Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 51   Go Down

Author Topic: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!  (Read 232388 times)

captainpecan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« on: November 17, 2008, 05:02:42 AM »
Here we go guys! Here is a good piece of my work. Enjoy!

Some will still not believe this is free energy. Some will finally realize what free energy is, and how to use it. And then some, already know most of this, and will be able to help the rest understand other ways!

I only ask, that before you debate my use of equations, please view all the videos. I do understand the proper use of them, but I do have a very good argument as to why they are not being applied correctly.

You will now know the true meaning of "Conservation of Energy"!  I hope my work inspires many of you to move forward. The video's are still not great quality, but the content is real.

Part 1  http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=1kK6WIslRNs
Part 2  http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=x1mq3NKCX9k
Part 3  http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ckqdguUvD2Y
Part 4  http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=WQEqvvkWnNg

[Edit -- update 12/8 --]

Poynt99 has done some impressive work explaining the voltage and energy transfer shown in these video's.
The following is his addition to this thread.

Capacitor Energy Transfer Experiments V1.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=item207
« Last Edit: December 09, 2008, 12:13:07 AM by captainpecan »
Logged

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2008, 05:12:17 AM »
awsome bro! 8)

great discovery!!!

do you mind if i add this  ;) ;D

ist

0   i think a magnet is still needed to start this unit...   to cause the first dump of the cap  8)  after 1 reveloution it is on its own .... :o

was some one looking for the cat chaseing its tale.... ;)

« Last Edit: November 17, 2008, 05:37:59 AM by innovation_station »
Logged

captainpecan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #2 on: November 17, 2008, 06:04:30 AM »
Looks good IST... Cant wait to see the progress!
Logged

nightlife

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #3 on: November 17, 2008, 06:28:26 AM »
captainpecan, you are not recording the amps and voltage is not good with out amperage.

 The first video you showed running the motor on 18 volts and then it stopped running but yet you showed have 19 volts still left. If it ran off 18 volts, it should have continued to run off the 19 that was still left. The reason why it didn't is because you used the amps and even though you ended with 19 volts, there was not enough amperage and therefore you really didn't gain anything and still had a loss.
Logged

capthook

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2008, 06:32:47 AM »
Calculate out the total charges.
Like you properly gave: 1/2(.0047x V2)

Start cap C1: .5(.0047x19.35x19.35)= 0.8799

after run

C1= 10.35 : 1/2(.0047x10.35x10.35)= 0.2517
C2= 9.57 : 1/2(.0047x9.57x9.57)= 0.2152
C3= 4.62 : 1/2(.0047x4.62x4.62)= 0.0502

C1+C2+C3= 0.5171

Net loss: .8799 (start cap) - .5171 (total of C1+C2+C3) = 0.3628

So you have a net LOSS of .3628.  About a 40% loss.

Just adding the voltages up on the caps doesn't work...

Thanks for the vids though!
Logged

captainpecan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2008, 06:53:55 AM »
Quote from: capthook on November 17, 2008, 06:32:47 AM
Calculate out the total charges.
Like you properly gave: 1/2(.0047x V2)

Start cap C1: .5(.0047x19.35x19.35)= 0.8799

after run

C1= 10.35 : 1/2(.0047x10.35x10.35)= 0.2517
C2= 9.57 : 1/2(.0047x9.57x9.57)= 0.2152
C3= 4.62 : 1/2(.0047x4.62x4.62)= 0.0502

C1+C2+C3= 0.5171

Net loss: .8799 (start cap) - .5171 (total of C1+C2+C3) = 0.3628

So you have a net LOSS of .3628.  About a 40% loss.

Just adding the voltages up on the caps doesn't work...

Thanks for the vids though!

I understand exactly what you are saying... but I did not compare it to the energy of the first cap alone. That was the point of the first of the video. At the first of the video, I took C1, and discharged it into three caps parallel, with no leads or components.  That is the energy that I compared the end experiment to.

The question is, why is there more energy left in the 3 caps running it through the circuit, than there was without the circuit, directly draining them in parallel.

In the last video, I did not compare one cap to 3... I compared 3 caps to 3 caps.. all in parallel the entire time.
Logged

captainpecan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #6 on: November 17, 2008, 06:59:40 AM »
Quote from: nightlife on November 17, 2008, 06:28:26 AM
captainpecan, you are not recording the amps and voltage is not good with out amperage.

 The first video you showed running the motor on 18 volts and then it stopped running but yet you showed have 19 volts still left. If it ran off 18 volts, it should have continued to run off the 19 that was still left. The reason why it didn't is because you used the amps and even though you ended with 19 volts, there was not enough amperage and therefore you really didn't gain anything and still had a loss.

The question is not amps. It's the total energy. And I know the equation says I have lost half my energy. The point is that I am getting the full amount of work on the motor, from each cap individually... After I already used the energy once to run the motor the first time.

By the way. It stopped running because it is a pulse motor and I only delivered 1 pulse. It was not supposed to keep running. The fact that the energy was left over for me to use again tells the tale. Equations true or false. This energy was recycled.
Logged

Michelinho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 452
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #7 on: November 17, 2008, 07:03:59 AM »

@captainpecan,

Nice work. I enjoyed the videos very much. Thanks.

Take care,

Michel
Logged

nightlife

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #8 on: November 17, 2008, 07:15:53 AM »
 Voltage with amps = watts. Voltage without amps = no watts. Power is based on watts or joules per second. You must have a watt gain to have any gain at all.
Logged

capthook

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2008, 07:23:40 AM »
Quote from: captainpecan on November 17, 2008, 06:53:55 AM

The question is, why is there more energy left in the 3 caps running it through the circuit, than there was without the circuit, directly draining them in parallel.


So you are thinking the 'circuit' is creating extra power you can harness?  Free energy?

Well - you commented on the (1) large spark when connecting the 3 capacitors in parrallel to "equalize" their charges.

There was (2) no such spark in the later test running it through the circuit.

So you lost more energy in the spark of (1) than you did running it throught the circuit (2).

Again - you need to measure (and fully calculate) energy in and then energy out.
No matter how you setup what you are doing - getting more out than in will never happen.

Logged

captainpecan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2008, 07:25:13 AM »
Quote from: nightlife on November 17, 2008, 07:15:53 AM
Voltage with amps = watts. Voltage without amps = no watts. Power is based on watts or joules per second. You must have a watt gain to have any gain at all.

You must not have worked much with capacitors. It's not the same. You would be correct, most cases I agree. But with capacitors, you measure total energy. Which is 1/2 * Capacitance * Voltage^2.  Yes, I mention only voltage early. But later I show what your concern is about. The total energy.

Thanks for your input though.
Logged

slapper

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2008, 07:25:15 AM »
captainpecan; thank you.

Still trying to figure out how you got 2 to = (1.1 * 2) plus do a little work on the side.

Thanks again.

nap
Logged

captainpecan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #12 on: November 17, 2008, 07:26:44 AM »
Quote from: Michelinho on November 17, 2008, 07:03:59 AM
@captainpecan,

Nice work. I enjoyed the videos very much. Thanks.

Take care,

Michel

Thank you!  It's not easy trying to go head to head with 100's of years of physics. I did my best.
Logged

captainpecan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #13 on: November 17, 2008, 07:30:11 AM »
Quote from: slapper on November 17, 2008, 07:25:15 AM
captainpecan; thank you.

Still trying to figure out how you got 2 to = (1.1 * 2) plus do a little work on the side.

Thanks again.

nap

Lol... I knew someone would be able to look past the equation crap and see the whole point of these video's... Good work...
Logged

capthook

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
Re: The Young Effect, my gift to the free energy movement!
« Reply #14 on: November 17, 2008, 08:02:46 AM »
Watched vid 4 again: your process is flawed

At the start you touch the leads of 3 capacitors together in hopes of getting a "control" figure.
You say "connecting them in parrallel with the least possible losses"

Again - I say the sparks flying when you do this is VERY lossy.

So comparing the 2nd test through the circuit - that is LESS lossy without all the sparks flying - as showing an energy gain is a flawed conclusion.

And you say "if you add the voltages together, which I say you can even though the equations say you can't"
That's your 2nd problem.
The equations are to determine an actual value of energy (joules : watts/second) - just adding the voltages to show a gain is wrong.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 51   Go Up
« previous next »