Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?  (Read 90861 times)

Bennyboy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #15 on: January 06, 2009, 06:27:36 AM »
@TheBuzz

Very interesting theory, thanks for taking the time to post it.

Regards,
Ben.

Dave45

  • Guest
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #16 on: January 06, 2009, 01:55:08 PM »
with the cavitation collector if the water was given a positive charge and the hydrofoils were negative or viseversa would it help control implosion that happens at the trailing edge of the hydrofoils, also most hydrofoils are designed to reduce cavitation but that would be an easy fix.

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #17 on: January 06, 2009, 03:11:58 PM »
Buzz,

Attached is a blurb on sonoluminsescence (red-yellow) and electroluminescence (blue) and the colors of light they produce during caviation.

Electrical discharges have also been witnessed in cavitating water.

You get the same with a quenched spark gap.  Very noticable in a amgnetically quenched gap.

Is cavitation a very sudden, repeated, compressive force, often preceeded by a slow rarefaction?

EDIT: added attachements
(second attachement is a description of acoustic caviation, which is very relavant)
« Last Edit: January 06, 2009, 03:55:28 PM by Grumpy »

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #18 on: January 06, 2009, 04:29:32 PM »
    I can't imagine filling my 2000 watt ultrasonic parts cleaner with Mercury.  Maybe a spaceship or two. ;D

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #19 on: January 06, 2009, 05:43:47 PM »
Without a mass to atomic energy conversion, it is impossible to go OU since thermodynamics will  apply without mass to atomic energy conversion. Thane already made the OU claim with his toroid. So where did the energy come from that filled up that added capacity? You can't answer that question until you understand my theory.

There is a reason that a small group of professional spooks are working overtime to suppress this cavitation information here and on another web site. Getting me banned, locking a thread, deleting a thread, their motives are as obvious as their pedantic methods. Understanding cavitation is key to understanding how all free energy devices work - no exceptions.

I think I can now answer that question:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=4047.msg148396#msg148396
Does the following image correctly explain the cavitation effect as it applies to TH's device?

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #20 on: January 06, 2009, 05:49:53 PM »
Sparks
Don"t even think about it!! [well maybe just a little bit ,couldn't hurt]

Ultrasonic cavitation of mercury??[YIKES] STAY AWAY FROM THE LIGHT!!

Grumpy
sweet read
I especially like the acoustic info [still fixated on how Thrapp and his buddies figured out that water heater sphere]
NATURE RUNS WITH GAIN!!

Buzz
You are a great teacher
 I would love to go fishing with you some day [I'm a terrible fisherman ,although I have been paying attention to your lessons]

 Chet

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #21 on: January 06, 2009, 08:18:46 PM »
Hello TheBuzz,

do you know this "matter is made of waves" simulation ?
Someone posted this here, I do not remember when and where.

http://glafreniere.com/matter.htm

Regards

Kator01

Kator01

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 898
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #22 on: January 06, 2009, 08:55:36 PM »
Hi all,

please go to the download-section here :

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=0

and read the Dixon-Papier on page 15 of the files-section( Texas-Instruments enginneer) in order to understand how eddy-currents behave in HV-Coils and how these currents then develop into "normal current"-distribution in the cross-section of the filaments.

Best Regards

Kator01

PS ; Nice shark-skin-picture here ;

http://bionik.fbsm.hs-bremen.de/downloads/fotos_antifouling/haischuppen_300dpi.jpg




PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #23 on: January 08, 2009, 05:30:03 PM »
TheBuzz (prometheus), why don't you test your cavitation theory by showing the gamma radiation? J.L. Naudin claims the output of his MEG replication was greater than the output by well over 3 times, yet when he tested his MEG for gamma radiation it showed absolutely no gamma radiation.

I don't think any "free energy" machine is produced by cavitation, and they definitely don't produce gamma radiation. This is an easy theory to test, has been tested by J.L.Naudin. You attack people on a personal level who even suggest testing your theory.

PL

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #24 on: January 08, 2009, 05:52:15 PM »
TheBuzz (prometheus), why don't you test your cavitation theory by showing the gamma radiation? J.L. Naudin claims the output of his MEG replication was greater than the output by well over 3 times, yet when he tested his MEG for gamma radiation it showed absolutely no gamma radiation.

I don't think any "free energy" machine is produced by cavitation, and they definitely don't produce gamma radiation. This is an easy theory to test, has been tested by J.L.Naudin. You attack people on a personal level who even suggest testing your theory.

PL

Didn't Buzz test his theory with his latest build of Thane's E-coil?  Yep, that was a test and he explained the results with "cavitation".   Someone asked about adding a cap across the HV coil and Thane said he may have tried that and it may have decellerated the disc.  Why would it decellerate?

PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #25 on: January 08, 2009, 05:54:15 PM »
Didn't Buzz test his theory with his latest build of Thane's E-coil?  Yep, that was a test and he explained the results with "cavitation".   Someone asked about adding a cap across the HV coil and Thane said he may have tried that and it may have decellerated the disc.  Why would it decellerate?
No, TheBuzz did not test his theory. Any nuclear fusion reactions will produce gamma radiation.

As far as explaining results based on an untested theory, anyone can come up numerous ways to explain something, but that is almost pointless until you test your theory.

PL

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #26 on: January 08, 2009, 06:05:20 PM »
No, TheBuzz did not test his theory. Any nuclear fusion reactions will produce gamma radiation.

PL

Can you point us all to a detector that can discriminate between true gamma radiation and any other induced charge effect?

Also, transmutation is not fusion.

PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #27 on: January 08, 2009, 06:13:25 PM »
Nuclear transmutation is the conversion of one chemical element or isotope into another, which occurs through nuclear reactions. It can be fusion or fission. Nuclear transmutation produces gamma radiation.

I've provided the links to a $15 Geiger counter in the previous cavitation thread that the Admin of this forum closed, and rightfully so. A Geiger counter uses a Geiger-Müller tube -->
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geiger-Müller_tube

PL

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #28 on: January 08, 2009, 06:23:22 PM »
Nuclear transmutation is the conversion of one chemical element or isotope into another, which occurs through nuclear reactions. It can be fusion or fission. Nuclear transmutation produces gamma radiation.

I've provided the links to a $15 Geiger counter in the previous cavitation thread that the Admin of this forum closed, and rightfully so. A Geiger counter uses a Geiger-Müller tube -->
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geiger-Müller_tube

PL

As long as you keep ignoring the fact that a Geiger tube is "indiscriminant" - I have nothing more to say about it and you can stop bringing it up.

If you had followed up on the work of Walter Russell, you would know that the transmutation I refer to in not the brute force nuclear reaction of conventional science.

Then there is this reference:

Quote
The employees of RNC "Kurchatov Institute" Urutskoev, Liksonov and Tsynoev [23] organized experiments on the study of electrical discharge explosions of titanium wire in sealed polyethylene balloons, filled by water.

As a result this experiment, new chemical elements were revealed, which had not been present at the installation.

Amongst these elements produced were Na, Ca, Fe, Ni, Au, Pb.

Electrical discharge explosion of a wire is a form of "cavitation".  ;D

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Cavitation: Is it the key to alternative energy?
« Reply #29 on: January 08, 2009, 06:30:11 PM »
Paul
When the administrator locks a thread ,he always leaves a post with the reason[not so in this case]
As you know anyone that starts a thread can lock it
Chet