Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.  (Read 24538 times)

RYCOM COMPUTERS

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #15 on: November 12, 2008, 10:23:09 PM »
THANKS FOR THE VIDEO!  :o 


otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #16 on: November 13, 2008, 09:00:24 AM »
Hello all,

I can confirm that a TPU is able to transmit wireless energy. Its not a problem. My TPU was connected to a 12V car battery and transmitted around 6V to my power supply so the voltage rised from 24V to over 30V. When I connected a little bulb to the power supply I could see when I tuned my TPU that the bulb changed the light intensity. This was a pure wireless transmission of energy!!

But the guys from MIT I think are joking with the world. A wireless power transmission at a distance of how much??

Come on.

If I would work a little bit harder Im sure that I would have better results then they have. And they have a lot of scientists, money, various profi equipment.....and Im alone, and without money.

They got a financial "injection" and I got a big nothing. As I always say, Im a little man from a little country and they are the "big players" with their big brains.

Otto

PS: of course Im sarcastic because they forgot a man: TESLA


BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #17 on: November 13, 2008, 01:08:38 PM »
I strongly urge any body to do this experiment...just so that they can see that what Steven did was nothing like this set up....

ITS NOT VERY DIFFICULT AT ALL.

@Mannix,

Agreed, everyone SHOULD try the experiment. Once you get it going turn your receiver upside down. Guess what! The transferred power dies!

As long as MIT and Intel use magnetic coupling they will be limited to short distances and problems with multiple loads changing the overall system resonant frequency to multiple different frequencies.

I don't think Steven wasted any time on a transmitter. Why should he? The transmitted signal was already there. All he needed was a receiver.

I doubt MIT and Intel will get past the multi-load, distance, fading and redirection problems - even with all their brains and money. They'll never get past the frequency issue.

Intel should be ashamed calling their experimenter 'our own Nikola Tesla'. Just as well, they should be ashamed claiming it a new idea.

alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #18 on: November 13, 2008, 01:44:24 PM »
Hello all,

I can confirm that a TPU is able to transmit wireless energy. Its not a problem. My TPU was connected to a 12V car battery and transmitted around 6V to my power supply so the voltage rised from 24V to over 30V. When I connected a little bulb to the power supply I could see when I tuned my TPU that the bulb changed the light intensity. This was a pure wireless transmission of energy!!

But the guys from MIT I think are joking with the world. A wireless power transmission at a distance of how much??

Come on.

If I would work a little bit harder Im sure that I would have better results then they have. And they have a lot of scientists, money, various profi equipment.....and Im alone, and without money.

They got a financial "injection" and I got a big nothing. As I always say, Im a little man from a little country and they are the "big players" with their big brains.

Otto

PS: of course Im sarcastic because they forgot a man: TESLA


But is the wireless energy anything different than (harmful) high power RF ?

alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #19 on: November 13, 2008, 01:49:31 PM »
I been doing some research in the SM TPU. I am vary interested in the device. Today look at some other topics. I came across this web site. http://www.physorg.com/news100445957.html . Looking in to it a little I was thinking that if Steven Mark had done the same with the TPU but in a smaller scale.
"Instead of irradiating the environment with electromagnetic waves, it fills the space around it with a non-radiative magnetic field oscillating at MHz frequencies"
So no RF or EM @ MIT, just B fields.
With a longitudinal component?

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #20 on: November 13, 2008, 01:54:50 PM »
And what happens when you place a conductor in a changing magnetic field?

IMO:
At the frequencies they use think of it as using a giant cell phone. Sure, they aren't using cell phone frequencies but the frequencies are not what our bodies can accept. I think there will be energy transfer to our bodies as well.

Longitudinal? No doubt.

alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #21 on: November 13, 2008, 02:21:47 PM »
"No doubt, yes", or "no doubt, no"?
Non radiating mag fields, is that another word for scalar B?

I think it can be compared to tesla's wireless energy through the earth, but only using magnetic fields. The devices need to be tuned to the frequency, but what about things with a harmonic or aliasing resonant frequency, those also will (partially) resonate.

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #22 on: November 13, 2008, 02:39:53 PM »
No doubt yes.

I think they have it wrong. The radiation should be in the form of pressure waves.
Yes, the receiver must be resonant to the pressure wave. If I'm correct we are talking about a very narrow tuning range.
Agreed, power transfer should be almost zero for untuned circuits.

Harmonic, subharmonic and aliased should also receive. My concern is the possibility of anharmonic results.

alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #23 on: November 13, 2008, 03:11:05 PM »
anharmonics, like those of harddisks :)

I find this mag. pressure or scalar wave hypothesis very interesting, but know too little of it, only that it is like sound in a medium or pressure waves in water.
Got more info?

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #24 on: November 13, 2008, 03:22:17 PM »
Pressure waves....  Just think of it like sound waves. The oddities are source to receiver distance and matching resonance is key. Unlike transverse amps and volts stay together (no leading/lagging) so power only appears while in the peak.

Use HF/VHF and those nodes are narrow.

Plenty of stuff on the web. Most of what I know comes from my bench.

alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #25 on: November 13, 2008, 03:32:50 PM »
You got Posts: 666  ;D

But the existence of such waves imply the existence of a medium, like....the ether?
What are your findings from the bench? Have you seen scalarwave effects?

Many scientists regard this as pseudoscience, but many of these people are too much in love with what they've learned to disregard it as incomplete, I guess.

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #26 on: November 13, 2008, 03:56:33 PM »
Funny things or houdini magic tricks you can see here (22-25min) http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=167210479374903373&hl=en
W.

got a ?

on the way back into the house in that in that vid....  lol   what does michel look at?....  with the cam....   not an antenna.... :D

ist

if it is ... it sure explaines a lot lol.....

RYCOM COMPUTERS

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #27 on: November 13, 2008, 04:19:43 PM »
IN THE VIDEO


00:08:27:20 – 00:08:37:07  Why does he not pick up the last two lights?

00:22:47:12- 00:23:35:14   The camera guy never looks behind him, and then they walk out side, but keep in mind where there heading. Across the street which is still In Line Of Sight.

Some one please look at this and tell me what you think?

RYCom Computers

RYCOM COMPUTERS

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #28 on: November 13, 2008, 04:23:58 PM »
Oh and What is that device at 00:24:09:24  Could it be?  ;)

RYCom Computers

RYCOM COMPUTERS

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: MIT vs. Steven Marks TPU.
« Reply #29 on: November 13, 2008, 04:37:37 PM »
In his talking of the TPU at 00:34:51:29 -00:35:12:00  The audio cuts out. (Can some one say Edited.)  ::)


RYCom Computers