i think youll find its going to be around the corner for a veryyyyyyy longgggggggg time.

Check out the 3-6-9 charger in the news section of the forum.

Two phenomena;
Faraday's law is a single equation describing two different phenomena: the motional EMF generated by a magnetic force on a moving wire (see Lorentz force), and the transformer EMF generated by an electric force due to a changing magnetic field (due to the Maxwell–Faraday equation).

James Clerk Maxwell drew attention to this fact in his 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force. In the latter half of Part II of that paper, Maxwell gives a separate physical explanation for each of the two phenomena.

A reference to these two aspects of electromagnetic induction is made in some modern textbooks. As Richard Feynman states:

So the "flux rule" that the emf in a circuit is equal to the rate of change of the magnetic flux through the circuit applies whether the flux changes because the field changes or because the circuit moves (or both) ...

Yet in our explanation of the rule we have used two completely distinct laws for the two cases – v × B for "circuit moves" and ∇ × E = −∂tB for "field changes".

We know of no other place in physics where such a simple and accurate general principle requires for its real understanding an analysis in terms of two different phenomena.

— Richard P. Feynman, The Feynman Lectures on Physics 
The reason for me posting this is a logical one, the two forms of EMF generation ARE NOT THE SAME. the Transformer equation is bound by the conservation of energy, EMF generated by a Motional Electric Field are NON CONSERVATIVE and therefore can produce above unity in which a Transformer can NOT.

  "The Maxwell–Faraday equation is a modification and generalisation of Faraday's law that states that a time-varying magnetic field will always accompany a spatially varying, non-conservative electric field, and vice versa."

say that again....... NON - CONSEVATIVE Electric field. meaning a Motional Electric field does NOT conform to the Laws of Conservation of Energy and thus a system can be contructed that takes advantage of this very fact.

The Figuera system is such a device that once started it can and will power it's self and the load a standard generator and standard Transformer can NOT.
This applies to the standard off the shelf transformer ONLY as there are steps to side step this fact and the 1932 Coutier device does just that as does a few others..

Regards,
Marathonman

The 1932 Coutier device will be the easiest and cheapest to build.
Marathonman

e2matrix;
A 12 or 24 volt to 120 or 240 volt converter can be the driving force pushing the first center core with maybe a power resistor or Rheostat possibly to keep it at say 1 amp. then at the middle feed back can be stepped down to the original 12 or 24 volts aided by caps and such.
I think the whole key is a few things like the outer cores must equal the center core plus the outer cores must have the same winding count as the center core. then on top of that the wire must get thicker in each set progresses.

each outer core will pick up 1 amp from the center core then paralleled to attain 6 amp.
saturation is the enemy in this device as it will clip the wave form.

Marathonman

Thanks for the additional info.   Sounds a little bit like one of Don Smith's devices - the one with multiple resonant coils surrounding one center coil.

I'm assuming you're referring to Donald L.

yah, back in 85/86 I think, tried to reproduce it when I was about 12, but there was some pretty weird things going on that made me think something was hinky, I haven't tried since, maybe after I'm done with my current project, I'm about a month from final completion of a scaled up version of my "A-1C", (using my washing machine motor), looks beautiful, works better, so excited to take it to University of Mobile to have it certified by the E.E. department, tee hee

And each time you add a coil to the outside of the center coil you increase the amount of current drawn by the center coil.  Simple transformer action.  NO OU.  Why don't some of you people try to learn at least the basics of electronics before you go claiming something is OU?