Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Natures Perpetual Wheel  (Read 28928 times)

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #30 on: December 16, 2005, 08:43:51 PM »
as for the balls well , use cup holders ;-P.

(something to keep them in Place , lock them in for instance).

so they don't fall out, well it would affect the performance a bit but i prefer that ;-P

or use glue

or tape.

i think the ball would have to be the same weight or even lighter (prolly have to experiment around with that).

the device needs fiddleing around with , (but the weight must be the same).

sigh..

Replicateing is fun eh?

:-).

you now see it hopefully,  (this is a nother way of extracting em energy ,)

« Last Edit: December 16, 2005, 08:58:45 PM by lltfdaniel1 »

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #31 on: December 16, 2005, 08:54:15 PM »
well every bit of it would need to be equal(in weight or simular in weight) because the Fastest part is the more Heavy!

which is why i think he used balls in stead of something else,

and all of that heavey force goes to the least weight ( ball)

and that CAUSES Unbalance .

and that negitive energy goes back into the fastest spining Part!


lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #32 on: December 16, 2005, 09:01:23 PM »
ITS ACTUALLY EASY To make one of these, id start with plastic. (because its cheap and would be strong enough... hopefully)
to gain knowledge of this machine.

and measure ments . etc etc..

........




We are deprived of machinery!

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #33 on: December 16, 2005, 09:23:44 PM »
i think the best way to get better performance is,

the inner (cone) will be heavyist then the bar and then the holder and then the balls.

which will create some serious counter- gravity effect to produce spin,

or you could do it all equal ...

id go for the one where the weight decreases.

because all that negtive power goes back into the heavy spinner (back to the cone , useing the bars).

Simple!

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #34 on: December 16, 2005, 09:27:49 PM »
when i decide to make one of these i will post results and building tips. (and im actually Likely BUT not very likely, to build one.) i aint got the tools you see..and not to much patence..

so let this clear the confuseion , and its not running on air ;-).

this well have some design tips but i just been explaining how it works to the uniformed.

sorry about the many posts, i kinda got carryed away ......

i wonder if it could be converted into a water gravity powered wheel ;-).

or stick a telsa turbine in the middle of that Tube , Bahaha!!

YOU Could actually wind coils around it with magnets , so you wouldnt need to plug the kinetic force into a generator for instance.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2005, 09:52:20 PM by lltfdaniel1 »

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #35 on: December 16, 2005, 11:25:04 PM »

    They call me deranged. The hope is that they are right! It is of no greater or lesser import for yet another fool to wander this Earth. But if I am right and science is wrong, then may the Lord God have mercy on mankind! ... How else should it be done then?, was always the immediate question. The answer is simple: Exactly in the opposite way that it is done today!

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #36 on: December 16, 2005, 11:38:13 PM »
this 2 : 1 gravity effect can be used in many Designs you know.

ooandioo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #37 on: December 17, 2005, 01:18:44 AM »
This wont work. If you would like to get 1kg steel ball at the same high were it starts from, you need for right timing (means the ball has to be up again before or just when the next ball on the left touches bottom) at least a 1:7.1 gear, wich also means 1:7.1 power = 7.1 kg on the left. I you only have 7kg on the left, nothing will happen. A gear not only speeds up the transport, it also takes more energy (exactly the same amount more energy) to do this...

Sorry.

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #38 on: December 17, 2005, 04:14:19 AM »
yea the norwegian design .. it can't run on its own.

anyways there is lots of designs you can put this into , which doesnt need the ball to roll.

but the norwegian design will Defanitly run on a 2kw ELECTRIC MOTOR, to restart the Process and thus produce more power then that put in, 2kw for erm over 10kw !

the helix design is sucessful it sorts out this stupid rolling ball thing. , its instant.

you can always speed up or slow down the motor ;-).

wheres you faith in this vortex gravity technology?

and if ye doubt the helix gravity then please doubt the minato wheel ;-).

and the other Pmm.

telsa coils,

do i need to say more?

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #39 on: December 17, 2005, 04:21:37 AM »
anyways im thinking of building one of these http://www.fuellesspower.com/Paypal/earth2.html , to power one of these > http://www.ogormans.co.uk/electric_heaters.htm .

i aint a mechanic.

115 volts, i think that could actually produce over 1kw eh?

dunno about the amps though.

or at least 300-500w.

unless there are multiple.

Tink

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #40 on: December 17, 2005, 05:26:25 AM »
Daniel are you okay?
Who are you working for?
NSA?

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #41 on: December 17, 2005, 09:44:24 AM »
i work for nobody,

anyways it should not take long to figure out how to break ather waves.

im going use Nails (in a row of 10 x 10 ) with paper clips (on the tops hooked) and see what happens,

hey , you can see the 'invisible energy' when you close your eyes, its colour is blue and it has nothing to do with your human eye sight.

ooandioo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #42 on: December 17, 2005, 11:28:47 AM »
You are right, i see it - but wait, isn't it sunlight going through my pulsing venes?

mh

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #43 on: December 18, 2005, 12:39:32 AM »
its em energy , can you see that?

i think ive got an idea of a way to replicate the telsa vaccum electron Tube.

since no where on the internet , (did a quick search) does it ever Clearly explain how to get one of these running.

But SINCE YOU CAN PUT A WIRE 2000-4000 FEET IN THE AIR AND YOU GET Enough power - volts because it gets closer to the magnetic power of the earth,

and since the volts down here NEED Boosting, like a radio Booster,


-----------------

http://www.keelynet.com/interact/arc_1_99-4_99/00000272.htm



Tesla found that the energy peaks at 12 Hz, 500 Khz and their =
harmonics. That is why I mentioned 12 Hz. I had once thought that Tesla =
used the vacuum tubes because he was using aether, but after looking at =
some of his other writtings and experiments with this electricity, it =
seems as though he built the box to increase the current of the =
electricity. I'm sure that this is possible and had I a better =
understanding of vacuum tube technology I would try to explain this in =
more detail. The reason I believe that his box was in fact built to =
amplify the current of the electricity is because Tesla had already =
conducted similar experiments as Jerry Gallimore had and had the same =
trouble that Jerry Gallimore had with a weak current. It is therefore =
only logical to conclude that Tesla used this same atmospheric =
electricity. This is not only indicated and supported by Tesla's notes =
and diagrams, but his methods resemble the later experiments of others =
like Jerry Gallimore to such a degree that it is silly to conclude that =
they were not using the same kind of electricity and obtaining it from =
the same source. All Tesla needed after tunning in the peak voltage =
frequency was to increase, or amplify the current by some means. That is =
why I believe that Tesla built the converter box not to convert or draw =
power from the aether, but to amplify the current of the electricity =
that he was recieving from the atmosphere. =20

--------------------

hey why not try your cloth hanger that would be a pretty good ariel to test to see if you get any Volts which would be likely Anyways.

So with this all you need is a rod and a tube to accelerate and ampify the electric signal thus geting More volts(like a radio, even see patents where they get electric from a radio??????????), which is easy to see aint it?

with a bit of fiddleing about we could get a telsa electron amplifyer, because you do get volts in the air , and this Amplifys THOSE VOLTS.

as we know ( and 4 billion of the population dont.)

it just needs to figure out the circuit , but AC ELECTRIC Is flexible .

why not stick a rod in a vaccum tube and place 2 wires(to the ROD or 1 to the tube and 1 to the rod, or completely to the vaccum tube) and then connect it to a Bulb.

;-).

IF THE BULB DONT MELT .


« Last Edit: December 18, 2005, 12:56:43 AM by lltfdaniel1 »

lltfdaniel1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
Re: Natures Perpetual Wheel
« Reply #44 on: December 18, 2005, 12:55:08 AM »
i think the only reason why he used resistor is because the circuit would of Fryed, with all those Ether volts..

or why would of he used it?