Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Feedback To Source  (Read 389021 times)

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #555 on: May 28, 2009, 09:47:13 PM »
@all

Remember that it will charge the battery some points below its natural voltage, because it is used at the same time.
Example if the battery without the joule thief load was 1.03V it will be working some points below that initial voltage and charged at the same time.
When you take it off it will be back to its original voltage or better.

After you verify this, then we will need the assistance of the @pirate topic crew to use the system to light something with the same amount of energy used by the circuit without an added load.

Jesus

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #556 on: May 28, 2009, 11:38:52 PM »
just an update.
i'm still @ 1.24V

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #557 on: May 29, 2009, 12:42:58 AM »
just an update.
i'm still @ 1.24V

Check if taking out the charging diodes an LED works on the circuit and after put everithing back as it was.

If the circuit is working properly, yours is performing better than mine.
You can leave it the whole night working and in the morning the battery will be the same voltage as the last measurement you did today.

Jesus

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #558 on: May 29, 2009, 03:47:17 AM »
Check if taking out the charging diodes an LED works on the circuit and after put everithing back as it was.

If the circuit is working properly, yours is performing better than mine.
You can leave it the whole night working and in the morning the battery will be the same voltage as the last measurement you did today.

Jesus
just tested a led across the collector and emitter. good light, all is working. removed led and will update you in the morn.

shubhamforme

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #559 on: May 29, 2009, 09:22:24 AM »
checked out everything and it dosent work.... this circuit does not work my battery still at .4v from 1.3v within 5 hrs

just tested a led across the collector and emitter. good light, all is working. removed led and will update you in the morn.

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #560 on: May 29, 2009, 01:59:36 PM »
checked out everything and it dosent work.... this circuit does not work my battery still at .4v from 1.3v within 5 hrs

If you are using a breadboard you should be sure that the led turns on as a normal Joule thief.
It suppose not to go down from 1,37v to 0.47.

Check with another battery to be sure that the joule thief is working properly.

Remember that the strip on the diode goes all on one direction. They are not arranged as a normal bridge rectifier.

Could you post a photo of your setup?

Jesus

shubhamforme

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #561 on: May 29, 2009, 02:59:35 PM »
sure buddy i'll post my setup pictue...but i am sure that everythings at right position but its still not working???
did yours worked???
pls u post pics of ur set up....and i'll paste main.... thx.

If you are using a breadboard you should be sure that the led turns on as a normal Joule thief.
It suppose not to go down from 1,37v to 0.47.

Check with another battery to be sure that the joule thief is working properly.

Remember that the strip on the diode goes all on one direction. They are not arranged as a normal bridge rectifier.

Could you post a photo of your setup?

Jesus

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #562 on: May 29, 2009, 04:19:40 PM »
@all

I made the camera to work!
The battery I am trying to repair is an AAA from my camera. It does not hold a charge.
It has been on treatment since last night and it does not take the charge.
The source battery is not drained on the process!!!

I have many very old batteries to experiment.

Jesus

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #563 on: May 29, 2009, 04:31:35 PM »
still @ 1.24v this morning. i'm going fishing for a few days, i will let you know what it's at when i get back.

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #564 on: May 30, 2009, 01:40:07 AM »
@all

Remember this?

Jesus

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #565 on: May 30, 2009, 01:50:02 AM »
@all

I really apologize. Please accept my apologies/
I finish my quest. I do not have Feedback to the source.

It is as simple as this:

Now the circuit changed its behavior and the LED stays on and discharging the battery on both switch positions.
That means that the whole behavior was a lose connection somewhere in the circuit that produced a constant loop to the battery.
I am tired now and I will not keep going on with these false successes I have had, I will post no more.
This was my gift and apportation to the free energy community and the world.
And I failed again. I cannot resist a third time. Sorry!!!

Jesus
« Last Edit: May 30, 2009, 12:44:15 PM by nievesoliveras »

FluxAmps

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #566 on: May 30, 2009, 03:51:14 AM »
Hmmm..... that's cool stuff Jesus my man, that you got going on there
I keep following your as ever so very well documented information.

thanks for sharing my man keep up the good work I'll be watching
trying to replicate whatever you will find

greets from amsterdam holland
Maurice

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #567 on: May 30, 2009, 04:00:56 AM »
Hmmm..... that's cool stuff Jesus my man, that you got going on there
I keep following your as ever so very well documented information.

thanks for sharing my man keep up the good work I'll be watching
trying to replicate whatever you will find

greets from amsterdam holland
Maurice

Thank you @fluxamps !

I could be wrong though. I have not tested it long enough and almost always this things give me some big surprises.

I pray that it keep working as it has been.

Jesus

Cap-Z-ro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3545
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #568 on: May 30, 2009, 04:10:52 AM »

I can't wait to see what you are going to do with this circuit jesus...your persistence seems to have paid off.

Congrats.

Regards...


nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #569 on: May 30, 2009, 04:16:45 AM »
I can't wait to see what you are going to do with this circuit jesus...your persistence seems to have paid off.

Congrats.

Regards...

Thank you @capzero !
Again, I pray that everything keep going well.

Jesus