@sparks

Regarding the FTPU outer rings (2), now if we supposed that each ring is made of insulated iron wire that is one length turned three times and connected end to end to make a mobius type loop. Now, let's say you have one coil wound all around the loop that we would call the secondary. Then you have one coil wound over just 1/3 of the loop called the primary. 

We already know that in standard laminated core coupling, the flux moves in the laminations relative to the primary polarities then to the secondary and thus creates the transfer.

Now in this case, when the primary hits the insulated iron wire (equal to laminate core), since it is insulated and turning three times back onto itself, does this mean with one pulse on primary, the flux will make three turns inside the secondary wind.

This would be equal to what @grumpy showed in his recent document on toroid windings, having one primary over several toroids transfering to many secondaries. The idea behind having a three ring laminate is that if the primary is well timed to expend the least energy possible (most bang for the buck which can be done very easilly with Tesla Ozone Patent shorting method), there may be a cumulative effect over the secondaries and produce some OU.

I know some will say "there goes wattsup again with his standard thinking", but this would not be so standard if the flux can turn three times inside the secondary winding. We are always trying to push current inside a copper condutor to impart coupling to other copper wires when we already know the best way is to move the flux in a laminate and if this flux can turn and turn many times very fast, I think it should make some interesting results.

In any case, I will make one this week and test it.

Interesting idea.However.... In that case the bigger output from TPU the more iron core turns should be there and TPU should be much higher. I don't see that being a case for TPU according to SM videos. Rather different approximation seems true : more output power means higher TPU diameter.Anyway, very good idea.

    @wattsup

        You can look on this from a radio wave perspective also.   Any radio man knows in his antennae system how to use a standing wave ratio meter.   If you want to get the signal out there you don't want your waves stuck in the coax.   What if we intentionally create a standing wave field in a virtual piece of coax could this standing wave field turn into a rotating standing wave field?

I have a question : if you put two electric currents into primary of transformer what is the result on secondary ? I mean : are they THE SAME CURRENTS just with different voltage whic are coming out of magnetic field of transformer OR COMPLETLY NEW CREATED currents ?

Why is this important ? If they are the same just with different voltage they will not merge no matter how we try, but if they are NEW just with proper parameters corresponding to primary currents , then we have in really new area.


Can someone propose experiment to validate such concept ?

Ride 'em, cowboy! 

Any noise in your power supply is like a bur under your saddle. It might be small but it is fast! Kapeesh?
Don't grab the bull by the ring.

There are 2 types of questions. Those that you can google answers and those that you have to test. Start your own desktop rodeo. Everything from goat ropers to bucking broncos.

The GK4 was heterodyned. 

--giantkiller. OMG.

The answer to my question WILL RESOLVE much of uncertainty about free energy in induction coils (for example in Bedini circuits)

IF currents are new, then THERE IS NOW possibility that EXTERNAL MAGNETIC FIELD when properly applied to magnetic field of inductor WILL SHOW ITSELF in resulting current as ADDED energy.

IF currents are not new, there is no such posssibility.


Sorry for poor English but I'm so exited.

@sparks

You are getting better and better with those Egyptian Hieroglyphic designs. Just joking.

On your previous post, if standing waves can be used, please explain how in the FTPU this could be done with what is already there. My idea of the iron ring is because there is a ring and there is winding in the actual TPU. Explanations and ideas should be as close to the device depiction as possible. A coil, ok, which one, where is located, etc. If you guys can keep this to specific parts of the TPU, then maybe we will understand more.

@forest

Regarding your post one more rings for the larger TPU, I don't know. It seems there is still only 6 total loops when you look at the cutaway photos. The 6 looped ring is simply of greater diameter.

About frequencies, yes, guys have done this on the forum for years. Look up Otto's ECD. In some of my coils I have found that if you pulse one frequency to find the resonance, then apply the second frequency at the same frequency minus 1 hertz and shift it's phasing by at least 6.84 degrees, you get real havoc and more voltage production.

But frequencies will depend on the power type AC square/sine, straight dc or pulsed dc or reverse pulsing dc, all of these will produce different effects.

@otto

Hope you are doing well.

First of all, don't ever be sorry for jumping in otto. We always like what you have to say and teach and reading between the lines. lol

Well,,,,, the FTPU ring could be either iron wire, copper wire or other wire, but to better understand this, unfortunately all types must be tested. The logic behind each wire type must be looked at until we can understand the best methods. Same for the LTPU.

Everything I have on all units, photos, diagrams etc., is now available to everyone on my ftp site which is located here http://www.purco.qc.ca/ftp/.

Just look in the Steven Mark sub directory to find the TPU type and go from there.

Any file with the word "cut" will be off the cutaway video. I kept one of my companies open just for OU stuff because I can then declare all my R&D expenses. Why not.

I wanted to make this ftp site so I could have an easy way of finding things when I am not at home and also to provide others with all the images, etc., in one convenient location and not have to search the Forum, which is getting to be more and more loaded with so many other things. You and Roberto are on there also. If there are things you would like me to remove, let me know. Or add, then send it to me at contactOU@purco.qc.ca. Remove the "OU" from the e-mail I just gave you.

So I am not saying it is iron wire, but "if" it is iron wire, what would be the dynamics.

One main or major thing about the TPUs is the builds are all made with coil winds that are not that precisely spaced. This indicates that they are all relying on a main principle of operation that has enough leeway to accommodate build variations as long as the main principle is adhered to, the device should work.

Another important note about the FTPU center toroid and the LTPU center toroids. They do not seem to have the same winds. On the FTPU the winds seem to be much more with a finer wire and many layers, so the toroid  in the FTPU could provide a point of high induction. In contrast to the LTPU toroids that have a set and clealy vissible limited number of winds that I have already drawn and identified.

Then the question is why would you have more winds in the FTPU and I think it is related to the fact that the FTPU outer winds could never provide the point of high induction because there is simply not enough wire there, whereas in the LTPU SM could be using the outer winds to also provide the high induction point while using the toroids as an output regulator since the LTPU toroids halves are in parallel and there are two of them to handle the higher voltages.

I could go on and on for pages.

Now regarding the FTPU I know now there is a small transistor that has three long thin legs and there are some capacitors (3) one beside the other, then there is the front EM capacitor and there is also another EM capacitor in the back. There is also a 1" long resistor or fuse resistor. 

If anyone is good with circuits, I would need a table of components that someone would require if they wanted to make a transistor oscillate at 5khz, 10khz, 15khz, 20khz, 2mhz, 5mhz, 10mhz and 20mhz. Based on a driving voltage of 3vdc. If anyone can give me the capacitor values required then I could look them up, see how they look in reality and compare them to what is in the FTPU. So you see, I have been trying to keep a certain level of methodology but my EE to do such a table is not good enough.

I know alot more today on the FTPU wiring and will make a new wiring diagram when time permits. But for now it is really looking, making and testing many variations. What else is possible to do in such circumstances? Those who are on this know of the many variables.

I also sent an e-mail to Jack Durban asking if he found his BETA video but have not received an answer from him. Booo hooo. That would have been great to have a better video copy.