Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: My blueprint and white papers on my magnetism run generator  (Read 23661 times)

Offline chalamadad

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 148
Re: My blueprint and white papers on my magnetism run generator
« Reply #15 on: November 26, 2011, 02:42:15 PM »
[...]
In the last 30 years, with major advancements in astronomical tools, the collective sum of evidence against big bang theory is greater than the one and only piece of evidence which has been used to prop it up. That prop is the observation of galaxial redshift, which has other explanations than just that of an expanding universe from a central big bang.
[...]

As we know the doppler effect for sound is dependent on the velocity of the medium, carrying the waves. So what if space itself was a dynamic medium? Wouldn't that destroy assumptions about distances indicated by redshifts?
From what I've read the Michelson experiments conclusions are wrong as it does not eliminate the ether drift possibility at all. In fact the experiment might just have proven the existance of ether drift.

Offline hoptoad

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1009
Re: My blueprint and white papers on my magnetism run generator
« Reply #16 on: November 27, 2011, 01:55:03 AM »
As we know the doppler effect for sound is dependent on the velocity of the medium, carrying the waves. So what if space itself was a dynamic medium? Wouldn't that destroy assumptions about distances indicated by redshifts?
It would indeed.
cheers

Offline CompuTutor

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
Re: My blueprint and white papers on my magnetism run generator
« Reply #17 on: November 27, 2011, 05:14:32 AM »
Additional ideas...

You can epoxy one round barrel magnet flush with the end of a short metal tube.

Take the platen off the end of the screw of a C-Clamp, leaving the ball end only.

Then put enough epoxy into the tube to hold a second magnet,
and insert it  so the poles your pushing together are the same (Repelling NN or SS).

Screw the clamp down until the magnets touch, an wait for the epoxy to dry FULLY (LOL).

I'd wait two full days, not just the 24-hours the package will state...

Then cut off the unused remainder of the metal tube.



You can use a ferrous (IE: steel) tube to provide a closed flux path
from the center of both magnets out to the ends of each magnet.

Picture the H-frame of a transformer, with the magnets the center pole,
but instead of having two outside poles to provide a return flux path,
you have a completely encasing tubular return flux path instead.



The above is an old old idea,
but there is a variant that allows the return path to be turned on and off.

Just use a nonferrous tube (IE: copper) instead of steel,
next wind two coils starting at the tube/magnets center,
(or a single center-tapped wire) and wind to both ends.

Starting from the center, wind both coils in the same direction onto the tube,
so the appearance is one is wound clockwise, the other counter-clockwise.

When you induce a flux into the copper from the coils,
the copper will also include the flux from the magnets,
and the effect will cease when the coil's power does.

I'm at the risk of pointing out the obvious here perhaps,
but the center tap (or the two wire ends at the middle)
get one polarity in, and the two ends get the other polarity.

You could also do this without the coils be flowing current through the tubing,
one polaritiy applied to the center of the tube right where the magnets meet,
the other polarity applied to both ends of the copper tubing piece equally.

But this would require an insane amount of current,
so as such, this is a completely inviable method.

Something similar to this is how magnetic locking doors work
as an application example for you to judge concept eligibility.



Either way, you wind up with the same pole at each ends,
for whatever reason you think this will help your concept.

You might want to read up on "Parallel-Path Magnetics" too...

http://www.google.com/search?q=Magnet+%22Parallel+Path%22&hl=en&newwindow=1&gbv=2&num=100&lr=lang_en&ft=i&cr=&safe=off