Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: HydroMeyers Vic  (Read 237201 times)

johnbostick

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #150 on: February 09, 2009, 04:01:31 PM »


Notice the patent number 5297857? That is the last patent Stan filed on the water car and there were no tube cells at that point.

johnbostick claimed that Meyer didn't use a laser. You can't fix that.

And you wonder why you don't figure it out or why people don't contribute? You can't fix that.

Buzz claims that Meyer didn't use a tube cell. You can't fix that.

And you wonder why you don't figure it out or why people don't contribute? You can't fix that.

johnbostick

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #151 on: February 09, 2009, 04:35:57 PM »
Notice in the last patent Stan filed the Vic is conected to the tube cell and nothing else.  Buzz would try to claim that Stan at this point hasn't evolved this to his Variable Intergalactic Colliding laser beam yet.  Get a grip Buzz. Are you just trying to scare people away or are you truly that confused?

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #152 on: February 09, 2009, 04:47:44 PM »
John

That is Not patent # 5293857

The one where  St Buzz says  no more cell the final evolution

         Chet



johnbostick

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #153 on: February 09, 2009, 05:02:32 PM »
Chet,

This is stans last patent that the St. is talking about. follow this link to freepatentsonline and create an account and you can download it.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5293857.html?query=PN/5293857%2520OR%25205293857&stemming=on

johnbostick

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #154 on: February 09, 2009, 05:26:27 PM »
I think Buzz may be some Govt. agency trying to impede progress in this field.  It seems too intelligent to be so totally confused with this research.

johnbostick

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #155 on: February 09, 2009, 05:46:29 PM »
Buzz,
Have your people PM me.  For the right price I too can be bought.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #156 on: February 09, 2009, 06:12:29 PM »
John

I believe everyone has the right to their interpretation

Some just read and come to conclusions

Others read experiment and come to conclusions

I believe you guys are discussing old and new patents

Comparing the campfire to the Rocket engine

Everybody can play with a camp fire

The other??

St Buzz is Good people

Men will come to their own conclusions with the results they get or don't get

Its time that will tell, no one is stopping their research

Chet

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #157 on: February 09, 2009, 06:48:50 PM »
can't comment on a deleted post

dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #158 on: February 09, 2009, 10:16:49 PM »
Ramset

 ... Make us this make us that cry cry cry ... Plz make me a 5lpm cell with low power consumption wtf ???







« Last Edit: February 10, 2009, 12:28:07 AM by dankie »

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #159 on: February 09, 2009, 11:51:49 PM »
Dankie

Here since 2002 in Korea for sale

 put it in your living room [unvented]

Or their bigger units up to 500000.BTU

no waste of time  no time to waste

 http://www.browngas.com/eng_bestkorea/history_1.htm

        
« Last Edit: February 10, 2009, 12:25:04 AM by ramset »

johnbostick

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #160 on: February 10, 2009, 12:50:08 AM »

March 1994 US 5293857
In this patent Stan brings it all together with the management system, the air gas processor is fully disclosed, the laser, the injectors, everything. At this point in the evolution there are apparently no tube cells in the system.

Now look at the front cover of the box:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6702.msg155635#msg155635

Notice the patent number 5297857? That is the last patent Stan filed on the water car and there were no tube cells at that point.

That coil is the HV coil (VIC) that powers the electrodes in the ozone generator in the air gas processor. That coil is bank wound and that is how we wind a high voltage coil to prevent the layers from shorting. The rule is something like ten winds per layer and each layer has to be insulated.

This is the last patent Meyer filed on the water car and it was fully evolved for commercial production at that point. There were no tube cells in the process at that point and the front cover of that box proves what it is.

And you wonder why you don't figure it out or why people don't contribute? You can't fix that.

Buzz,

Please try to be as honest as you can. Try to refain from insulting these people. You know your not all that or you would have some proof in your research.  If you do prove it.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2009, 03:47:58 AM by johnbostick »

kinesisfilms

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #161 on: February 10, 2009, 01:22:57 AM »
johnbostick you are correct about the waterfuel cell in that patent.....

there are two version at first....you show this version (note how there is a fuel cell separate from the injectors.)
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y2/kinesisfilms/entiresystem.jpg

then it moved to this version...(don't mind the red circles that was used for something else a while ago)...note how there is no longer a fuel cell.
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y2/kinesisfilms/donkey.jpg

so johnbostick you are correct for that version.

let buzz keep talking he will just consistently prove himself incorrect.

once again there were many version to this method.....so don't look at every piece and think it is the final...you have to understand the conceptual parts first.

i can't stand to keep reading his bullshit.

johnbostick

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #162 on: February 10, 2009, 01:46:24 AM »
Thanks Kinesisfim

I am new at this and do need a little direction.  My plan is to share all I find.  I want to be apart of this research.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2009, 03:38:17 AM by johnbostick »

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #163 on: February 10, 2009, 03:01:40 AM »
A LOT OF THICK SKINNED FELLOWS OVER HERE

Thats good , very good

Thats what its gonna take to see this through

The really cool thing is

Its out there, this is going to happen!!

And this is just the tip of the Iceberg

Chet




kinesisfilms

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: HydroMeyers Vic
« Reply #164 on: February 10, 2009, 04:48:39 AM »
Think it though!

through*

and of course there were many versions but you were wrong, dependtard.

please continue to over-complicate yourself....keep it simple STUPID....meyers directed that towards people like you.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2009, 05:10:55 AM by kinesisfilms »