Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature  (Read 9875 times)

Neolystic

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« on: November 30, 2008, 07:56:16 AM »
"If ever we can ascertain at what period the earth's charge, when disturbed, oscillates, . . . we shall know a fact possibly of the greatest importance to the welfare of the human race." – Nikola Tesla

In my opinion, successful creation of a working TPU requires more than ‘just building something to see if it works’.  It requires:

1.   Development of one or more plausible theories as to where, exactly, the extra power comes from.
2.   Testing these theories with real-life bench tests, in order to prove or disprove them.
3.   Designing and building a device which specifically targets one or more of these power sources, using information discovered during the tests.

I believe this structured adherence to the scientific method is necessary because trying to build a TPU without a proven theory is like knowing where we want to go on a trip but having no idea how to get there.  It is my hope that this research will give us a map to get to our destination.

At this stage it is my intention to focus on external sources for power.  In an indirect way, the tests outlined below will also rule out most or all man-made sources of power, since the tests will be run inside a Faraday cage.  Three general sources of possible external power come to mind, although no doubt there are many more.  These are as follows:

1.   Muons or other cosmic particles
2.   Earth’s magnetic /gravitational field
3.   The Aether

Each of these theories will be addressed separately.  Real-world bench testing will follow the theories, including descriptions of the tests done and their purposes, which will be followed by the actual test results and finally, a conclusion.

Neolystic

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2008, 07:57:17 AM »
Muons as a Power Source

One thing that keeps sticking in my mind is that during some of his tests, Tesla said he was ‘manufacturing electrons'.  No doubt statements like this only added to the ridicule heaped upon him.  However, I believe he was right.  How could electrons be 'manufactured'?  With muons.  Muons are created in the upper atmosphere and rain down to Earth at near-light-speed velocities.  This is proven by their speed measurements and resulting time-dilation.  Mean muon lifetime is 2.2 ms, so the distance travelled in a typical lifetime would be around 660m, not counting relativistic effects.  Since they are created 15-20 km up, in the upper atmosphere, very few should ever reach the ground.  (See   http://teachers.web.cern.ch/teachers/archiv/hst2000/teaching/expt/muoncalc/lifecalc.htm for more information.)  However, they have been detected at a depth of at least 12 km below ground as shown here: http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-ex/pdf/9806/9806001v1.pdf

Muons are the most highly-concentrated non-atomic particle at sea level.  Normally they have to go at least 60 feet underground before they slow down enough to break down into their component parts.  When they do break down, they convert into an electron, a photon and other quantum particles. I think it is no accident that Tesla’s Wardenclyffe Tower had an extensive ground plane which extended several hundred feet into the ground.  If Tesla were trying to capture these ‘manufactured electrons’ this would have been the place to find them.  Of course he wouldn’t have known to call them muons, since the term came at a later date.

Muon energy could be harvested in one of two manners…either through a transfer of kinetic energy into a dielectric field as the muon passed through it, or through capture of the electron and photon at the moment of conversion from the muon into its component parts.  These two methods are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

In the case of kinetic energy transfer, we would expect the force from the collapse of the field to be greater than the force required to form it.  Specifically to the proposed tests, this would mean that the square wave’s overshoot at the trailing edge (at field collapse) would be greater than the overshoot at the leading edge (at field formation).
This relationship can be expressed mathematically as follows:

O+ = overshoot at the leading edge of the square wave
O- = overshoot at the trailing edge of the square wave
Delta = O-/O+, or the ratio of O- to O+.  Delta represents a net change in power contained in the collapsing field vs. power contained in the expanding field.  A number >1 here represents a net increase in power.

The second mechanism whereby muon energy may be harvested involves capturing their component particles at the moment of conversion.  As stated above, when muons slow down to a certain point, they break down into component particles.  The most common result from this breakdown is that the muon breaks down into an electron, a photon, and other quantum particles.

Actually capturing the muon components at the moment of conversion would operate as follows:
Dielectric fields are formed at faster-than-light (superluminal) speeds.  As the muons rain down, they collide with the leading edge of this expanding dielectric field.  As described above, kinetic energy is transferred from the muons to the dielectric field.  The result is that the muons are slowed down and the field collapses with greater force than used to form it.  Now let’s expand/collapse this dielectric field F number of times per second (as determined by frequency) at V field strength (as determined by the voltage used to create the field).  Each specific combination of F and V would target muons of a specific velocity, and those specific muons would break into their component parts in the area of the dielectric field.  At this moment, the wire would have a deficit of electrons because some of them had been ejected from the wire during the formation of the dielectric field.  This would cause the ‘manufactured’ electrons to be attracted towards this deficit and into the wire.  In addition, the energy from the ‘manufactured photon’ would be added to the total energy of the dielectric field.  Muons travelling at speeds faster than the field expressed by the particular FV combination would be slowed down, but not enough to cause their breakdown in the area of the dielectric field.  However, some of their kinetic energy would still be imparted to the ions in the field as described above.

Expected Test Results
Muons arrive at the Earth’s surface at widely divergent speeds.  If we are gaining power from muons through the mechanism of kinetic energy transfer,  we would expect O- to be greater than O+ at most any frequency and voltage.  This results in a Delta > 1, expressing a net energy gain.

If the component parts of a muon’s breakdown were being captured, we would expect to see a ‘dividing line’ with respect to frequency and/or voltage, above which we would see a nonlinear increase in the total power contained in the collapsing dielectric field as measured by O-.  Specifically, Delta, or the ratio O-/O+, would begin to increase in a non-linear fashion as the corresponding frequency or voltage increased, For example, a 10% increase in voltage would result in a greater than 10% increase in Delta, as more and more muon components would be captured and returned to the wire.  Tests with differing voltages have not been done as of yet.

Testing Methodology
All tests are run inside a 7ft x 3ft x 3ft faraday cage constructed of aluminum window screening.  A 14 gauge wire approximately 6 ft long is suspended horizontally inside the faraday cage.  A square wave generator feeds pulses into one end of the wire, and a digital storage oscilloscope reads the pulses on the other end, using a record length of 250K data points per sample.   Specifically, it measures the height (voltage) of the overshoot at the leading edge of the square wave, as well as the corresponding negative overshoot at the trailing edge of the square wave.  Technically speaking, measuring total power within O+ or O- would require measuring the square of the total area within O+ or O-, but this becomes problematic at higher frequencies due to the occurrence of reflective resonances bouncing back from the other end of the wire.  I have chosen to measure O+ and O- height (voltage) for this reason, as it should still give us a useful measurement of the relative strength of the O-/O+ ratio.

O- is defined as  [(Low-Min)/Amplitude] x 100%
O+ is defined as  [(Max-High)/Amplitude] x 100%

Where:
 Low = The most common value below the midpoint
Min = The minimum voltage found in the square wave
High = The most common value above the midpoint
Max = The maximum voltage found in the square wave
Amplitude = High - Low

The reason for the faraday cage is twofold.  First, it is necessary to eliminate man-made sources of electromagnetic radiation, in order to rule out the possibility of coupling with these frequencies which could distort the readings.  Secondly, we wish to avoid interfering with radio communications in the area.  Since muons travel at speeds which are beyond the Faraday cage’s blocking capabilities, muons will still be present inside the cage for measurement.

The test uses a Tektronix 4G samples/second digital storage oscilloscope, 4 channels, with math option.  The waveform generator is a Wavetek 271.  Both devices are controlled via their GPIB ports by a custom program written in Visual Basic.Net 2008.  (If anyone wants a copy of this program, let me know and I’ll send you a copy of the source code).  The program sends a command to the waveform generator to create a square pulse signal at 1 pps.  Then a frequency-dependent waiting period passes to give the scope time to settle in and take accurate readings of O+ and O-.  These readings are sent back to the program where they are stored and graphed.  Then the process is repeated for the next higher frequency. 

The frequency sweep is done in this manner to determine if there are certain frequencies which produce greater Delta values than others.  If such frequencies existed, and if they were in a narrow range, it could be theorized that the increased Delta could be caused through harmonic resonance with Earth’s gravity or magnetic fields, the Aether, or other source.  If no such frequencies exist, it can be theorized that the increased Delta comes from muon interaction, since most any frequency would cause transfer of kinetic energy from the muon to the ionic dielectric field, because of the divergent speeds which muons travel.

Test Results and Conclusions
Test results are shown below.  Tests show a consistent Delta >1 at all frequencies from 1 pps to around 1.1M pps (the maximum frequency tested at this time).  From this we can conclude that ‘something’ causes a dielectric field to have more energy when it collapses than the energy required to form the field.  I believe it is reasonable to theorize that this broad-spectrum >1 Delta is caused by muons and other cosmic particles cutting through the dielectric field as discussed above.

An interesting anomaly is in the area between approximately 100 khz and 225 khz.  Notice the difference in readings when the current flows from North to South vs when the current flows from South to North.  This may be a frequency range which interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field, and from which power from this mag field may be extracted.

A determination concerning whether or not we are capturing muon breakdown components cannot be made at this stage,  since all tests were run at the same low voltages.  Determination of this effect requires testing frequencies at varying voltages to determine linearity of increase as discussed above.

TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2008, 10:42:16 PM »


Quote
I believe this structured adherence to the scientific method is necessary because trying to build a TPU without a proven theory is like knowing where we want to go on a trip but having no idea how to get there.  It is my hope that this research will give us a map to get to our destination.


Yes, but there's a problem with road maps....they don't show everything.  And you know how guys are about asking directions.


Besides, destinations are often not what we think they are.


The many intrigues surrounding the greatest scientific 'finds' in man's history tell a revealing story.



Blessings in Christ,


TS

IceStorm

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2008, 07:23:27 AM »
Hi Neolystic,

                   One thing i dont undrestand about your test result is : how can you see a effect at such frequency. Just to aquire enought Data to be able to say there X Muon passing per hour a Y place it can take up to 1 week of sampling data because it not ALL muon who can reach the sea level but just very few. I dont think its what the TPU harvest, if there enought Muon to make usuable power from it , i think alot of electric device will have trouble to work with all that interference no :) ?

P.S can you elaborate a bit more about your experimental setup ?

Best Regards,
IceStorm

Neolystic

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #4 on: December 04, 2008, 05:46:18 AM »
@IceStorm

Thank you for your comments and I see your point.  Around 10,000 muons per square meter per minute reach the earth's surface, which equates to 166.7 muons per second.  Assuming a 2D field size (in the horizontal plane) of 1 meter and a duty cycle of 50%, there would be no way for each pulse in a frequency > 83pps to be affected by an average of even one muon.  There simply aren't enough muons coming down to account for the results I'm getting.  So the muon theory looks like a bust.

@All

This of course raises a number of questions:

1.  Why is the positive overshoot at the leading edge of a square wave 'shorter' than the negative overshoot at the trailing edge, over most all tested frequencies?
2.  Is this nothing more than an error in measurement methodology?  If so, what tests could be done to actually measure the force used to create an expanding field vs the force returned to the wire from the same field as it collapses?
3.  If the methodology is correct, does the difference in overshoot lengths really mean that the field is collapsing with greater force than the force used to create it?  If so where is the extra force coming from and how?

-Neo

« Last Edit: December 04, 2008, 06:44:10 AM by Neolystic »

Neolystic

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2008, 06:37:02 AM »
Here are 2 more charts using the same data shown above.  These charts show Delta, or the ratio of a square wave's overshoot height (O+) to undershoot height (O-), by frequency.  Values less than 1 are frequencies where O+ < O-, while values greater than 1 are frequencies where O+ > O-.

Barring problems with testing or equipment, it seems to me that one or the other of these (Delta < 1 or Delta > 1) must be frequencies where OU is available.

IceStorm

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2008, 07:02:24 AM »
@All

This of course raises a number of questions:

1.  Why is the positive overshoot at the leading edge of a square wave 'shorter' than the negative overshoot at the trailing edge, over most all tested frequencies?
2.  Is this nothing more than an error in measurement methodology?  If so, what tests could be done to actually measure the force used to create an expanding field vs the force returned to the wire from the same field as it collapses?
3.  If the methodology is correct, does the difference in overshoot lengths really mean that the field is collapsing with greater force than the force used to create it?  If so where is the extra force coming from and how?

-Neo




Hi Neolystic,

                  Its hard to answer your question with not enough detail about your setup. I dont need to see any schematic, i just want you explain how you do your test, ex :" I pulse X coil at Y frequency , i redirect the output in a cap etc etc". Just expose the basic if you dont want people fully understand what you do. That will be easier to help you after that.

Best Regards,
IceStorm

Neolystic

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #7 on: December 04, 2008, 07:15:28 AM »
@IceStorm,

My apologies for overlooking that part of your question.  The setup is as simple as possible.  There are no coils, no wire loops, no caps, and no circuitry (other than those in the square-wave generator and scope).  I have a 6 foot long, bare, 14 gauge copper wire suspended horizontally in a straight line which points north and south.  The wire is inside a Faraday cage.  The square-wave generator is connected to one end of the wire and the scope is connected to the other.  In the tests labeled 'North to South, the square-wave generator  is connected to the north end of the wire, and the scope is connected to the south end.  The reverse is true for the tests labeled 'South to North'.  The test starts out at 1 pulse per second, and the scope reads the overshoot at the leading edge of the square waves, as well as the undershoot at the trailing edge of the square waves.  These readings are recorded, then we move up to the next frequency, and the test is repeated.  The bottom of square waves are at +1V.  The top of the square waves are at +10V.  (Neither of these voltages include the overshoot or undershoot).

The purpose of the tests is to determine if there are frequencies which interact with nature in an anomalous way.  If such frequencies exist, and if they can be shown to draw power from nature, the next step would be to tune a TPU or similar device to those frequencies.

- Neo

IceStorm

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #8 on: December 04, 2008, 07:36:45 AM »
Hi Neolystic,
   
                  Essentially you dont measure the strength of the field but the Potential of the field with a oscilloscope, the Collapsing field  return only Potential so that equal a higher voltage than the initial voltage but with alot less current so the strength cant be greater. If you measure a increase in the magnetic field strength with a Gauss meter that will mean there someting affecting the field coming from outside.

A interresting note, as you know, when 2 coil get pulsed near each other, both coil will create a magnetic field and couple each other to make a bigger field , the interesting thing is if you just stop the second coil , just for a moment , the first one will retain that strength by itself even if the other coil is in off state.

Best Regards,
IceStorm


IceStorm

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #9 on: December 04, 2008, 07:45:19 AM »
@IceStorm,

My apologies for overlooking that part of your question.  The setup is as simple as possible.  There are no coils, no wire loops, no caps, and no circuitry (other than those in the square-wave generator and scope).  I have a 6 foot long, bare, 14 gauge copper wire suspended horizontally in a straight line which points north and south.  The wire is inside a Faraday cage.  The square-wave generator is connected to one end of the wire and the scope is connected to the other.  In the tests labeled 'North to South, the square-wave generator  is connected to the north end of the wire, and the scope is connected to the south end.  The reverse is true for the tests labeled 'South to North'.  The test starts out at 1 pulse per second, and the scope reads the overshoot at the leading edge of the square waves, as well as the undershoot at the trailing edge of the square waves.  These readings are recorded, then we move up to the next frequency, and the test is repeated.  The bottom of square waves are at +1V.  The top of the square waves are at +10V.  (Neither of these voltages include the overshoot or undershoot).

The purpose of the tests is to determine if there are frequencies which interact with nature in an anomalous way.  If such frequencies exist, and if they can be shown to draw power from nature, the next step would be to tune a TPU or similar device to those frequencies.

- Neo

The main problem i see with your setup is , because of the constraint of your single wire, even if there a anomalous event appearing, that will be in a nanoscale, the anomaly you get maybe is due to a Transistor or maybe a mosfet inside your frequency generator, people often doesn't look at that but there some capacitance in it, other component have similar effect too. I dont mean its the cause of the effect but you should look at it just to be sure.

Best Regards,
IceStorm

Neolystic

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2008, 08:09:27 AM »
Hello IceStorm,

I have a Gauss meter which can transfer its readings into a computer, but I believe it would only measure the magnetic field and not the dielectric field.  I suspect (but do not know) that any anomalies will occur in the the dielectric field.  My thinking is that the transients which occur at the edges of a square wave are caused by the following:

As a dielectric field expands, the charge itself expands at superluminal speeds, while the ions created from the initial charge expand at near-light speeds.  Once the voltage stops increasing, the dielectric field (being massless) stops its expansion immediately, while the ions continue expanding out for a short period of time as a result of their kinetic energy.  This short continuation of the ions' flight results in the increased voltage readings of the transient.  When the field collapses the process is reversed, and a short 'undershoot' transient occurs.  If this is the case, then the 'height' of the transients would seem to be an indicator of the strength of the field that was formed, at least relative to the same readings of other frequencies.  Also assuming that field strength is directly proportional to the potential used to form the field, this would result in a comparative field strength for different frequencies, where all frequencies are generated with the same voltage levels.

Concerning potential vs field strength, do you think the test would be more accurate if I measure the transient voltage as well as the current?  I have a Tektronix current probe ordered which is good for up to 50 Mhz, but it seems to be lost in shipping somewhere at the moment.  Do you have any other ideas/suggestions for measuring the dielectric field strength of the transients?  Do you think I'm on completely the wrong track? lol

Thank you for your consideration of this matter,

Neo

Neolystic

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #11 on: December 04, 2008, 08:14:50 AM »
The main problem i see with your setup is , because of the constraint of your single wire, even if there a anomalous event appearing, that will be in a nanoscale, the anomaly you get maybe is due to a Transistor or maybe a mosfet inside your frequency generator, people often doesn't look at that but there some capacitance in it, other component have similar effect too. I dont mean its the cause of the effect but you should look at it just to be sure.

Best Regards,
IceStorm

That is a valid concern.  I have a second frequency generator so I will work on modifying the program to work with that, and re-run the tests.  I've also considered using the frequency generator(s) to bias a vacuum tube so the tests could be run at much higher voltages.  This will require a much higher degree of shielding.  I used the single straight wire because I want to eliminate, to the greatest degree possible, any resonance, etc. from the results.

AbbaRue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2008, 08:43:22 AM »
When you see an anomaly in a certain frequency range it would be easy find
another source of this frequency range and rerun the tests.
This is an awsome study. 

I read that there is enough energy bombarding us from space to light 200,000 hundred watt light bulbs
for ever man woman and child on the earth. And that's 24 hours a day.
It would be awsome to find a way to tap into that vast energy storehouse.

duff

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #13 on: December 04, 2008, 04:00:13 PM »
Neo,

I assume your signal generator has an impedance of 50 ohms and you scope
around 10 Meg. Reflections could be playing a part in what your seeing.
Perhaps you could try changing the length of the wire and rerunning the test
and compare the two data sets.

Also, It would be interesting to see the responses in an east / west
orientation.


-Duff

Neolystic

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Connecting to the Wheelwork of Nature
« Reply #14 on: December 04, 2008, 04:44:28 PM »
I assume your signal generator has an impedance of 50 ohms and you scope
around 10 Meg. Reflections could be playing a part in what your seeing.
Perhaps you could try changing the length of the wire and rerunning the test
and compare the two data sets.

Also, It would be interesting to see the responses in an east / west
orientation.

The freg gen is 50 ohm and the scope is set to high impedance, which is 1 Meg. 

I agree that different lengths will need to be tested.  Concerning orientation, the plan is to test N/S, E/W, then || and = to the gravity poles (ie Bruce Cathie), as well as vertically (as per Tesla's 6 ft vertical wire on his electric car).  Lots of combinations here.  As per @IceStorm's suggestion, I'm also going to hook up my Gaussmeter to one of the scope traces for all the tests, since it does read both E and M fields.

I think what needs to be done next is to find a way to increase the voltage of the square waves so any anomalies will be easier to spot.  The problem is, how to do this with a flat frequency response.  Does anyone have ideas for a circuit to do this, or are we better off staying at low voltages to keep it as simple as possible?