Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)  (Read 299651 times)

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #390 on: February 23, 2010, 08:56:06 AM »
@Loner

I dont care about to use right terms. What means skin effect?

Thats current or what ever  on the surface on a wire? Not enough for me!

Yes, Im thinking in the "particles way" so I can better understand whats going on in pulsed coils. As I never saw an electron Im using the term "particle". In some coils there are positive particles and in some coils they are negative or even mixed.

Particles ARE the base of true electricity in pulsed coils. If you can collect enough particles, you can use them. You  can feel them, they exist. You can make them visible and you can hear them. This particles are for real.

Im not talking about a theory, Im talking about what I see every day.

Otto




otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #391 on: February 24, 2010, 07:02:29 AM »
Hello all,

@Loner

surface effect is a totally wrong term. Better is "explosion effect"!! When a pulse hitts a coil particles are fired out of this coil in ALL directions!! Thats the truth. Thats the reason when you pulse a coil and after a few hours of work you feel soooo bad....thats the reason why you see the voltage from your power supply rising....

Easy to prove. At least for me.

Yes, at lower frequencies are not so much particles released and at higher frequencies we have much more of this released particles. Thats fact and logic.

As I already said Im using the term "particle" for something that other would say "electrons" or....you name it. And I said, I never saw an electron but my particles I can make visible. If I would tell you how you would say that I see  oridinary electrons but....I think the name is not important. What counts is their behaviour and without such a knowledge we are not able to understand whats going on in pulsed coils or wires not to mention pulsed sets of coils.

Not to bother anymore here, just try to accept the fact that when a pulse hitts a coil "something" very powerfull is fired out of this coil in ALL directions.

Yes, Im here also only a guest and cant shut my mouth but maybe somebody clever reads my words and maybe I helped just a little bit....you never know.

Otto


onthecuttingedge2005

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #392 on: February 24, 2010, 07:13:19 AM »
you can not get a two for one electron but you can get a two for one Photon, the Photon is the only particle you can get a two for one sale on at your local Electron super-saver. sorry for the analogy.

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #393 on: February 24, 2010, 07:24:58 AM »
So particles are exploded from the coil. Are we to collect these particles? Or are they just a thing that happens when you get it right and they dont mean anything really?

Mags

onthecuttingedge2005

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #394 on: February 24, 2010, 07:35:38 AM »
So particles are exploded from the coil. Are we to collect these particles? Or are they just a thing that happens when you get it right and they dont mean anything really?

Mags

it really depends on what particle you are taking advantage of. electron amplifiers only recycle already electrons in use while photon amplifiers actually produce two photons for one. like I have been preaching, Photons are the future because the photon is the only particle you can get two for one from an electron of a specific type.

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #395 on: February 24, 2010, 07:52:48 AM »
it really depends on what particle you are taking advantage of. electron amplifiers only recycle already electrons in use while photon amplifiers actually produce two photons for one. like I have been preaching, Photons are the future because the photon is the only particle you can get two for one from an electron of a specific type.

hi sir  goodday

i got 3 electrons for 1 using aluminum and carbon   ;)

thats why i have a lot of current. it even burn my lab in this experiment. lol  ;D

i think it depends on the material and the arrangement design of the circuit sir correct me if i'm wrong sir.  ;D


Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #396 on: February 24, 2010, 08:07:12 AM »
Hey teets
Could you point us to an example of aluminum and carbon? I have looked for this stuff but I dont see.

Thanks

Mags

onthecuttingedge2005

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #397 on: February 24, 2010, 08:11:19 AM »
hi sir  goodday

i got 3 electrons for 1 using aluminum and carbon   ;)

thats why i have a lot of current. it even burn my lab in this experiment. lol  ;D

i think it depends on the material and the arrangement design of the circuit sir correct me if i'm wrong sir.  ;D

Hi Tito.

Electron amplifiers only recycle their existing electrons in circuit, they can't actually give you two for one of 'different' electrons unless you pump more in, Photons are the only particle you can get two for one 'from' an electron. it is a type of over unity that is just giving birth. I know it is a bit to follow but it is the truth. with two photons I can effect two electrons and the multiply the effect.

this tech is really in its birth stages but trust me it will surpass all other techs once mastered. it all comes down to light!

see, Electrons have a limited potential when it comes to being stored, they have charge which limits their ability to be on any given surface area without effecting the other, Photons do not have this characteristic.

I can fit all the photons in the universe inside a thimble and even smaller, Electrons can never compete with the photon in this area.

the current photon tech is not quite yet been mastered but one day it will be and it is the right direction in achieving google-watts of energy inside an area the size of your thumb. electrons could never achieve this on their own.

I am sorry you are stuck in such a primitive age.

allcanadian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #398 on: February 24, 2010, 08:16:13 AM »
@Loner
Quote
As you can see, I have been VERY skeptical for a long time, and have begun to throw away a lot of what I was accepting as "Fact", simply because
the proofs were "Told" to me in schools, etc.  Now I have become a
lot like what you talked about.  I need to "See" it to believe it, but
it all gets confusing when, as I said, what does that really mean?

I think you are on the right track and on topic, in his later years Tesla stated something to the effect that-- there is no energy in matter not given to it from it's environment. If this is the case then perpetually wondering about electrons and photons may not be the answer. As well maybe we have become too occupied with the circuit itself and it's properties when we should be just as concerned with how the circuit interacts with "everything" around it and what this "everything" is. In any case I have made much more progress in understanding and experiments once I understood that there is more to consider than just conductors and electrons.
I like this ----
Quote
The hardest part for me was to accept that electron
movement, which many describe as "Current", is an effect.
It is hard but it gets much easier, you are going to be in for a very big surprise soon if you keep learning at this rate.
Regards
AC

onthecuttingedge2005

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #399 on: February 24, 2010, 08:24:02 AM »
@Loner
I think you are on the right track and on topic, in his later years Tesla stated something to the effect that-- there is no energy in matter not given to it from it's environment. If this is the case then perpetually wondering about electrons and photons may not be the answer. As well maybe we have become too occupied with the circuit itself and it's properties when we should be just as concerned with how the circuit interacts with "everything" around it and what this "everything" is. In any case I have made much more progress in understanding and experiments once I understood that there is more to consider than just conductors and electrons.
I like this ----It is hard but it gets much easier, you are going to be in for a very big surprise soon if you keep learning at this rate.
Regards
AC

Every element has the ability to amplify photons if you know the right frequency deliverance of photons, it is the correct frequency that makes the difference in the appropriate atmospheric environment whether gases and or solid!

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #400 on: February 24, 2010, 08:56:06 AM »
Hey teets
Could you point us to an example of aluminum and carbon? I have looked for this stuff but I dont see.

Thanks

Mags

@mags
You can find that from bruce perrault papers.

@onthecuttingedge

i think you are right sir, and i am very flexible to look on that tech, i beleive there is always room for improvement in me, and promise you i will not stuck from primitive age  ;D

But sometimes a simple problem needs only simple solution, and a specific right medicine for a specific illnesses.  ;D

i'am fun of making very simple things but gives tremendus result. i do not want complicated method but i can learn that one  8).

and if i learn that one maybe i can make it more better  :-\

i am actually finished in this free energy thing, i am now focusing in anti gravity and laser technology.  8)


Yes, photons are unlimited but if in your source the electrons flows and moves freely and use it and dissipate it freely i think no more difference with them.

since they both possess the energy effect its up to us how we use them ok.


 

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #401 on: February 24, 2010, 09:02:24 AM »
Cuttingedge
So are you saying that photons is what tesla was using, or are you saying teslas stuff did not work?
If Tito has what he says, and understands it, then it is us who are primitive and he is on top.

Its cool to ponder what will be, like photon energy and all, ideas are ideas. The idea of a laser was thought of way before it was actually made.
Here is a question for ya, A ruby pulse laser, is the output more than the input?  I would have to say so. But it is not sustaining unless we can convert the energy in the beam back into the flash pulse that started it all.
So your future is now.
But if tito says he has an electron multiplier, that is another thing. Just as some may not dig your concept, just as you are not digging theirs, doesnt mean that both dont exist. =]

Thats why we are all here.To find ,figure ,test, share and I would hope for most, to make this world a better place.
With energy problems out of the way, we all would have much more to spend on other stuff.
This is why I lean toward a safer form of ideas rather than super high freq magnetic waves and high voltage Bap Bap of the occasional lightning bolt. These things are just what might shut this type of free energy down by law saying its dangerous. Even though we have our microwave ovens and gallons of gasoline in our cars at 80mph, they are apparently safe to cook with and be around. But that doesnt mean they wont pull a global warming scam on a TitoGen.
It has to be safe, even if it is open source. If Teets did fully share and we all here had made and used the device and it started to spread world wide, I can see laws come into effect that would make it risky to do so even for ourselves.
Like the TitoGen, does it emit a detectable signal that can be located by govt or whom ever? Well that would have to be delt with to keep it on the down low.
" Roger central, we have located the signal and we have confirmation from the Bap Bap sensor that there is a Freegen being used at this location. Were going in."

So my goals are the same but I have reservations on the way it is done. Not that I dont want to know how Teets is doing it, because just the understanding of it will open doors.

Mags

onthecuttingedge2005

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #402 on: February 24, 2010, 09:21:21 AM »
Cuttingedge
So are you saying that photons is what tesla was using, or are you saying teslas stuff did not work?
If Tito has what he says, and understands it, then it is us who are primitive and he is on top.

Its cool to ponder what will be, like photon energy and all, ideas are ideas. The idea of a laser was thought of way before it was actually made.
Here is a question for ya, A ruby pulse laser, is the output more than the input?  I would have to say so. But it is not sustaining unless we can convert the energy in the beam back into the flash pulse that started it all.
So your future is now.
But if tito says he has an electron multiplier, that is another thing. Just as some may not dig your concept, just as you are not digging theirs, doesnt mean that both dont exist. =]

Thats why we are all here.To find ,figure ,test, share and I would hope for most, to make this world a better place.
With energy problems out of the way, we all would have much more to spend on other stuff.
This is why I lean toward a safer form of ideas rather than super high freq magnetic waves and high voltage Bap Bap of the occasional lightning bolt. These things are just what might shut this type of free energy down by law saying its dangerous. Even though we have our microwave ovens and gallons of gasoline in our cars at 80mph, they are apparently safe to cook with and be around. But that doesnt mean they wont pull a global warming scam on a TitoGen.
It has to be safe, even if it is open source. If Teets did fully share and we all here had made and used the device and it started to spread world wide, I can see laws come into effect that would make it risky to do so even for ourselves.
Like the TitoGen, does it emit a detectable signal that can be located by govt or whom ever? Well that would have to be delt with to keep it on the down low.
" Roger central, we have located the signal and we have confirmation from the Bap Bap sensor that there is a Freegen being used at this location. Were going in."

So my goals are the same but I have reservations on the way it is done. Not that I dont want to know how Teets is doing it, because just the understanding of it will open doors.

Mags

there are no electron multipliers in the sense that a new electron is created from an existing electron, this is absurd. the only known particle in existence who can do this is the photon. Electrons are only 'recycled' to amplify their presence.

like I said in the past, learn more on how to manipulate photons, in the end there will be nothing better. of course there will always be those who beg the differ but I promise you you will be on the right path.

most people are fooled by the disillusion effect at low energies that an electron by itself can deliver everything one needs but photons can energetically manipulate more than one electron at the same time if the frequency is correct and only if you know everything about that photon and know how to control it absolute.

as the gods once said, in the beginning there was light.

I say this is the way to control matter absolute once all the frequencies are matched to all matter and utilized.

I am a purely scientific individual, I don't believe in any known god. I just study their effects on everything else.

Tito L. Oracion

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #403 on: February 24, 2010, 09:40:23 AM »
there are no electron multipliers in the sense that a new electron is created from an existing electron, this is absurd. the only known particle in existence who can do this is the photon. Electrons are only 'recycled' to amplify their presence.

like I said in the past, learn more on how to manipulate photons, in the end there will be nothing better. of course there will always be those who beg the differ but I promise you you will be on the right path.

most people are fooled by the disillusion effect at low energies that an electron by itself can deliver everything one needs but photons can energetically manipulate more than one electron at the same time if the frequency is correct and only if you know everything about that photon and know how to control it absolute.

as the gods once said, in the beginning there was .

I say this is the way to control matter absolute once all the frequencies are matched to all matter and utilized.

I am a purely scientific individual, I don't believe in any known god. I just study their effects on everything else.

hi cut

i think electron multiplier is not the right word but electron producer maybe the right word.

actually the right frequency is not a big deal in my circuit, i just use it to minimize some module actually.

and if you are using photons to get electrons then that is your way of producing electrons right?  and i admire you with that and i have other way to produce electrons. still we both use these electrons, what a funny ha!ha!ha!ha!

if there is no electron multiplier, what is photon? lol ha!ha!ha!ha!

i think its just a misunderstanding of what we have ok.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2010, 10:09:04 AM by Tito L. Oracion »

onthecuttingedge2005

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter (amplify electricity)
« Reply #404 on: February 24, 2010, 10:00:03 AM »
hi cut

if there is no electron multiplier, what is photon? lol ha!ha!ha!ha!

If we break down an electron and a positron we get two photons at .511 MeV which together require 1.22MeV Photons to exist, so what are you saying?

anything that has an anti particle requires photons to exist. photons rule all of this world and or dimension.