Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Feedback To Source  (Read 387373 times)

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #210 on: February 02, 2009, 03:56:23 PM »
@all

During a test I left the joule thief connected to the pulse motor for a moment while I prepare the camera and the voltage rose to 14 volts without spinning the rotor.
I left a little more and it rose to 17 volts. Then to 19 volts.

Jesus

Edit:
On the photo appears with the @slayer007 idea of two toroids but it does the same with just one toroid coil
« Last Edit: February 02, 2009, 04:26:41 PM by nievesoliveras »

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #211 on: February 03, 2009, 01:39:06 PM »
@all
Willing to explore a little further I tried to run an extractor fan motor that once gave me a jolt of voltage when I put some voltage on two of its wires and tried to get a voltage reading on the other wires.

Jesus

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #212 on: February 03, 2009, 01:46:03 PM »
@all

I got 25 volts from a joule thief through the extractor fan stator. It did not run though.
The stator alone without the rotor. that by the way does not have permanent magnetism, and a 12 volt battery would make a good power source I think. I could be wrong though.

But I cannot get away from my principal goal that is, to get feedback to the source.

I will find something.

Jesus

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #213 on: February 04, 2009, 12:39:46 PM »
@all

This was the circuit used on the two toroids test.

Jesus

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #214 on: February 04, 2009, 01:13:51 PM »
@all

By the way. There is a new idea brought by @lidmotor that uses a peltier module with a rectifier and a 50F cap that can be used as an independent feddback to the source with the module placed under or over the magnetic field of the pulse motor coil or Joule thief toroid coil.

Jesus

tagor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1333
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #215 on: February 04, 2009, 06:46:39 PM »
There is a new idea brought by @lidmotor that uses a peltier module

do you know , where we can buy a peltier module ?

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #216 on: February 04, 2009, 10:50:44 PM »
@tagor

I have not tested this new device. Also I am not the one that invented it.
You can get one here:
http://www.mpja.com/prodinfo.asp?number=12326+PM

If you make experiments with it, please post results here if it is not an incovenience for you.

Jesus

rensseak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #217 on: February 05, 2009, 01:43:53 AM »

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #218 on: February 05, 2009, 04:59:13 AM »

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #219 on: February 05, 2009, 02:50:31 PM »
@all

For conversions from numbers such as 101, 102, 103, etc. to picofarads or viceverza
go to this link http://www.electronics2000.co.uk/calc/calccap.php

Jesus

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #220 on: February 05, 2009, 02:54:32 PM »
@all

I composed this other circuit variation and tested it.
It is based on @lidmotor idea.
The motor does not run if configured this way.
Maybe I am doing something wrong.
If @lidmotor sees this, please give some light on the matter.

Jesus

tagor

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1333
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #221 on: February 05, 2009, 04:32:30 PM »
Thank you @rensseak

Jesus

thank you very much

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #222 on: February 06, 2009, 03:27:44 PM »
@all

In the meantime I can solve some problems, what about dream a little bit with the free energy experimenter's dream.

Jesus

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #223 on: February 06, 2009, 04:15:00 PM »
@all

I feel very very sad!  The creator of the magnetic mill "Juan Carlos Moran" Died.
I received a dozen emails saying so.

He died at the age of 49 years (1960-2009). Very young. It is scary. I dont know how he died.
I wish ELIEVE has him on his side.

Jesus
« Last Edit: February 06, 2009, 04:41:26 PM by nievesoliveras »

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Feedback To Source
« Reply #224 on: February 07, 2009, 01:38:53 PM »
Thanks @mvmcman

I will post at least one of his graphics in honour of him. I think that he was a very controversial human being that was trying to help humanity with his magnetism knowledge.

Maybe someone will catch the magnetic equilibrium needed to accomplish his work.
If we could finish his work, we will not need to feedback to the source anymore.

Jesus