Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms  (Read 32826 times)

supermuble

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« on: November 21, 2008, 05:46:12 PM »
I wrote this today to explain how a free energy transformer works. This also explains why a regular transformer always wastes electrical power. My terms could be wrong, but this explanation should serve well as a starting point for people who wish to experiment.

I got the idea mainly from Thane Haynes. His education on transformers has been beneficial.

Here is my simplified summary of free energy transformers:

Lenz’s law is the most important law to understand when producing free energy with simple electrical machines. If you can reduce the effects of Lenz’s law in a generator or motor, you can reduce the magnetic drag by 90% or more. When you reduce the drag, you improve efficiency.

Lenz’s law also applies to transformers. Because of Lenz's law, a  standard transformer can never produce free excess electrical  power to the secondary output. This fact is caused by the  secondary coil inducing an opposing magnetic force (opposing  flux) on the primary coil. If the primary coil has a reduced  magnetic flux, the inductance of the primary coil goes down, and  the coil begins acting more like a straight piece of wire. In a  straight piece of wire, the back EMF does not cancel the current  flowing into it like an inductor does. So as you increase load on  the secondary, an increasingly stronger opposing magnetic field  is created that prevents the primary coil from acting like a good  inductor. The more current you draw from the secondary, the  weaker the magnetic field in the transformer becomes. This  simply opens the door for more current to flow into the primary  causing heat and power loss.

If the secondary coil could receive the flux from the primary, then  you would be putting power into the secondary like normal.  However, if you could block the Lenz's law effect, you could stop  the load sensing ability of the primary. By avoiding Lenz's law, then  the secondary magnetic field would not serve to reduce the total  magnetic field of the primary. Instead, the secondary magnetic  field should be set up in a way that cannot interfere with the  primary. The secondary coil should be able to receive flux from  the primary, but it should not oppose the primary magnetic field. If  you can prevent the secondary coil's magnetic field (flux) to stay  clear of the primary's magnetic field, then the primary current will  not change in direct proportion to the load. The primary current  could be independent from the secondary load current. According  to Faraday's law of induction, you could then increase the speed  (frequency) of the magnetic field change in the primary coil,  which would induce more voltage and current into the secondary  coil. However, since the primary coil has a strong magnetic field,  and does not communicate with the secondary, very little current  will flow in the primary. As frequency increases, no extra current  is used, since the primary acts as an inductor. Yet, as frequency  increases, the secondary coil will put out more and more power.  The idea is to make the primary coil push flux into the secondary  coil, while preventing the opposing magnetic field of the  secondary to effect the primary. You need to create a magnetic  flux gate, whereby the primary field can travel to the secondary  without ever coming back. This can be accomplished by using  easily magnetized material for the secondary, and keeping the  secondary flux from escaping the secondary coil windings  (torroid core, E Core, EI core, etc. The primary coil should have  an air gap, and should be wrapped on a separate core that has  it's own flux path. This flux path should allow some of the  magnetic field to escape, so it can interact with the secondary.  However, the secondary magnetic field should not have any desire to interact back to the primary. If you use plenty of metal  on the secondary, the magnetic field will stay in the secondary. If  you use less metal on the primary, the magnetic field will escape  the primary coil, and it will create voltage and current in the  secondary. Since the primary core is smaller, and has a small air gap, the magnetic flux from the secondary has no desire to travel into the primary core.  You need to strike a balance so the primary still acts  like a good inductor, and resists current.

This is the idea behind removing Lenz's law from a transformer, and  creating free electrical power by applying Faraday's law of  induction. This applies to motors, generators and transformers. This law says you will increase the induced current  and voltage by raising the input frequency. By removing Lenz's law  from the equation, there is no relationship between the input  frequency, and the power consumption of the transformer. Yet, as  frequency increases, the induced power in the secondary coil is  increased according to Faraday's law.



Nali2001

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2008, 11:05:48 PM »
Hi there,
Good to see people thinking about Lenz solutions.

Although, I must say I tried this design and most of the other "lenz stays in the 'close looped' main core' setups again and again, and the bottom line is they don't appear ever to work like we want them to be. In your example the field from the input coil will just take (under output coil load) the right hand path and avoid the left hand coil path at all. If you induce your magnetic field in an output coil to cause some induction/output going on you will create Lenz in the same coil you got your output from... So how to separate these is a mind breaker. Induction and lenz are part of the same process. And the lines of force that induce the output power are always linked to you input source like a magnet or an input coil, so they always seem to be able to trace back to the input and hinder it. If you build your setup (and p.s. if you want any power out at all, you need a secondary output coil on the right hand side of the core) you will find that once you load the output side with a 50watt bulb or something it will lenz/load your input just like any transformer.

Still looking for the real deal o.u systems myself too..
Steven

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #2 on: November 22, 2008, 12:17:37 AM »

@supermuble

Maybe you have not seen this link: http://alexfrolov.narod.ru/ph-machine.htm

Basically it is the same principle you mention. And I agree with Steven's reasonings/findings.

If you assemble such a setup and say measure the self inductance of your input coil separately and then you place it into the outer closed core as you show in the drawing, you will find an increase in the inductance value. The smaller the air gap you make the higher the inductance of the input coil will be and this does indicate there is interaction between the the input and output in this setup. This is a simple but useful test for such setups for a start.

rgds,  Gyula

DreamThinkBuild

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 574
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2008, 01:41:59 AM »
Excuse my ignorance on this subject, I'm still learning and reading as much as I can. Would creating the secondary coils on a wheel and the primary stationary then spin the wheel at a RPM that would be tuned 90 degrees out of phase with the secondary(s). Would this eliminate some of the EMF on the primary? Before the primary gets a chance to be affected by the counter EMF generated by the Secondary it has already moved to the next non energized coil. Timing and spacing would be critical. Just a thought.

TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #4 on: November 22, 2008, 02:00:07 AM »
Quote
Although, I must say I tried this design and most of the other "lenz stays in the 'close looped' main core' setups again and again, and the bottom line is they don't appear ever to work like we want them to be.

Which is why Bearden and Co. ran into such difficulty, as the scale and timing issues via their approach, require good micro engineering skill.

Quote
Would creating the secondary coils on a wheel and the primary stationary then spin the wheel at a RPM that would be tuned 90 degrees out of phase with the secondary(s


My guess DTB, is that you are not far from leveraging lenz right out of a job and sending him back to law school.


TS

supermuble

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #5 on: November 22, 2008, 02:55:36 AM »
Hi guys. Great input. Thanks for the corrections. I was not planning on using the picture i made, it just an example of the concept.  ;D

If more people can think of transformers in a different way, we can make progress. it is very important for people to realize that a transformer can create excess electrical power. Electricity is usually always created by induction, and induction does not required a PHYSICAL OBJECT to create it. Induction is done with a magnetic field. We can manipulate magnetic fields without consuming energy. Magnetic fields seem to have less than 0 physical weight, so moving them should not require much energy, except what is lost in the electrical wires and circuits.

The books say that you absolutely have to have LENZ law in a transformer. But this is not correct. We need to be open to other methods!

According to a long standing Law of Induction by Faraday, you can increase current output and voltage by increasing the (rate of change) or RPM of the magnetic field. If you increase the frequency of a moving magnetic field, you can increase induced voltage in a secondary field. Increasing the frequency in an inductor does not consume any energy, so long as you can keep the back EMF intact to resist current.

I have not built any transformers, only motors. But I have found that by spinning a magnetic rod near a transformer, you can generate electricity with absolutely no Lenz law. Using a tiny electric motor, I was able to spin a 12" long magnet with no measurable resistance to rotation while inducing an electric current in the transformer. This may not be useful, but it does show the concept of inducing current without mechanical drag.

I am going to build some transformers. Since it sounds impossible to get it right, I won't expect much. But transformers are practically free to build. There is nothing to lose in experimenting right?


volypok

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2008, 02:43:38 AM »
Greetings from Kiev, Ukraine
let me share with you some findings that I have arrived at while figuring out how to "send Lenz back to law school" :-). I have used modeling software to verify my assumptions, so here we go.
Here's what magnetic flux looks like in an ordinary transformer with no load (again, to the best knowledge of contemporary physics as interpreted by software engineers :):
Let there be a primary coil of 100 turns wrapped around soft iron core. Inductance of the primary is 0.146471 Hn.

volypok

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #7 on: November 29, 2008, 02:59:11 AM »
Lets us now impose a load upon the secondary coil (of 100 turns same wire as the primary) with as little resistance, as though the secondary were short-circuited. A strong and opposing magnetic flux would virtually cancel out the inductance of the primary, decreasing almost 15 times to 0.009943 Hn. That's Lenz in action.

volypok

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #8 on: November 29, 2008, 03:00:53 AM »
Let me now introduce the following design. Primary is wound horisontally on the outside vertical bars of soft iron, 100 turns, inductance = 0.065282 Hn; whereas the secondary is wound vertically on the top and bottom parts of the additional oval shaped core.
As you may see in this case, magnetic flux from the primary has a choice of direction to follow - either vertically, closing on the opposing magnetic pole of the same core piece, or horisontally through the oval shaped core, closing on the opposing magneting pole of the other primary core piece. In this particular case 70% of magnetic flux follows the latter path, thus inducing EMF in the secondaries.

volypok

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2008, 03:11:44 AM »
If we short-circuit the secondary of such a transformer, equally strong and opposing magnetic flux would appear just as in previous case, however, it appears to be "caged in" inside the oval shaped core, with little influence on the primary flux. For the record, inductance of the primary in this example with short-circuited secondary decreases only 10 per cent to 0.058177 Hn.

Now, as you remember, there's only 70% of the original magnetic flux inducing current in the secondary, so what we have here seems to be a lousy transformer with COP of 50 per cent at its best. But if there's as little feedback from the secondary, as it is shown here, why don't we add a capacity in series with the primary to overcome self-inductance of the primary and let current flow freely between inductance and capacity, energizing our secondary with every oscillation?

I have not tried building this, but anyone with available time, skill, copper and soft iron :) is free to test it provided that he posts here the results. Who knows, perhaps it is time to appeal Lenz law :)?

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2008, 09:42:14 AM »
Let me now introduce the following design. Primary is wound horisontally on the outside vertical bars of soft iron, 100 turns, inductance = 0.065282 Hn; whereas the secondary is wound vertically on the top and bottom parts of the additional oval shaped core.
As you may see in this case, magnetic flux from the primary has a choice of direction to follow - either vertically, closing on the opposing magnetic pole of the same core piece, or horisontally through the oval shaped core, closing on the opposing magneting pole of the other primary core piece. In this particular case 70% of magnetic flux follows the latter path, thus inducing EMF in the secondaries.

Hi Volypok,

I am not a 100% sure on your coils placement. So the primary coil is wound completely outside (horizontally) and no any one turn of the wire enters inside the window of the oval, is that right?

Regarding the secondary coil,

1) is it ok to say you wind two normal coils at 12 and 6 o'clock positions onto the central oval closed core, meaning you enter into the center window of the oval with every turns just like as if you wind a normal coil into a normal toroidal core?

2) you do not enter the wire into the central window of the oval core when winding the secondary coil and you always guide the wire on the outside of the central oval core vertically, never entering the wire into the window at the 12 and 6 o'clock positions.

Which is the way you mean? I guess probably #2.

Which software do use for simulation, is it Vizimag?

Thanks
Gyula


volypok

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2008, 11:15:34 AM »
Hi Gyula,
thank you for your interest.
Yes, the primary does not touch the oval, it is would on the external cores only (shown in green).
Regarding the secondary coil your first assumption is correct - 2 coils at 12 and 6 o'clock just like as if you wind a normal coil into a normal toroidal core (dark red).
P.S. modeling software is ELCUT

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2008, 01:40:04 PM »
Hi Volypok,

Thanks for clarification on the coils now I got it.

I assume you used air gaps between the C cores and the oval core, right? 

Also I think the cross section areas of the oval core at 12 and 6 o'clock is made deliberately smaller than the rest of the core, so that flux from the primary should see higher reluctance through them, right?

I have not heard of ELCUT but now I searched and found QuickField, a more up-to-date version of it, for those not knowing them, see this link here: http://quickfield.com/  and the student version is freely downloadable here: http://quickfield.com/free_soft.htm  their latest version just came out last month. :)

Regards,
Gyula

volypok

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #13 on: November 29, 2008, 02:17:22 PM »
Hey gyulasun,

you are correct about air gaps between primary core and the oval. About cross sections at 12 and 6 o'clock - the best arrangement would be when 100% of the magnetic flux from the primary traverses these sections, I believe this should increase efficiency of the transformer.

supermuble

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
Re: How a Free Energy Transformer Works - In Simple Terms
« Reply #14 on: November 29, 2008, 06:14:42 PM »
Aren't we trying to make the flux path stronger (less reluctance) for the secondary coils on the larger core. On the primary, the flux path should have a very good path, but the flux path for the secondary should be even better so it cannot come back to interact with the primary causing Lenz's law. Right?

Here is a diagram similar to yours, it is the Thane Heins transformer. It appears that flux leaks out, but the canceling back EMF flux is not given much ability to directly oppose the primary flux.