sorry rosemary, i was not intentionally ignoring you. i replied to some posts and then had to leave. i'm not quite sure where this posted copy of the thread is that you want my assistance with. i checked my pm's and my email and did not find any correspondence from you.

Thank God.  And THANK YOU WILBY.

I'll PM YOU. 

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

Rosemary i'll keep a copy for you. I'm not sure what the history is here but if all you want to do is make sure that there are multiple copies of your thread in existence then count me in. I've seen a lot of praise for your work so it must be worth keeping.

Hi DeepCut.  I'm not sure how long this window of opportunity is going to be available to me.  I'm reasonably certain that I'll get banned here - within the foreseeable furture.  Certainly it's going to be near impossible to refer to those results that have been obtained - first to prove the thesis - which experiments were validated by many reputable labs - and then the replication - that Glen and Harvey et al are all trying to hide.  Apparently also with the active co-operation and assistance of Stefan.  Surprising when you think that this is probably the ONLY time that those energy barriers have been breached with absolute due and proper record and measurement.

What I'm hoping to get done is the duplication of the thread onto whatever forum - frankly in whatever way possible - and then LOCK that thread - or that forum.  If that can be done?  The more that are posted the better.  If you have friends who could do the same - then please get them to do it.  If we get a mushrooming evidence of that thread that Harti's going to delete - then we've got a chance of keeping that information alive and in the public eye.  And then, too I think that the public will begin to realise how URGENTLY do these horrors - these SUPPRESSORS OF THE TRUTH try to HIDE this good news.   

We've got results due from campus that will absolutely drown out opposition - but I very much doubt that we can risk putting it on the INTERNET first off.  I've learned a very hard lesson.  I think the best way to go is straight to the press.

So.  In whatever way you can help - it'll be a good thing.  I've started a blog.  Here's the link. 

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/

Not much on it yet.  But maybe you could try and alert people to its existence.  It'll hopefully be an overview of the thesis and I intend posting our own Quantum paper and the Open source collaboration that turned into the farce that Glen and Harvey orchestrated.  Anyway.  Try and spread the word - wherever you can manage - and obviously only if you have the time.  The work is definitely NOT my work.  It absolutely belongs to us all.  NO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS WHATSOEVER.  And it needs to stay that way.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

Howdy reading Members and Guests,

Does anyone know the meaning of the word "perjury" ??   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury

Perjury, also known as forswearing, is the willful act of swearing a false oath or affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to a judicial proceeding.[1] That is, the witness falsely promises to tell the truth about matters which affect the outcome of the case.

The rules for perjury also apply when a person has made a statement under penalty of perjury, even if the person has not been sworn or affirmed as a witness before an appropriate official.

What we have here is a "SWORN" legal affidavit to Scribd from "Rosemary Ainslie" on a Copyright dispute of a document ( Scribd )  doc/26240411

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Legal%20-%20Notes/Scribd/Ainslie^_Affidavit^_Scribd.pdf   (verifiable)


We have a Tektronix e-mail about the equipment used in the "Open Source" testing and evaluation events -

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Legal%20-%20Notes/Tektronix/Request^_for^_return^_due^_to^_misleading^_intent.pdf   (verifiable)


We have documents (doc/26240411) taken down by IEEE on Scribd with the note displayed "This content was removed at the request of IEEE" up loaded by aetherevarising  ( aka Rosemary Ainslie )

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/100130-071433-GLEN-01-Final-Draft

***************************************************************************************************
 


What IEEE does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business with Scribd.

What Tektronix does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business with Scribd.

What Scribd does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business.

But being my name is on the  "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie it's my business also with the unfounded unproven allegations and possible slander ....... and I do know what the meaning of "perjury" is .....
 

Regards,
Glen

If you're gonna accuse the owner of the forum of collusion, I agree you're going to get banned Rosemary. He's deleting all of their stuff too, you know.

Happy you're right and I suspect that I'm out of line.  For that I apologise.  But I CANNOT understand why that thread needs DELETING.

I just cannot get there.  LOCK it.  Don't DELETE it.  Do you realise that I made public domain disclosures on our magnets that will now be lost?  Quite apart from the work itself?  And the thesis?  And my readership was NOT small.  On the contrary.

Anyway.
Rosemary

added BTW  -  What work of their's is he deleting?  By their work I presume you mean Glen's work and Glen has NEVER posted his work here.  He's posted links that - on the old thread related to deleted files - and on my thread work that relates to denial of the technology.  Nothing suits them better than to remove all reference.  Golly.  I thought you at least understood that much.

Happy you're right and I suspect that I'm out of line.  For that I apologise.  But I CANNOT understand why that thread needs DELETING.

I just cannot get there.  LOCK it.  Don't DELETE it.  Do you realise that I made public domain disclosures on our magnets that will now be lost?  Quite apart from the work itself?  And the thesis?  And my readership was NOT small.  On the contrary.

Anyway.
Rosemary

added BTW  -  What work of their's is he deleting?  By their work I presume you mean Glen's work and Glen has NEVER posted his work here.  He's posted links that - on the old thread related to deleted files - and on my thread work that relates to denial of the technology.  Nothing suits them better than to remove all reference.  Golly.  I thought you at least understood that much.

He's deleting their endless flaming. My personal advice is, ignore them, no one cares what they post except themselves. They've convinced no one of anything and you've defended yourself enough. 

@rosemary

Hi , good luck ...

I would like to say that your tread if deleted will be because of the behavior of the people in it more then the content , this is you invention , the responsible thing is to save all your info your self .

You are not banned , and could re post your info .

Some times we are responsible for our success , i have seen tread titles of your that were invitation for overflow of criticism , think 20 time before editing any comment , it always cast doubt about real intent because something is missing , and because someone got cut off , it is a NO NO.

You want people to work with you , you need to disclose everything down to wire gauge , part number , trade secret ,everything , otherwise you are not at the right place , plus it only leads to more problems people can't replicate doubt sets in not good , plus its a question of respect , i see that you spend time arguing , that time should be spent on explaining and showing .

Frankly , i never even bothered looking into your tread because there too much thing surrounding it .

It you really do this for the benefit of everyone then you don't need your name associated with it , knowing you made a difference is enough , Using your full name for user id , show some search of recognition that smells like a Ego , people do like that...

Those are my suggestion , good luck ...

Mark     

Mark, Thank you for your honesty.  I realise you share this opinion with many others.  I have a very strong readership here - but it is certainly NOT amongst its members or, in any event, its more active members. 

Regarding the naming of the threads.  I have absolutely NEVER started a thread here at OU.com.  I would not know how to.  I do not have the internet skills.  You will notice that the first thread was started by TK - the second thread was put up by Harti.  I assumed that to counter the first - need my name in the second.  I recommended that it include my name.  It was not intended to promote myself.  THEN.  The third thread 'Bash Rosemary Ainslie here' - was intended as somewhere for Glen et al to post their crap - because my own thread was being systematically wrecked.  And I did not want to lose its readership - which was happening fast.  Then the fourth thread was started by Glen et al.  That thread had a burgeoning readership for precisely one day and all interest then died.  Since they couldn't manage to whip up the required interest on their own thread they then flamed mine precisely when I could do nothing about it as I was ill in hospital.  My son, B4free and Wilby tried to 'stop the rot' during my absense.  But it didn't work.  They're objects were managed.  Very capabably.

So.  I have never technically started any threads here at all.  And I do not know where I got the authority to monitor 2 of them.  In fact I never realised that I had this authority.  My own was required to stop the flaming - which I should have done.  As it was I allowed way too much freedom of expression.  The irony is that their complaint to Harti is that I deleted their posts.  LOL

Regarding the 'editing of comments' - I have deleted less than 0.2% of all that has been lodged against me.  Let me recap.  I deleted a post that had an x rated link.  I deleted a post from Shruggedatlas by accident.  I deleted 2 - I think it was - of Truthbeknowns' posts as they were faithfully being copied on another thread by herself.  Glen wrote to Harti to advise him that I had deleted 8 of his posts.  SIMPLY NOT TRUE.  It's in the same vein as saying - I 'slander' him or that I've perjured myself.  All allegations.  Not  shred of truth.  And those tedious links that he supplies as some kind of endorsement of his allegations?  They very seldom have any relevance at all.

And regarding the FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE TECHNOLOGY.  I cannot do more than my best.  I have FULLY DISCLOSED ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING THAT I CAN TO THE VERY BEST OF MY ABILITY.  It is the effeciency of this anti Anslie campaign that leaves you with the impression that anything is being held back.  My God.  They're good at what they do.

What I freely admit is that I have had second thoughts about SHARING the work that the students are doing.  This because it is their own work and I am truly afraid that Glen or Harvey will copy this work and claim it as their own.  I have that on record where this seems to be their intention.The students themselves will require that recognition.  It's now their project.  But while I may not disclose the test parameters I have EVERY INTENTION of showing those COP results.  And photographing or filming it as required.  And I assure you that NONE OF THAT WORK IS PATENTABLE.  It is just seminal research.

And had I been allowed to simply buckle down and share - as is my wont - then trust me, you'd be struggling for air.  They have, indeed, managed to prevent me sharing both by forcing me to fight my corner and by taking up huge chapters of my time.

Rosemary

I put all the pages of the closed thread are now here;
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Overunity.com%20-%20Forum%20members/rosemarie-ainslie/

Someone can always rework the pages into a pdf file.

@stefan

As for deleting @RA's thread, @stefan please reconsider because the impact will be great. If you do that, then I and many others will never post a discovery on this forum because we could not trust you anymore. I could be Rosemary, like any other member here could be, and, none of us would want that kind of treatment. Any Joe Blow can come here and start massacring a thread then it results in the thread being deleted. Members will always have to be on guard, never knowing if the thread will be there from one week to the next. That's not a good way to run a forum. Besides, the thread will fall into its archival purpose like all other threads eventually do. So what's the big deal to delete it?. Just leave it closed but leave it there.

Then I suggest you ban @fuzzytomcat for having caused so much hassle. The guy has some lose parts in his brains and he has dishonored the OU community with his lower then low tactics. I am just totally insulted by his actions against Rosemary. Just get rid of him fast.