GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Plug Heater

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83031
  • *Latest: Raypinot

  • *Total Posts: 503169
  • *Total Topics: 15039
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 25
  • *Total: 28

Author Topic: off OU topic distractions  (Read 28492 times)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #30 on: November 13, 2010, 06:05:14 AM »
sorry rosemary, i was not intentionally ignoring you. i replied to some posts and then had to leave. i'm not quite sure where this posted copy of the thread is that you want my assistance with. i checked my pm's and my email and did not find any correspondence from you.

Thank God.  And THANK YOU WILBY.

I'll PM YOU. 

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #30 on: November 13, 2010, 06:05:14 AM »

Offline DeepCut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #31 on: November 13, 2010, 01:16:10 PM »
Rosemary i'll keep a copy for you. I'm not sure what the history is here but if all you want to do is make sure that there are multiple copies of your thread in existence then count me in. I've seen a lot of praise for your work so it must be worth keeping.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #32 on: November 13, 2010, 02:10:01 PM »
Rosemary i'll keep a copy for you. I'm not sure what the history is here but if all you want to do is make sure that there are multiple copies of your thread in existence then count me in. I've seen a lot of praise for your work so it must be worth keeping.

Hi DeepCut.  I'm not sure how long this window of opportunity is going to be available to me.  I'm reasonably certain that I'll get banned here - within the foreseeable furture.  Certainly it's going to be near impossible to refer to those results that have been obtained - first to prove the thesis - which experiments were validated by many reputable labs - and then the replication - that Glen and Harvey et al are all trying to hide.  Apparently also with the active co-operation and assistance of Stefan.  Surprising when you think that this is probably the ONLY time that those energy barriers have been breached with absolute due and proper record and measurement.

What I'm hoping to get done is the duplication of the thread onto whatever forum - frankly in whatever way possible - and then LOCK that thread - or that forum.  If that can be done?  The more that are posted the better.  If you have friends who could do the same - then please get them to do it.  If we get a mushrooming evidence of that thread that Harti's going to delete - then we've got a chance of keeping that information alive and in the public eye.  And then, too I think that the public will begin to realise how URGENTLY do these horrors - these SUPPRESSORS OF THE TRUTH try to HIDE this good news.   

We've got results due from campus that will absolutely drown out opposition - but I very much doubt that we can risk putting it on the INTERNET first off.  I've learned a very hard lesson.  I think the best way to go is straight to the press.

So.  In whatever way you can help - it'll be a good thing.  I've started a blog.  Here's the link. 

http://newlightondarkenergy.blogspot.com/

Not much on it yet.  But maybe you could try and alert people to its existence.  It'll hopefully be an overview of the thesis and I intend posting our own Quantum paper and the Open source collaboration that turned into the farce that Glen and Harvey orchestrated.  Anyway.  Try and spread the word - wherever you can manage - and obviously only if you have the time.  The work is definitely NOT my work.  It absolutely belongs to us all.  NO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS WHATSOEVER.  And it needs to stay that way.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #32 on: November 13, 2010, 02:10:01 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #33 on: November 14, 2010, 12:31:10 AM »
If you're gonna accuse the owner of the forum of collusion, I agree you're going to get banned Rosemary. He's deleting all of their stuff too, you know.

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #34 on: November 14, 2010, 12:45:45 AM »
Howdy reading Members and Guests,

Does anyone know the meaning of the word "perjury" ??   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury
Quote

Perjury, also known as forswearing, is the willful act of swearing a false oath or affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to a judicial proceeding.[1] That is, the witness falsely promises to tell the truth about matters which affect the outcome of the case.

The rules for perjury also apply when a person has made a statement under penalty of perjury, even if the person has not been sworn or affirmed as a witness before an appropriate official.



What we have here is a "SWORN" legal affidavit to Scribd from "Rosemary Ainslie" on a Copyright dispute of a document ( Scribd )  doc/26240411

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Legal%20-%20Notes/Scribd/Ainslie^_Affidavit^_Scribd.pdf   (verifiable)


We have a Tektronix e-mail about the equipment used in the "Open Source" testing and evaluation events -

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Legal%20-%20Notes/Tektronix/Request^_for^_return^_due^_to^_misleading^_intent.pdf   (verifiable)


We have documents (doc/26240411) taken down by IEEE on Scribd with the note displayed "This content was removed at the request of IEEE" up loaded by aetherevarising  ( aka Rosemary Ainslie )

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/100130-071433-GLEN-01-Final-Draft

***************************************************************************************************
 


What IEEE does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business with Scribd.

What Tektronix does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business with Scribd.

What Scribd does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business.

But being my name is on the  "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie it's my business also with the unfounded unproven allegations and possible slander ....... and I do know what the meaning of "perjury" is .....
 


Regards,
Glen





Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #34 on: November 14, 2010, 12:45:45 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline DeepCut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 640
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #35 on: November 14, 2010, 01:44:28 AM »
It's only perjury if presented in a court of law.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #36 on: November 14, 2010, 01:45:45 AM »
If you're gonna accuse the owner of the forum of collusion, I agree you're going to get banned Rosemary. He's deleting all of their stuff too, you know.

Happy you're right and I suspect that I'm out of line.  For that I apologise.  But I CANNOT understand why that thread needs DELETING.

I just cannot get there.  LOCK it.  Don't DELETE it.  Do you realise that I made public domain disclosures on our magnets that will now be lost?  Quite apart from the work itself?  And the thesis?  And my readership was NOT small.  On the contrary.

Anyway.
Rosemary

added BTW  -  What work of their's is he deleting?  By their work I presume you mean Glen's work and Glen has NEVER posted his work here.  He's posted links that - on the old thread related to deleted files - and on my thread work that relates to denial of the technology.  Nothing suits them better than to remove all reference.  Golly.  I thought you at least understood that much.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #36 on: November 14, 2010, 01:45:45 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #37 on: November 14, 2010, 02:03:39 AM »
Howdy reading Members and Guests,

Does anyone know the meaning of the word "perjury" ??   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perjury

What we have here is a "SWORN" legal affidavit to Scribd from "Rosemary Ainslie" on a Copyright dispute of a document ( Scribd )  doc/26240411

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Legal%20-%20Notes/Scribd/Ainslie^_Affidavit^_Scribd.pdf   (verifiable)


We have a Tektronix e-mail about the equipment used in the "Open Source" testing and evaluation events -

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater/Legal%20-%20Notes/Tektronix/Request^_for^_return^_due^_to^_misleading^_intent.pdf   (verifiable)


We have documents (doc/26240411) taken down by IEEE on Scribd with the note displayed "This content was removed at the request of IEEE" up loaded by aetherevarising  ( aka Rosemary Ainslie )

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/100130-071433-GLEN-01-Final-Draft

***************************************************************************************************
 


What IEEE does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business with Scribd.

What Tektronix does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business with Scribd.

What Scribd does with the "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie is their business.

But being my name is on the  "SWORN" legal affidavit of Rosemary Ainslie it's my business also with the unfounded unproven allegations and possible slander ....... and I do know what the meaning of "perjury" is .....
 


Regards,
Glen


More to the point - do you understand the meaning of the word DEFAMATION?  I am absolutely NOT GUILTY OF PERJURY.  To be guilty you will need to prove that I am precluded from publishing the submitted paper to the TIE - IEEE.   Perjury would require that I CLAIMED THAT IT WAS PUBLISHED.  I go to some considerable efforts both publicly here and in an explanation of the publication on SCRIBD to assure EVERYONE THAT THE PAPER HAS NOT BEEN PUBLISHED.  I rely on this.  It gives the cause enormous POLITICAL CAPITAL.  HOWEVER.  Now that Scribd have removed the paper PENDING AN INVESTIGATION - and as HARTI is about to remove my thread - there will be ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE OF THIS.  Again.  To those of you who care enough.  Please make copies of that thread that is about to be deleted.

@Glen.  You need to remind us all how you stated on my thread - that thread that is about to be deleted - that 'everyone knows that you have sole copyright'.  There are seven authors.  ANY ONE OF THOSE SEVEN AUTHORS ARE LEGALLY ENTITLED TO PUBLISH THAT PAPER ANYWHERE THEY DEEM FIT. IN THE EVEN THAT THEY RECEIVE ROYALTIES FOR THIS THEN THAT MUST BE SHARED BETWEEN ALL THE COLLABORATORS.  You do NOT have sole copyright.  And if you try and register sole copyright then you will have PERJURED YOURSELF.  That is the meaning of perjury GLEN and I strongly propose you get familiar with the term.

Also.  You PERJURED YOURSELF previously when you wrote to Scribd to advise them that you REPRESENTED THE SOLE COPYRIGHT OWNER.  Then too they withdrew the paper - PENDING AND INVESTIGATION.  And may I remind both you and all the readers here that the result of that investigation was the RE-INSTATEMENT OF THAT PAPER.  I am ENTIRELY SATISFIED that this will be done again.  I have NOT INFRINGED ANYONE'S COPYRIGHT NOR WRONGFULLY MISREPRESENTED THE STATUS OF THE PAPER.  ON THE CONTRARY.

And I believe I either have you or Harvey or both of you to thank for this latest intervention - ALL DONE in a desperate attempt to lose me any voice at all.

Rosemary



Edited spelling

Offline happyfunball

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 405
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #38 on: November 14, 2010, 02:07:33 AM »
Happy you're right and I suspect that I'm out of line.  For that I apologise.  But I CANNOT understand why that thread needs DELETING.

I just cannot get there.  LOCK it.  Don't DELETE it.  Do you realise that I made public domain disclosures on our magnets that will now be lost?  Quite apart from the work itself?  And the thesis?  And my readership was NOT small.  On the contrary.

Anyway.
Rosemary

added BTW  -  What work of their's is he deleting?  By their work I presume you mean Glen's work and Glen has NEVER posted his work here.  He's posted links that - on the old thread related to deleted files - and on my thread work that relates to denial of the technology.  Nothing suits them better than to remove all reference.  Golly.  I thought you at least understood that much.

He's deleting their endless flaming. My personal advice is, ignore them, no one cares what they post except themselves. They've convinced no one of anything and you've defended yourself enough. 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #38 on: November 14, 2010, 02:07:33 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #39 on: November 14, 2010, 02:13:54 AM »
He's deleting their endless flaming. My personal advice is, ignore them, no one cares what they post except themselves. They've convinced no one of anything and you've defended yourself enough.

I wish that this was true.  He's actually deleting something in the order of 3 if not 4 entire threads.  And the one of them has work that was intended for public domain disclosure - as is all my work.  And if you look at the word count involved - it's the size of one or two good sized tomes.  Now to be relegated to a tomb stone.  More's the pity.

Rosemary

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #40 on: November 14, 2010, 02:27:53 AM »
ANOTHER OPEN LETTER TO HARTIBERLIN

PLEASE DO NOT DELETE MY OWN THREAD.  JUST LOCK IT.  ELSE WE WILL ALL LOSE ACCESS TO INFORMATION ON THAT THREAD THAT WAS INTENDED TO BE PUT INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN - IN GOOD FAITH - AND FOR PERMANENT RECORD.  THIS RELATES NOT ONLY TO THE WORK ON THE THESIS - BUT TO THE APPLICATION OF THAT WORK ON THE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF A MAGNETIC MONOPOLE.  ELSE THERE WILL BE NO DUE AND PROPER RECORD.  AND THAT WORK WILL BE LOST WHICH WILL ENABLE THE OUTRIGHT THEFT OF THAT TECHNOLOGY AND THAT THESIS.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #40 on: November 14, 2010, 02:27:53 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Mk1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2069
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #41 on: November 14, 2010, 02:38:11 AM »
@rosemary

Hi , good luck ...

I would like to say that your tread if deleted will be because of the behavior of the people in it more then the content , this is you invention , the responsible thing is to save all your info your self .

You are not banned , and could re post your info .

Some times we are responsible for our success , i have seen tread titles of your that were invitation for overflow of criticism , think 20 time before editing any comment , it always cast doubt about real intent because something is missing , and because someone got cut off , it is a NO NO.

You want people to work with you , you need to disclose everything down to wire gauge , part number , trade secret ,everything , otherwise you are not at the right place , plus it only leads to more problems people can't replicate doubt sets in not good , plus its a question of respect , i see that you spend time arguing , that time should be spent on explaining and showing .

Frankly , i never even bothered looking into your tread because there too much thing surrounding it .

It you really do this for the benefit of everyone then you don't need your name associated with it , knowing you made a difference is enough , Using your full name for user id , show some search of recognition that smells like a Ego , people do like that...

Those are my suggestion , good luck ...

Mark     


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #42 on: November 14, 2010, 03:06:56 AM »
@rosemary

Hi , good luck ...

I would like to say that your tread if deleted will be because of the behavior of the people in it more then the content , this is you invention , the responsible thing is to save all your info your self .

You are not banned , and could re post your info .

Some times we are responsible for our success , i have seen tread titles of your that were invitation for overflow of criticism , think 20 time before editing any comment , it always cast doubt about real intent because something is missing , and because someone got cut off , it is a NO NO.

You want people to work with you , you need to disclose everything down to wire gauge , part number , trade secret ,everything , otherwise you are not at the right place , plus it only leads to more problems people can't replicate doubt sets in not good , plus its a question of respect , i see that you spend time arguing , that time should be spent on explaining and showing .

Frankly , i never even bothered looking into your tread because there too much thing surrounding it .

It you really do this for the benefit of everyone then you don't need your name associated with it , knowing you made a difference is enough , Using your full name for user id , show some search of recognition that smells like a Ego , people do like that...

Those are my suggestion , good luck ...

Mark     

Mark, Thank you for your honesty.  I realise you share this opinion with many others.  I have a very strong readership here - but it is certainly NOT amongst its members or, in any event, its more active members. 

Regarding the naming of the threads.  I have absolutely NEVER started a thread here at OU.com.  I would not know how to.  I do not have the internet skills.  You will notice that the first thread was started by TK - the second thread was put up by Harti.  I assumed that to counter the first - need my name in the second.  I recommended that it include my name.  It was not intended to promote myself.  THEN.  The third thread 'Bash Rosemary Ainslie here' - was intended as somewhere for Glen et al to post their crap - because my own thread was being systematically wrecked.  And I did not want to lose its readership - which was happening fast.  Then the fourth thread was started by Glen et al.  That thread had a burgeoning readership for precisely one day and all interest then died.  Since they couldn't manage to whip up the required interest on their own thread they then flamed mine precisely when I could do nothing about it as I was ill in hospital.  My son, B4free and Wilby tried to 'stop the rot' during my absense.  But it didn't work.  They're objects were managed.  Very capabably.

So.  I have never technically started any threads here at all.  And I do not know where I got the authority to monitor 2 of them.  In fact I never realised that I had this authority.  My own was required to stop the flaming - which I should have done.  As it was I allowed way too much freedom of expression.  The irony is that their complaint to Harti is that I deleted their posts.  LOL

Regarding the 'editing of comments' - I have deleted less than 0.2% of all that has been lodged against me.  Let me recap.  I deleted a post that had an x rated link.  I deleted a post from Shruggedatlas by accident.  I deleted 2 - I think it was - of Truthbeknowns' posts as they were faithfully being copied on another thread by herself.  Glen wrote to Harti to advise him that I had deleted 8 of his posts.  SIMPLY NOT TRUE.  It's in the same vein as saying - I 'slander' him or that I've perjured myself.  All allegations.  Not  shred of truth.  And those tedious links that he supplies as some kind of endorsement of his allegations?  They very seldom have any relevance at all.

And regarding the FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE TECHNOLOGY.  I cannot do more than my best.  I have FULLY DISCLOSED ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING THAT I CAN TO THE VERY BEST OF MY ABILITY.  It is the effeciency of this anti Anslie campaign that leaves you with the impression that anything is being held back.  My God.  They're good at what they do.

What I freely admit is that I have had second thoughts about SHARING the work that the students are doing.  This because it is their own work and I am truly afraid that Glen or Harvey will copy this work and claim it as their own.  I have that on record where this seems to be their intention.The students themselves will require that recognition.  It's now their project.  But while I may not disclose the test parameters I have EVERY INTENTION of showing those COP results.  And photographing or filming it as required.  And I assure you that NONE OF THAT WORK IS PATENTABLE.  It is just seminal research.

And had I been allowed to simply buckle down and share - as is my wont - then trust me, you'd be struggling for air.  They have, indeed, managed to prevent me sharing both by forcing me to fight my corner and by taking up huge chapters of my time.

Rosemary

Offline Mk1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2069
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #43 on: November 14, 2010, 03:26:48 AM »
@rosemary

Ok to save text , you high light the text with the mouse holding the left click , once it is highlighted , right click and select the copy option .

You will need to save info some where , you can use notepad or word , just go to edit in the software and click paste .

To save picture , right click select save picture , you may want to create a folder for it .


Starting a tread is as easy as making a post , you got to be in power but never delete or get in extensive argument , it just drains energy for no good reason .

Offline wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2627
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: off OU topic distractions
« Reply #44 on: November 14, 2010, 03:28:31 AM »
I put all the pages of the closed thread are now here;
http://purco.qc.ca/ftp/Overunity.com%20-%20Forum%20members/rosemarie-ainslie/

Someone can always rework the pages into a pdf file.

@stefan

As for deleting @RA's thread, @stefan please reconsider because the impact will be great. If you do that, then I and many others will never post a discovery on this forum because we could not trust you anymore. I could be Rosemary, like any other member here could be, and, none of us would want that kind of treatment. Any Joe Blow can come here and start massacring a thread then it results in the thread being deleted. Members will always have to be on guard, never knowing if the thread will be there from one week to the next. That's not a good way to run a forum. Besides, the thread will fall into its archival purpose like all other threads eventually do. So what's the big deal to delete it?. Just leave it closed but leave it there.

Then I suggest you ban @fuzzytomcat for having caused so much hassle. The guy has some lose parts in his brains and he has dishonored the OU community with his lower then low tactics. I am just totally insulted by his actions against Rosemary. Just get rid of him fast.


 

OneLink