Hi Froarty,
The Casimir force is an undeniable fact, indicating a presence of field inevitably calling forth the Eather concept back into the light of science,
and the connection mentioned in your topic regarding this Zero Point energy involvement in Casimir effects caused by Planck scale cavitational
phenomenom in water cells sounds both intriguing and plausible to me.
And I really enjoyed your colorful and visual description of vacuum fluctuations as virtual particles squeezing through a nuclei wide mesh of all matter,
stretching infinitely to trace out our macroscopic 3D illusion of reality as experienced by the limited human senses.
However, we have to be aware of the fact that the Casimir effect is a real and empirically defined force, which certainly not is the fact with the theory
of Quantuum mechanics which are just mathematical derivations created by our great thinkers long before the Zero Point energy was discovered.
The discovery of the Casimir effect and Zero Point energy has forced the Quantuum theory to adapt this effect into the dynamics of the Quantuum mechanics.
This was done by incorporating the theory of virtual particles, which is still just a theory.
Zero Point energy and The Casimir Effect are not theory, they are fully detecable phenomena.
Quantuum Theory is nothing more than a far out guess full of contradictions and paradoxes.
What I am trying to say is there are other possible explanations to the Casimir Effect than the theory of virtual particles.
One is that there is no attractice or pushing forces applied to the Casimir plates at all. Instead the resulting effect between the plates
is caused by a differential in the very underlying field being responsible for the existense of our universe.
The critical distance between the Casimir plates is here resulting in a field differential in space and time, causing space to decrease between
the plates relative to space outside the plates, due to the inhibited frequency range of the underlying field in the Planck scale range.
Imagine Zero Point energy being not only equal to the so called Dark Matter, but indeed being equal to the very Underlying Field
responsible for the sustenance and projection of space, time and matter into our Universe.
Then the Casimir effect becomes just a detectable response to this field, just as any other detectable physical force from this viewpoint merely
is a response to the condition of field.
By understanding universe as being projected and sustained by one and only one basic underlying accellerating field, from which all other detectable
forces emanate, such as gravity, electromagnetism and so forth, we are treading into a deeper level of understanding than what is served us by the
paradoxes and contradictions in the wake of the Quantuum theory.
Personally I am a little surprised that so many people "buy" the Quantuum theory so easily, just because our greatest thinkers are backing it up.
Maybe they are all wrong, just like we were 500 years ago when we studied the strange movements of the celestal bodies from a fixed viewpoint of a flat non moving Earth.
Personally I believe we are in the same situation again, even if this time we are dealing with more complex matters.
Could it be that mankind’s experimental results and observations are accurate, but wrongly interpreted when explained?
What if our nicely defined forces like gravity and electromagnetism are not even forces at all?
What if even light itself is not a wave or particle that travels from A to B?
Our present concept of universe being here by its own means as physical matter in vacant emptiness may be a major misconception.
The life long efforts invested by our brightest physicists are all based on a few untouchable fundamental concepts,
being the very base for their complex models.
But if the foundation of the base is at fault, the rest of the structure will falter.
So maybe contemporary science has got it all wrong from the very start.
According to the paradigm shifting relativity theory of David Barclay, this is the unfortunate situation.
Froarty, I really enjoyed reading your post, and realizing your clarity of thought, I just wanted to say that here you have a really
nice idea about water cells and The casimir Effect, so why incorporating it into a theory like the contradictory Quantuum theory that seems
to have nothing fruitful to contribute.
We have to get out of the box, there are alternative and far more unified ideas about our universe presented today.
Give yourself the opportunity to check David Barclays relativity theory "Unity". It is downloadable for free as PDF-files at
http://www.gravitycontrol.org/unity-book.html or as a hardcopy at Amazon.com
http://www.amazon.com/Unity-W-David-Barclay/dp/B002ADBZRM/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1271284651&sr=1-7Since his theory is so totally off all conventional outlooks on the world of physics, there is an initial hardship in assimilating his groundbraking
view of our universe.
Therefore I have made an attempt to describe his theory in a hopefully more easily understood context, in my paper called "The Casing Theory", which
is a theory regarding the connection between the multilayered Roswell casing fragments and the Casimir Effect seen in the light of David Barclays
Unity-theory.
http://www.gravitycontrol.org/forum/index.php?topic=328.0In my foreword and introduction to The Casing Theory I am making a serious attempt to reach out to the reader about what David Barclay
has come to understand about our reality.
A small but intriguing effect of Davids Theory is that it easily explains why the Voyager vessels and the Explorer vessels are deccelerating,
a mysterious fact creating big questions at NASA.
In the light of David Barclays worldview, the Casimir Effect seems less affected by contradictions than in conventional physics theories.
I am writing all this, since you seem to be on an unfortunately rarely treaded path parallel to mine and Davids, and would like to have your opinion.
Gwandau