Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: 3 dimensional gyroscope shows antigravity  (Read 39986 times)

Real Boots

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Henrey William Wallace spin nuclei patents replication
« Reply #15 on: August 23, 2014, 05:15:28 PM »
I cannot find any discussion anywheres on the Wallace patents, trying to find out if anyone has ever attempted replication of any of the devices in these 3 patents.  If you read them over closely it certainly appears as if Wallace built at least 2 of the devices, the initial experimental setup has test data in the patent, and the heat pump patent is in tremendous detail which leads me to believe it was also built.  Not sure about the gravitational shielding embodiment however as he doesn't go into great detail there.  Why would he indicate that the gravity shield shell should be made of bismuth when there are other materials with much higher densities of unpaired nucleons per volume such as aluminum?  Could it be that aluminum has longer relaxation time of the nuclear spin axis alignment and would therefore not be suitable as conductor of the gravitomagnetic field at such high frequencies? 
Even replication of the specific heat change in a copper sample exposed to the field would give great validity to these patents and should not be overly difficult or pricey. 
I am very surprised that there is not more on the net about these patents! 
You can find the patents here:
http://www.rexresearch.com/wallace/wallace.htm
-boots

Real Boots

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Henry William Wallace patents
« Reply #16 on: October 11, 2014, 04:45:48 AM »
Apparently no one understands or gives a **** about conquering gravity anymore, guess I will have to attempt replication myself.  This makes way too much sense not to attempt. 
Apparent lack of mad scientists in the world these days....
-boots

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: 3 dimensional gyroscope shows antigravity
« Reply #17 on: October 11, 2014, 09:21:34 AM »
RB
Do you know anything about the inventor  ...company.. is he still on the planet?
wheres he from?


thanks for the links
http://www.rexresearch.com/wallace/wallace.htm[/font]



Chet
ps
for the TinMan


repost from this thread by Neptune


On the subject of antigravity and gyroscopes, does anyone remember Sam Kydd? He was an Australian inventor who developed a giro antigravity device. I read about him in a book from my local library. I think it was probably back in the 1980s. The device was driven by  a model aircraft engine, and when placed on the scales, showed a weight reduction of about 10%. When mounted in a horizontal position on a model boat, it would propel the boat. He was looking for funding for further development. I can find no reference to him on the internet.


tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: 3 dimensional gyroscope shows antigravity
« Reply #18 on: October 11, 2014, 01:24:04 PM »



Chet
ps
for the TinMan


repost from this thread by Neptune


On the subject of antigravity and gyroscopes, does anyone remember Sam Kydd? He was an Australian inventor who developed a giro antigravity device. I read about him in a book from my local library. I think it was probably back in the 1980s. The device was driven by  a model aircraft engine, and when placed on the scales, showed a weight reduction of about 10%. When mounted in a horizontal position on a model boat, it would propel the boat. He was looking for funding for further development. I can find no reference to him on the internet.
Do you mean Sandy kidd ?,who was scottish,and a member of the RAF. He was said to have designed a Gyroscopic Inertial Thruster (GIT),but after many built and tested devices,it never showed the results he had hoped for.

Sam Kydd(the Aussie) is an actor that stared in a film, where a college professor invents an anti-gravity substance.

It is strange how things get all muddled up on the grape vine lol.

Real Boots

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: 3 dimensional gyroscope shows antigravity
« Reply #19 on: October 15, 2014, 08:26:19 PM »
Ramset;
That same site I linked has stuff written about the inventor that states that he was working for Lockheed Martin skunk works and GE re-entry systems in the 60's 70's era, last sign I can find of him is that brief article from ~1983 regarding the inventions where he gives some futher explainations about density of nucleons being in the range where it would be necessary to see such GM fields generated. 
Absolutly nothing after that point, find it weird he would bother patenting the heat pump patent several years after the initial patents if this this did not work, also strange he never seems to have used the patents as it looks like he dropped of the face of the earth, no further writings or mention of him. 
-Boots

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Henrey William Wallace spin nuclei patents replication
« Reply #20 on: October 15, 2014, 09:12:11 PM »
I cannot find any discussion anywheres on the Wallace patents, trying to find out if anyone has ever attempted replication of any of the devices in these 3 patents.  If you read them over closely it certainly appears as if Wallace built at least 2 of the devices, the initial experimental setup has test data in the patent, and the heat pump patent is in tremendous detail which leads me to believe it was also built.  Not sure about the gravitational shielding embodiment however as he doesn't go into great detail there.  Why would he indicate that the gravity shield shell should be made of bismuth when there are other materials with much higher densities of unpaired nucleons per volume such as aluminum?  Could it be that aluminum has longer relaxation time of the nuclear spin axis alignment and would therefore not be suitable as conductor of the gravitomagnetic field at such high frequencies? 
Even replication of the specific heat change in a copper sample exposed to the field would give great validity to these patents and should not be overly difficult or pricey. 
I am very surprised that there is not more on the net about these patents! 
You can find the patents here:
http://www.rexresearch.com/wallace/wallace.htm
-boots
Yes, the Wallace antigravity claims have been investigated in some considerable detail by some very well-funded and competent people. All I can say about it is that it didn't pan out.
My own feeling is that Bismuth is specified because it is the most diamagnetic of the metals. As we now know, bismuth is easy to levitate in a magnetic field because of its strongly diamagnetic nature. I think Wallace fooled himself by magnetically levitating or reducing the weight of bismuth structures or parts in his experiments, and believed he was seeing a gravitational effect instead of a magnetic one. Of course many people seem to believe that magnetism can affect gravity actually, rather than apparently.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: 3 dimensional gyroscope shows antigravity
« Reply #21 on: October 15, 2014, 09:16:12 PM »
Do you mean Sandy kidd ?,who was scottish,and a member of the RAF. He was said to have designed a Gyroscopic Inertial Thruster (GIT),but after many built and tested devices,it never showed the results he had hoped for.

Sam Kydd(the Aussie) is an actor that stared in a film, where a college professor invents an anti-gravity substance.

It is strange how things get all muddled up on the grape vine lol.

Yep, and there are a few video clips on YT concerning Sandy. Pretty clever gyro devices he had, too, sort of combinations of gyros and Dean Drive kind of things. His machines were a class of Forced Precession Gyro systems which are indeed interesting. I have one such here on my bench at the moment that is the closest thing to antigravity I've ever seen. But it isn't, really.

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: 3 dimensional gyroscope shows antigravity
« Reply #22 on: October 16, 2014, 11:48:26 AM »
Yep, and there are a few video clips on YT concerning Sandy. Pretty clever gyro devices he had, too, sort of combinations of gyros and Dean Drive kind of things. His machines were a class of Forced Precession Gyro systems which are indeed interesting. I have one such here on my bench at the moment that is the closest thing to antigravity I've ever seen. But it isn't, really.
Well we could always use acoustic levitation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rz6UzqegA6Q

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: 3 dimensional gyroscope shows antigravity
« Reply #23 on: October 16, 2014, 04:09:30 PM »
Tinsel
Quote
the closest_ thing_ to antigravity I've ever seen.
--------------------------
SSoooo
when yah gonna show us your antigravity Thingy ??



thx
Chet
« Last Edit: October 16, 2014, 09:31:22 PM by ramset »

russwr

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
Re: 3 dimensional gyroscope shows antigravity
« Reply #24 on: September 30, 2023, 03:02:12 AM »
The lifting / gravity control of mass was already done in the late 1800's , by John W. Keely machinist , inventor and musician in Philadelphia. Lots of documents available. See S V P. Books , and copies of documents. One of 4 different Keely gravity demonstrations was 3 spinning brass flywheels on heavy metal platform as SIRENS . The cup shaped ridges on rims was speed up by forced compressed AIR. When the tones generated was appropriate, Keely slowed down two so as there was an Inharmonic blend of tones in the air on top edges on angle, with certain ratio. The whole unit slowly rose up. The compressor was stopped. The base plate slowly settled down with decreasing RPMS. Why are people not studying the works of Keely? (3 gyroscopes / flywheels are needed not 1 or 2)