Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Towards Realizing the TPU  (Read 203322 times)

metatorian

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #405 on: June 05, 2009, 06:04:06 PM »
To access above:  enter application #   10/954,767

http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair

and click the tab "Image File Wrapper"

also another view for the patent application:

http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=oH2bAAAAEBAJ

metatorian

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #406 on: June 05, 2009, 06:21:55 PM »
Check the amended Pohlman claim 04-23-2007   CLM :

metatorian

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #407 on: June 05, 2009, 06:51:30 PM »
Most of the 355 page response refers to the work of George Sparling for support:

One of the abstracts of his latest papers is a helpful summary:
Spacetime is spinorial; new dimensions are timelike
Author: George A.J. Sparling
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0610068

Since Pythagoras of Samos and Euclid of Alexandria [1], we have
known how to express the squared distance between entities as
the sum of squares of displacements in perpendicular directions.
Since HermannMinkowski [2] and Albert Einstein [3], the squared
interval between events has acquired a new term which represents
the square of the time displacement and which comes in with a
negative sign. Most higher dimensional theories, whose aim is
to unify the physical interactions of nature, use space-like extra
dimensions (more squares with positive signs) rather than timelike
(more squares with negative signs)[4−8]. But there need be
no contradiction if timelike extra dimensions are used: for example,
in the seminal work of Lisa Randall and Raman Sundrum [8],
consistency can be achieved by replacing their parameters r,^2
and lambda by −r,^2  and −lambda, respectively. Here a new
spinorial theory of physics is developed, built on Einstein’s general
relativity [3] and using the unifying triality concept of Elie Cartan [9,10]:
the triality links space-time with two twistor spaces[9−14]. Unification
entails that space-time acquires two extra dimensions, each of which
must be time-like. The experimental device known as the Large
Hadron Collider, which is just now coming online, is expected to
put the higher-dimensional theories and this prediction in particular
to the test [15,16].

metatorian

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #408 on: June 05, 2009, 10:56:40 PM »
Citation for above article: Sparling, George A. J. “Germ of a synthesis: space-time is spinorial, extra dimensions are time-like.” Proc. R. Soc. A. doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1839.

Story at: http://www.physorg.com/news96027669.html

Mathematician suggests extra dimensions are time-like
April 17th, 2007 By Lisa Zyga

[snip]

“My work can be seen as a strong antidote to the present air of pessimism surrounding modern fundamental physics,” Sparling said. “As is well-known, string theory has been roundly criticized for its lack of predictive power. String theorists have been reduced to an absurd reliance on the anthropic principle, for example. Here I have a clear-cut prediction, which goes against the common wisdom, which gives experimenters a target to go for: first find the extra dimensions, then decide their signature (a very tough homework assignment!). Of course I could be proved wrong, but the effort to decide is surely worthwhile.

“Actually, in the area of philosophy, I am in opposition to string theory,” he said. “It is a top down theory: dream up something that works in some high dimension and then try to finagle some way of reducing to fit in with the lower-dimensional theory. My approach is bottom up: take the existing four-dimensional theory seriously and try to build up from it. This is very tough to do. Hopefully my ideas work. Note that my work only constitutes a possible beginning at a more inclusive theory.”

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #409 on: June 06, 2009, 03:13:59 PM »
Hello all,

maybe its better to think about TPUs and not about such patents.

The TPU is not soooo complicated.

SM said its only the knowledge about how coils are working, interacting...

Then you have Tesla with his coils...

Otto

@Otto

In this puzzle one finds pieces that have the correct color pattern but do not fit. Then there are the pieces that fit but have the wrong colors.

I await your presentation of the working simplicity.

Many things attributed to SM have become true. I am at the point where strange effects can be generated. Some defy explanation by any current rules. Now, these are only good party tricks to confuse people.

This patent only demonstrates the thoughts of a typical, over-the-edge, genius. They have absolutely no creative ability except to translate, explain, validate and combine the work of many others into patterns very few can understand.

I suspect this patent examiner has an above average IQ but the theory described in the patent will never be understood by him.

Also, the theory cannot be completely correct. It suggest the possibility of time travel. In my mind time-viewing may be possible but time travel will never happen. How so? Because of my early mention of experiments using a watch and coils.

So who is correct? Was SM correct in his explanations?

Until I see some viable method of producing extra power I will continue trying pieces from other puzzles.

 The attached pics are sooo unrelated to the TPU - NOT!

pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #410 on: June 07, 2009, 10:31:57 AM »
@wattsup

I read a good portion of the patent you posted the link for, and noticed a severe logical flaw in the thinking of the individual.

Namely he states (possibly correctly) that the individual energy of a quintessence is planks constant h, and is the smallest unit of energy in the system. He then states by formulaic conclusion that E=hn(sub)q representing the energy of the system. No problems yet.

He goes to state that conglomerations of these quintessences represent the representation of matter, which is logical. He states that lattices of these quintessences form space-time, somewhat speculation but yet acceptable logic.

He then ILLOGICALLY states that energy flows through this lattice, demonstrating that energy is not connected to space-time.

This is a serious flaw, as he has previously demonstrated all energy in the system as being accounted for, and in fact composes space-time, and all represented matter and light within the framework of his own theory. In essence, no energy to "flow through the quintessential lattice".

Am I the only one whom saw this?

metatorian

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #411 on: June 07, 2009, 06:48:57 PM »
Hi pauldude000,

I have yet to finish reading most of this, but so far it has some unfortunate typos and elementary mistakes in physical units and conversions. For instance, his n(sub)q is said to be a frequency, then later it is = m(sub)e/m(sub)q and m(sub)q = h/c^2 kg-s which is not just mass; h/c^2 has units of kg-m^3/s^3.  He could clarify his terms more, in this respect it is not so much the problem you present, (he seems to using something more like a metaphor of a vortex in a medium) and when he speaks of energy he may only mean something related.

 It is a puzzle why this was submitted as a patent application rather than a research paper, since he has no model details of a "working" unit.  And despite the errors there is some interesting insight I've not seen elsewhere, a small example is for his approximation of electron-proton mass ratio, where again the units don't match up; but the numerical accuracy is remarkable and perhaps indicates something more than coincidence.

 The conceptual basis is intriguing though the title word "distortion" could describe some of his physics.  Since he has talked about this in his igniteportland proposal maybe he will further refine, correct, and write a research paper.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #412 on: June 08, 2009, 06:46:07 AM »
Hello all,

@BEP

I dont know but its only peoples fault if they cant find a solution for a TPU. They are NOT able to listen!!! This is the main problem.

It seems that a lot of people are only waiting instead of working.
I gave the builders more then they deserve and they are still ignoring me. Just remember, core - no core.

Yes, SM was correct with his explanations.

You mentioned "extra power".
Hmmmm.....

Here my statement: in a TPU you cant find extra power!!!

The only trick is to "hide" the load from the source!!! This is what everybody should understand.

@All

If some clever people wants a discussion about the "core - no core problem" Im here and please, no "PC heroes". And first think what youre wrighting because its not nice to spit on my words because I could be right!

Otto


pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #413 on: June 08, 2009, 08:15:49 AM »
Hi pauldude000,

I have yet to finish reading most of this, but so far it has some unfortunate typos and elementary mistakes in physical units and conversions. For instance, his n(sub)q is said to be a frequency, then later it is = m(sub)e/m(sub)q and m(sub)q = h/c^2 kg-s which is not just mass; h/c^2 has units of kg-m^3/s^3.  He could clarify his terms more, in this respect it is not so much the problem you present, (he seems to using something more like a metaphor of a vortex in a medium) and when he speaks of energy he may only mean something related.

 It is a puzzle why this was submitted as a patent application rather than a research paper, since he has no model details of a "working" unit.  And despite the errors there is some interesting insight I've not seen elsewhere, a small example is for his approximation of electron-proton mass ratio, where again the units don't match up; but the numerical accuracy is remarkable and perhaps indicates something more than coincidence.

 The conceptual basis is intriguing though the title word "distortion" could describe some of his physics.  Since he has talked about this in his igniteportland proposal maybe he will further refine, correct, and write a research paper.

I have quoted your entire post to keep things clear in my mind as I write this. I seriously suspect he is coming from the aspect of a literal and not figurative mass energy relationship. In essence, that E really is equal to E.

n (sub) q would therefor HAVE to be a frequency, since E=hf. It would then have to be true mass/energy relationship as he is using it in reference to mass interchangeably, without constant reference to virtual mass, and would therefor also have an inherent mass frequency as if E=E then hf=mc(super)2. He is then tying all this into his mental framework.

Do not misunderstand, he is trying to do something I have understood for a long time to be true, yet he makes a separation between the energy of the system and total energy. All energy within the system is accounted for,unless the perception of the system itself is what is inadequate, which I personally think is the case here.

It is a terribly common mistake, which leads to fallacious thinking such as open or closed systems. There is no such critter as an open system, except in the minds of men. THE system is closed (there is only one). We merely tend to ponder utilizing entirely too small of scales of reference.

Paul Andrulis



MACEDONIA CD

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #414 on: June 08, 2009, 09:31:03 AM »
heloo  otto  ... moram  na engleski  da  kazem nesto  za da me svi razume  ;) razume

you have raid  tpu is work  whit and whitout core  ;)

this is depend ho frekfency whiil be  generated

BUT I HAVE MY OVN THINGIN BUT NOW IS NOT ONLY THING THAT

I LIKE TO SAY THAT  AND I ALLTIME SAY THAT  HO IS BE HARD TO EXPLANE  AND IS LIKE NO POSIBLE  <TPU IS MAKEING TRUE FASTING VORTEX SPEED BUT THIS YEARS IN FORUM DISCUSING HOW IS POSIBLE TO SPIN ELKTROMAGNET SO HARD TO EXPLANE AND  REALY ANDERSTEND HOW
SOME OF MY ..... IF YOU LIKE TO SPIN ELKTROMAGNET OR PULSING OR ...
THE ELKTROMAGNET FILD  IS ABLE TO SPIN OR MAKES ROTATION  WHIT HIM ITSELF
THERE IS  SOME  ATHERE FORCE HOW GIVES TO SPIN
I SEE THE THE OPEND TPU
AND IF I TELL YOU SOME AMAIZING  STRANGE SETUP
IF I TELL YOU THAT
THE RED BIFILAR 4 COILS IN THE OPEN TPU <IS NOT CONECTED ENYWHERE >

WHAT YOU WHILL THING NOW IM ASKING ALL HERE

IM JUST LIKE TO SEE PEOPLE WHAT IS THINGING FOR THAT
I KNOW SOME OF HERE WHILL SAY  NO  THAT IS STUPID THINGIN BEACOUSE WAY IS THEN NEED THAT WIRES  ;)

NOW I SEE TPU IS LIKE <MAKES SPINING 5000 TIMES JUST IN ONE SECOND  >WHIT VERY LITLE  SMALL ELKTROMAGNET FILD
IMAGNET THE POWER  SOME GENERATOR HO WHILL BE SPIN OF <300000 >SPINIG OF ONE MINUTES


otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #415 on: June 08, 2009, 12:05:24 PM »
Hello all,

OK, MAC says the TPU works with a core and without a core.
He is clever.

Who is the next??

Otto

turbo

  • Guest
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #416 on: June 08, 2009, 05:21:23 PM »
Yes he must be a TUBE Professor....

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #417 on: June 08, 2009, 08:09:40 PM »
Subquantum kinetics - the space between the spaces - 63x faster than the speed of light. Podkletnov.

How fast is that 'B' field spin or go around? You don't need a core.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/toroid.html

Quote
He then ILLOGICALLY states that energy flows through this lattice, demonstrating that energy is not connected to space-time.

This is a serious flaw, as he has previously demonstrated all energy in the system as being accounted for, and in fact composes space-time, and all represented matter and light within the framework of his own theory. In essence, no energy to "flow through the quintessential lattice".
« Last Edit: June 08, 2009, 08:37:07 PM by giantkiller »

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #418 on: June 08, 2009, 10:03:49 PM »
I HAVE A FEW WORDS ...

RODIN COIL ...  AND GET YOUR ROCK ON  ;)

IST!


otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Towards Realizing the TPU
« Reply #419 on: June 09, 2009, 06:50:15 AM »
Hello all,

@Giantkiller says no core.

Who is the next???

Where are the TPU elite members??? HEEEEELLLLLOOOOO

Wake up!!

Otto