In the video, I think he said that Waterloo University tested the device.  He claimed 2600% overunity output.  It would be a rather large math mistake if it proved not overunity I would think.  Is there any statement from Waterloo University on the test that they made?

http://uwaterloo.ca/facultiesandcolleges/

Would that be the universities optometry department or the pharmacological department

Didn't see a physics department noted there .. but hey its a university right

http://uwaterloo.ca/facultiesandcolleges/

Would that be the universities optometry department or the pharmacological department

Didn't see a physics department noted there .. but hey its a university right

Just to be fair:
http://gradcalendar.uwaterloo.ca/default.aspx?groupID=1466
The university does have a PhD. program in physics, as well as ones in Electrical Engineering/Computer science.

Hey, RIchard, why not be more specific? What's the investigator's name, I'll give him (or her) a call and get the real story.

That being said, I still am feeling rather insulted by Richard's presentation. There's no real data, just some improbable claims, and that T-shirt!!

Hey Guy's

The University of Waterloo in Waterloo Ontario, is probably the best engineering university in Ontario, if not the country. I worked in the engineering department for a company that would hire Co-op students for summer work and we always tried to get a student from Waterloo. Anyone around here that wants to make a living in the engineering field knows that Waterloo is where to be trained. High school students require around an 85% average grade to be accepted into it (depending on which course, some courses require a higher grade).

For the DragDen investors, when your tax situation is bigger then your net returns, giving a million dollars for 50% of a corporation is great because if it works, it will return tremendously, and if it does not, the investors will have 1 million dollars of capital in the corporation that when closed will allow them to write it off in tax credits of 50%, or, they can always use the company in another business model to generate enough profit to pay themselves back completely. So they gave a million, but it actually cost them 500,000$. And this capital that they will put in will not be registered under magnacoaster's personal name but in the investors name (lol). So if it fails, Mag loses all and these guys lose 1/2. But they would have paid that much I taxes anyways. But that is only the financial side for investors and does not really worry me.

What worries me is the fact that for anyone to have ONE working OU device would already be a definite one in a million event, as he showed and claimed with his motor/alternator set-ups, then to junk that and make an about face and develop a totally solid state device that is also OU. Typical fraud tactics if you ask me. Just wait, once the heat starts building on him, he will come up with another device. He is asking 50% down payment. That's the money model. Pay half now and wait for life. lol

But what kills me is his "claim" of UofW doing tests and showing the device consumes 18 watts and puts out 50kwatts. What is he talking about? Does he think people are that stupid? So how was the 50kwatts served. 120 volts @ 416 amps, 240 volts @ 208 amps, 460 volts @ 108 amps, 1000 volts at 50 amps, 5000 volts @ 10 amps. How the hell was it served on the output side. Now let me ask this next question. Do you realize that at any of the above servings, the circuits involved just to switch the unit off would be twice as big as his unit. Can you imagine the infrastructure on the output side required. That box and all its wires would have fried a chicken is two seconds flat.

Then the next question to ask is, OK, what was the load. What did you plug into this device to measure 50kwatts output. Let me guess. A fully loaded 76hp electric motor. Yeh sure.

There was nothing there then, there is nothing here now, there will be nothing there tomorrow. This is the slogan he should use for his company. The only thing I can see from this is he is a totally delusional and pathological liar. End of story. Hmmmmmm. No where did I see this before?????????

My most puzzling and last question is, why the hell did I waste 10 minutes writing this? lol
Back to work......the show is over.
Let's make it real.

Do you realize that at any of the above servings, the circuits involved just to switch the unit off would be twice as big as his unit. Can you imagine the infrastructure on the output side required. That box and all its wires would have fried a chicken is two seconds flat.

I agree with most of what you say but don't let the above make you lean either way.
Controlling power to a load is as simple as controlling the field in the generator.

Example: I've worked with 750kW Kato generators that only required field power of less than 500 watts. Switch the field off and nothing goes to the load. Vary that field and control the voltage, therefore the power, going to that same load. (Residual field magnetism is usually too weak to drive a sizable load. Voltage can drop to zero without field drive. Then you need to flash the field or bump it with a magnet to get it going again.)

About like I see Tesla's electric car. Two carbon contact rods vary grid bias on two of three beam power tetrodes (one is left biased for full output while idling) and the three half-wave rectifiers were there to provide the DC drive voltage from the three phase output of the generator portion.

If the 'motor' in that car was a combination motor-generator (40 inches long? Jeez!) AND that motor portion's field voltage was controlled by these tubes AND the generator portion was configured to avoid the bad aspects of Lenz's law.... Well, lets just leave it there. All Tesla or this guy would need to do is give it an initial spin.

If this guy has something real then it is a repeat find of Tesla's electric jalopy.

I'm waiting for him to disappear completely. Then I'll know he was no fake.
 

@Ergo
Thanks - here is a correction to your calculation.
50,000 watts divided by 18 watts = 2777.77777% OU (OK his 2600 OU is conservative - yahooo). lol

@BEP

Yes, I get what you are saying but he is claiming a net output of 50kw or 76hp output. This is not relative to running a generator that has a field winding that gets excited at XXXX rpm to then produce 50kw output. This is equal to brute force 76hp output on a drive motor.

But, you should develop your ideas on the Tesla car. That sounds very interesting although I must admit it is somewhat above my understanding. There is a thread on it on the recent posts located here;
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6319.msg144069#msg144069

Oh, I just finished my set-up to wind a @handyguy1 coil to try his setup but non-moving. Can't wait to get it finished tonight. More fun. So many projects.

@BEP

Yes, I get what you are saying but he is claiming a net output of 50kw or 76hp output.

Actually it comes out to 67hp ( do u have slicksdexia like me? 

This is not relative to running a generator that has a field winding that gets excited at XXXX rpm to then produce 50kw output. This is equal to brute force 76hp output on a drive motor.

It certainly is IF he is circumventing Lenz.

But, you should develop your ideas on the Tesla car. That sounds very interesting although I must admit it is somewhat above my understanding.

Thanks for the link. Most folks think that tube box was some kind of magic. I had a discussion with some of those types in the past. Waste of time. They need to understand what was under the hood and stop worrying about what was in the dashboard.

My point is: I think this guy may actually have something. Don't sweep him under the rug for being a renegade. Most of the folks researching this stuff are exactly that. Hell, I have one rug that is my favorite 

I'll not dump on him just yet. If he is doing what I think then, yes. It is very possible there is no BS in his statements.

To whom did you speak ( please post names) and what did they say ?

Please people, especially the skeptics, don´t post here as if Richard would be a convicted fraud.
Otherwise  I will delete your postings.

Regards, Stefan. ( admin)

Perhaps.
If I knew some names, like for example if Richard would tell us some names, I would indeed make the call.
However, I do have some inquiries under way with "people who know people" in Engineering and Physics at U. of Waterloo. So we shall see if I can find out anything.

Meanwhile, I agree with Stefan, and I apologize if I seemed to accuse Richard of being a convicted fraud. It's too soon for that.

But seriously, Stefan, it sounds like you might need to change the batteries in your BS detector.