the battery.
The maximum energy using this configuration (250V@3000 microfarads, 1 Mhz, 1 AA battery) is around 75.000 Watt.

I'm not 100% sure, but I think the calculations are correct.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2009, 04:03:41 PM by Magnethos »

Offline PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #138 on: February 27, 2009, 04:05:54 PM »
Magnethos,

What I'm doing is using well-established mathematical equations from conventional physics. I have no clue what you all of your numbers come from, or what theory it is based on, but in your video you talk about energy from the vacuum.

People should know the difference -->

1. My quest is to capture ambient thermal energy that exists in all matter, all the time. I've used a well established magnetics software, FEMM, that uses well established conventional physics that shows my designs have a gain in energy per cycle.

2. Your quest is to capture energy from the vacuum. There is no conventional mathematics that shows how this is possible.

So my research is no longer a theory, as it is based on well established conventional physics mathematics.

PL
« Last Edit: February 27, 2009, 04:27:31 PM by PaulLowrance »

Offline Magnethos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 521
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #139 on: February 27, 2009, 04:25:16 PM »
Paul,
I'm very surprised and happy that anyone (you) have developed a free energy, overunity... call it as you want, energy device. That is a very good news for all the entire community. I'm waiting to see the tests of your device in the next months.

The theory is about the relaxation time constant in a conductor. That theory is well stablished in conventional physics, maybe a little uncommon but that theory is explained in common physics.

In the project, I'm showing a way to extract pure voltage from the battery. Again, this "advantage" is based in the Relaxation Time theory, based in common physics. We know if we don't extract current from the battery, we will have an unlimited source of energy. Of course, there is a degradation of the battery in the Years, but we can replace the battery each 3 or 4 years and the problem will be resolved.

The voltage in a battery is infinite. So, I think the dipole is getting potential continously from somewhere and I think the potential comes from the vacuum. Maybe the potential comes from another source. But we know the voltage in a battery is infinite and we can extract all the voltage we want from the dipole without discharging the battery.

This quest is to capture pure voltage from the battery, not directly from the vacuum.

Offline PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #140 on: February 27, 2009, 04:38:38 PM »
The theory is about the relaxation time constant in a conductor. That theory is well stablished in conventional physics, maybe a little uncommon but that theory is explained in common physics.

In the project, I'm showing a way to extract pure voltage from the battery. Again, this "advantage" is based in the Relaxation Time theory, based in common physics. We know if we don't extract current from the battery, we will have an unlimited source of energy. Of course, there is a degradation of the battery in the Years, but we can replace the battery each 3 or 4 years and the problem will be resolved.

The voltage in a battery is infinite. So, I think the dipole is getting potential continously from somewhere and I think the potential comes from the vacuum. Maybe the potential comes from another source. But we know the voltage in a battery is infinite and we can extract all the voltage we want from the dipole without discharging the battery.

This quest is to capture pure voltage from the battery, not directly from the vacuum.

That's fine and good, but please see this from my point of view. Every time I post my research it seems that somehow it gets distracted. I'm using conventional mathematics the entire way in the entire step-by-step process for my design. FEMM is doing every step of my machine for the entire cycle, as the current increases, etc. etc., FEMM is considering everything, and the end results in FEMM shows extra energy. Can you show the same?  FEMM also does electric problems. Yes, relaxation is conventional physics, but that's light years away from covering all of your claims in your theory. You would need to go over every step in extreme detail using a numerical mathematical analysis software to see the results.

My point is, why have people work on an unproven theory when my research is complete, entirely based on conventional physics, and verified by one of the most well-established magnetics software, FEMM. Why would you say to everyone --> "Congratulations PL, but we need to develop more devices and techniques." I have taken my research as far as it can go in terms of conventional physics. Why have everyone start working on an unproven theory when I have already competed my research. It's now only a matter of time to tweak my Free Energy design #3 so the energy gain per cycle is greater than the losses in transistors and wire resistance.

PL

Offline Magnethos

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 521
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #141 on: February 27, 2009, 04:48:32 PM »
Paul,
All the theory you have explained it's correct, in theory. I think my theory or pseudo-theory it's correct too. But I think you haven't built the device yet. And I haven't built "my" device neither.

Nature hasn't read our physics text books. She can't adapt to us, we must adapt to her.
So the best thing we can do is to build our devices and test and see what really happens. Maybe we're discussing 2 big solutions and we're spending too much time discussing if your or my theory are ok or not.

So, as God said. Go and turn your words into facts. I will do it too.

Offline PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #142 on: February 27, 2009, 05:11:26 PM »
I've verified the popular and well-established magnetics software, FEMM, with real measurements. So far it has been very accurate. Perhaps that's why it's called "conventional physics," because it's been heavily tested for decades under various conditions and proven to be accurate so far.

So a theory is not a theory. Some theories are rock solid to date-- conventional physics. Also, there's a big difference between writing down a lot of mathematics on paper, and using a well established numerical mathematical analysis software such as FEMM. Tom Bearden has tons of paper mathematics, and my hats off to Tom for trying, but that's not so impressive because it's untested. FEMM, on the other hand, is well tested.

Posting here is not always a waste of time. As I have FEMM sims running in the background, sometimes I'll come here in hopes that as many people as possible will copy my website that contains my designs and science. Nobody lives forever. If something happened to me, then I just cross my fingers *someone* will take my research to the final remaining few yards. So close!!!

PL

Offline newton2

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #143 on: February 27, 2009, 05:54:36 PM »
Hello Honoured Profiles and The Honoured Administrator of This The Honourable OU-Forum !
I am NOT a Physics Leviathan arising with my Elder Times Chalkboard & Formulas Pergament Rolls for to shout against NewTimes Novel Ideas.......though I kindly have to write this brief Comment :

##If present is a Serially connected Circuit of an IDEAL REGULAR PROPERTIES TYPES COIL ,
of an IDEAL REGULAR PROPERTIES TYPES CAPACITOR , of an IDEAL REGULAR EMF-DC-Source
capable of "letting" through AC-oscillatory Currents....................and a "Mechanical on/off-Switch".........though NOT any socalled Electronics Flyback-diode.....

THÉN WHEN SWITCHED-ON there are some "closely defined" Relations between the obtainable "Amplitudes"-Values for i.e. the Capacitor´s PEAK-Voltage , the Current(t) through Coil and related to the EMF-DC-Source´s Own "Supply-voltage"............a COMMON LC-serially-AC-oscillatory-"pendling" of ESTABLISHED U(t)-I(t)-values......THOUGH WHEN i.e. Switched-OFF at Current-Max through Coil , Thén an "arcing" in the SWitch-air-gap "short-while" forms letting the quickly-nullified-current i Coil be Charging-equivalently the Condenser to a Voltage DEPENDING on the LC-U(t)-I(t)-oscillatory-OFF-Time-Conditions (from the THEN PAST ON-Circuit).........!
If else NOT are any "connections"-reversal of Capacitor´s Wires or else of altered EMF-Source´s Voltage ,etc, THÉN there IS a specified IDEAL RELATIONS LIMIT of Voltages-built-up in the Capacitor !

Might I kindly soon briefly comment about the OTHER promoted discussions Theme : "Blocking-Oscillator to supply Blocking Oscillator......." !

WKR & have Yourselves a nice Day and Fruitfull Researching Results ! My kind Thanks about Your All important interesting Contributions to The Honourable Course of OU  !

Offline powercat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #144 on: February 27, 2009, 08:49:35 PM »
I *will* have a self-running machine that produces usable amounts of power by the end of this year. The mathematics is from well-established conventional physics. It is very clear. It matches my magnetic theory. I took my magnetic theory, made a design in FEMM, ran the sim, and FEMM numbers came back in agreement with my magnetic theory. It will work!


Thank's Paul
a self-running machine that produces usable amounts of power by the end of this year

I Hope it's not another ROLL ON THE END OF   [year]  thread

Sorry but you remind me of a Politician
Your knowledge is far greater than mine and i am learning a lot  thanks

all the best in the future
cat

Offline scotty1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
    • leedskalnin.com
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #145 on: February 28, 2009, 12:04:09 PM »
Can someone just post the proper circuit that was used on the youtube clips.
Every drawing seems to be different all the time?
The guy shorts 3 wires together and uses only one cap that charges.
If somebody makes me a proper drawing that is unanimously agreed on, then i'll spend time on it and do whatever anyone wants...make video's ect....but PLEASE...let's have a drawing of the circuit that is agreed on first?

Some drawings say to use 2 caps...some show one cap, but only 2 wires shorted?
There needs to be one cap and 3 wires shorted!
Scotty.

Offline Koen1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1172
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #146 on: February 28, 2009, 04:53:09 PM »
@Paul: although your work on diode arrays is commendable,
and I do believe you are corrct that such a device would be a great
"free" energy source,
I also am not sure if you can actually stake the claim that it is
your diode array invention...
After all, the concept of using highly sensitive diodes in an array
coupled to capacitors, in order to "capture" ambient noise,
is quite an old idea.
And in a way a variation of the concept of solar cells.
I see you post things now and then in which you seem to be
proclaiming yourself the inventor of such diode arrays,
but that's not really true...

Yes, you are one of the few to really document the ambient
noise collection scheme and present output figures based
on your experiments with your version of such an array,
I do not argue that, and in fact I do find that very impressive
and a great job on your part. :)
So keep it up eh :)

regards,
Koen

Offline PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #147 on: February 28, 2009, 07:08:38 PM »
@Paul: although your work on diode arrays is commendable,
and I do believe you are corrct that such a device would be a great
"free" energy source,
I also am not sure if you can actually stake the claim that it is
your diode array invention...
After all, the concept of using highly sensitive diodes in an array
coupled to capacitors, in order to "capture" ambient noise,
is quite an old idea.
And in a way a variation of the concept of solar cells.
I see you post things now and then in which you seem to be
proclaiming yourself the inventor of such diode arrays,
but that's not really true...

Yes, you are one of the few to really document the ambient
noise collection scheme and present output figures based
on your experiments with your version of such an array,
I do not argue that, and in fact I do find that very impressive
and a great job on your part. :)
So keep it up eh :)

regards,
Koen

Koen,

I never said that. ***Please*** *first* read what I write before commenting on me. Here's my quote -->

February 27, 2009, 12:02:06 AM
Quote
For over one year I've had the first documented and properly tested "free energy" machine that includes the extreme details, including part #'s, to build.

And please see the date on my quote, which is way before your post.  I clearly said my diode array is the first *******properly documented******* "free energy" generator that includes every detail to replicate.!  You cannot name anyone who has provided sufficient proof. Tom Schum did not complete his measurements because he did not prove that the DC voltage he was measuring was due to external radio signals. I spent ages testing my diode array in up to three complete layers of metal shielding in countless rural areas to show that the location made no difference, that the DC voltage was due to the internal diodes. Charles M. Brown has far less completed evidence than Tom Schum.

Furthermore, I've spent what seemed ages on the mathematical end, which resulted in two software tools where the user enters the parameters of the diode, and the software utilizes the best diode modeling equations based on conventional semiconductor physics, which is based on Quantum Physics. I ported my software to javascript on two web pages -->

Custom Diode Designer:
http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/tools/customdiodedesigner/

The Custom Diode Designer is based on Quantum Physics, and is for designing new diodes. The user picks the dopant type (e.g., n-type), then the semiconductor (e.g., Gallium Antimonide), then the contact metal (e.g., Palladium), then the dopant density, then the diode plate dimensions. Go ahead and try the default diode parameters I have in there when the web page comes up. You'll see it predicts the diode array will produce 104.7 watts.

The other software is Diode NATE, which is for preexisting diodes, so you enter junction capacitance, emission coefficient, and total diodes in-series.

Diode NATE:
http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/tools/diodenate/


Then see the conventional semiconductor mathematics based on Quantum Physics that I go over -->

The Dirty Details:
http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/physics/dirtydetails/


And other science pages that cover every concern -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/forum/index.php?board=85.0

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/physics/


And over two years of extensive measurements -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/forum/index.php?board=66.0


And the details how to replicate my diode array -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/forum/index.php?board=72.0


And details how to actually build semiconductor fabrication equipment that will allow someone to build microscopic diode array chips that would produce usable amounts of power, and it would allow one build solar cells -->

http://greenselfreliantenergy.com/forum/index.php?board=70.0


So I'll say it again, my diode array is the first properly documented "free energy" generator that includes every detail to replicate.!


PL

Offline PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #148 on: February 28, 2009, 07:28:12 PM »
Can someone just post the proper circuit that was used on the youtube clips.
Every drawing seems to be different all the time?
The guy shorts 3 wires together and uses only one cap that charges.
If somebody makes me a proper drawing that is unanimously agreed on, then i'll spend time on it and do whatever anyone wants...make video's ect....but PLEASE...let's have a drawing of the circuit that is agreed on first?

Some drawings say to use 2 caps...some show one cap, but only 2 wires shorted?
There needs to be one cap and 3 wires shorted!
Scotty.

You can ask the guy who created the video to be certain, but as far as I can tell it's just a charged large capacitance capacitor that is connected to a custom built bifilar ferrite core coil for a very short period of time by tapped a clip lead to a metal plate. The secondary coil on the bifilar is connected to a capacitor of small capacitance, and I presume there's a diode in the secondary circuit for obvious reasons.

Please know that you just can't build a bifilar coil and expect to get his results. Either his large blue cap is significantly less than 7500uF (perhaps partially damaged), or dielectric absorption (relaxation) is the cause for error in voltage readings, or just got astronomically lucky in the way he wound his bifilar coil.

PL

Offline NRGFromTheVacuum

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
Re: Real OU-Effect to Share with everyone!!!
« Reply #149 on: March 01, 2009, 03:29:10 AM »
You can ask the guy who created the video to be certain, but as far as I can tell it's just a charged large capacitance capacitor that is connected to a custom built bifilar ferrite core coil for a very short period of time by tapped a clip lead to a metal plate. The secondary coil on the bifilar is connected to a capacitor of small capacitance, and I presume there's a diode in the secondary circuit for obvious reasons.

There are no diodes, or semiconductors involved in my circuit for the obvious reason, they require energy to operate.

Quote
Please know that you just can't build a bifilar coil and expect to get his results. Either his large blue cap is significantly less than 7500uF (perhaps partially damaged), or dielectric absorption (relaxation) is the cause for error in voltage readings, or just got astronomically lucky in the way he wound his bifilar coil.

PL

The Coil: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TbdP8ntnb4