Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Electrinium  (Read 244688 times)

Dr. Tesla

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #300 on: October 18, 2008, 05:50:05 AM »
I mean, have you experimenters actually noticed that all this "electrinium" biznis is simply about re-conditioning the sludge to re-charge it again?

And what the rat's hat is new about that? In fact, why are you even bothering opening an alkaline battery and playing with the chemicals (which could harm you as well and almost all of enthusiasts here admit not being educated even in basics of sciences needed for such games advocated here. I mean cyanide...come the flack on. Like it is a simple affair to get it, let alone protect yourselves against it...)

Just re-charge the darn thing. Alkaline batteries can be recharged several times over. And if you use a weekender solar panel for that, after a couple of years it will be for FREE ( the recharged energy).

Safely, simply and quick. No messing around with apples to get the cyanide (hell, I cannot stop pissing into my pants on that one!!!!! ), collecting the sludge into cans, growing tomatoes and crystals (hydroponically I gather) and so on.

And after all these great tips, I can still see some sob giving me hard time for "being negative or personal".

One just can't make happy everyone I guess...

nitinnun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #301 on: October 18, 2008, 07:33:24 AM »
.......the irons atoms magnetic field,
is conducted through the "covalent bond chain" of the polymer/glue.

the iron atoms magnetic field, then "interacts" with the copper atoms diamagnetic field?


how does the "electron magnetic field" of the iron atom,
interact with the "diamagnetic field" of the copper atom??????????


kosol ouch said something about this.

but i think he used a powerful magnetic field from a sinoid coil,
to interact with bismuths strong diamagnetic field?


bismuth works much better than copper.

nitinnun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #302 on: October 18, 2008, 07:52:44 AM »
......the copper atom has more "etheric pressure", than the iron atom?


so the coppers higher ether pressure, is conducted through the polymer/glues covalent bonds, into the iron atom?


is the coppers diamagnetism, and the irons ferromagnetism, related to etheric pressure????

mrcharisma

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 32
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #303 on: October 18, 2008, 08:56:31 AM »
And what are you refering at? Can you be more speciffic?

Kiddo, make sure you get me on something real. I am happy to take the flack for my errors. No one is perfect. At least, if I say something stupid, 'llI admit it. Those "working" on a battery reconditioning process here (and call it so esoterically electrinium...how passe'...) would never do that.

'Coz in essence this whole electrinium thing is about re-conditioning the sludge to hold the charge again. In case you and them haven't noticed. And that has already been discovered and studied by scientists long time ago.




Dr Tesla!

What you are saying can be easily done (recond. the sludge to hold charge again) by replacing the electrolyte and putting the batteries back on a charger...

NO, the whole electrinium "thing" is about realinging the bonded pairs of atoms in the sludge in series so that the voltage stacks up to produce a continuous charge, and fixing those pairs with a hard permanent substance to create a permanent battery that never needs charging (once it is aligned) and never discharges.

The energy for this charge is garnered from the electrical eneregy the sun emits constantly.

Which it receives in turn from a larger central sun at the center of our galaxy!

The electrical energy from the central sun acting at "right angles" to the energy of our solar sun interacting with the earth's natural magnetic fields is what we call "gravity". It seems to me that the technological understanding in the PDF surpasses our current understanding of technology which is why some people are struggling to come to terms with it. I know this is true because at present not every household has their own working antigravity model yet. Although without a doubt these things will be not only possible but commonplace in the near future.

I learned at college that to be a good student was not to "reproduce" the things I was being taught but to keep an open mind so that learning could be facilitated easily. A closed mind just limits one to the current set of "facts" being presented to it. Of course these facts are not really facts they are just what we have been led to believe is the truth.



If truth is your goal then at least we are on the same team specifically eh kiddo ;)



Matt


mrcharisma

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 32
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #304 on: October 18, 2008, 08:59:44 AM »
I mean, have you experimenters actually noticed that all this "electrinium" biznis is simply about re-conditioning the sludge to re-charge it again?

And what the rat's hat is new about that? In fact, why are you even bothering opening an alkaline battery and playing with the chemicals (which could harm you as well and almost all of enthusiasts here admit not being educated even in basics of sciences needed for such games advocated here. I mean cyanide...come the flack on. Like it is a simple affair to get it, let alone protect yourselves against it...)

Just re-charge the darn thing. Alkaline batteries can be recharged several times over. And if you use a weekender solar panel for that, after a couple of years it will be for FREE ( the recharged energy).

Safely, simply and quick. No messing around with apples to get the cyanide (hell, I cannot stop pissing into my pants on that one!!!!! ), collecting the sludge into cans, growing tomatoes and crystals (hydroponically I gather) and so on.

And after all these great tips, I can still see some sob giving me hard time for "being negative or personal".

One just can't make happy everyone I guess...


...because it is fun to learn new things I guess LOL



Matt :)

mrcharisma

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 32
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #305 on: October 18, 2008, 09:02:44 AM »
the zero point energy molecule !


copper atom collects/stores positive charge.

iron atom collects/stores negative charge.

polymer MAGNETICALLY connects copper and iron.
but ELECTRICALLY disconnects them.
so that coper/iron may charge up, but not short each other out.


two ZPE molecules connected in parallel, increases amperage.
two ZPE molecules connected in series, increases voltage.


if you place a stick of copper,
and a stick of steel,
into a cup of elmers school glue,
than EVERY ATOM on the surface of the copper/steel, counts as a ZPE molecule!


but since the above ZPE molecules are connected in PARALLEL, only amperage stacks!
while voltage stays the same.

that is why i get mroe amperage, for more metal surface area. yet nothing, for more metal mass.



what someone NEEDS to do, is make a crystal lattice.
where each molecule in the crystal lattice, has 1 copper, one iron, held apart by a third atom.
(carbon or silicon?)


to melt glass, ancient people just built a brick/stone oven, and fed fule into it.
the heat built up inside the oven, just like electricity builds up in a capacitor.

until there was enough stored heat in the oven, to melt silicon dioxide into glass.



Dear nitinnun,


I love your work and your theories on the copper iron battery. Maybe you are on your way to producing an simplified elemental rod generator? One rod charging positively and the other negatively to produce a natural potential difference...


Matt

mrcharisma

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 32
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #306 on: October 18, 2008, 09:13:09 AM »
I mean, have you experimenters actually noticed that all this "electrinium" biznis is simply about re-conditioning the sludge to re-charge it again?

Just re-charge the darn thing. Alkaline batteries can be recharged several times over. And if you use a weekender solar panel for that, after a couple of years it will be for FREE ( the recharged energy).



Dr.T, how does one go about recharging a crystal?

http://www.vakuumenergie.de/energy/english/crystagg/index.htm



Matt

mrcharisma

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 32
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #307 on: October 18, 2008, 09:21:00 AM »


And after all these great tips, I can still see some sob giving me hard time for "being negative or personal".

One just can't make happy everyone I guess...


ha ha that's life! what you give is what you get....

at least you are erring on the safe side, lol

(just my little joke)



Matt

Dr. Tesla

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #308 on: October 18, 2008, 03:13:38 PM »
mrcharisma,

If you align the atoms to hold the charge, you end up with superconductor. Sludge cannot serve that purpose because you have already taken the charge (free electrons) out of it and forced the molecules to bond with molecules of other material into a new chemical material. Sludge is inert electrically.

And no cental sun in a galaxy far far away, or around the corner, can change that.

Think of an acid and a caustic liquids. Both "charged" with strong abrasive/ dilluting characteristic, but if you mix them together, they cancel each other out and combine into an inert, harmless compound.

Sludge doesn't have any free electrons to move around and as such cannot produce electricity. Electricity is a flow of free electrons, not of aligned atoms and/or molecules. You can only get those back from your sludge if you re-condition it. If you turn it back into the original state - separate the two chemicals used to produce the flow of free electrons and return them into their pre-charge state in order to combine them again in the battery to produce electricity.

If you make electrinium work, or think you can, show us the chemical reaction formula for that proces. If it is possible, it can be expressed as a chemical reaction. And none of methods in the pdf make any sense from that point of view. Cyanide won't create surplus of electrons in sludge. Growing cristals either.

Just as adding water or beer won't separate caustic and acidic liquids.

I do not remember seeing any of these in the pdf file. Surely there will be a good reason for that.

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #309 on: October 18, 2008, 03:59:21 PM »
Hi!

This thread has become very interesting now that we have a good quorum.

Thank you nitinnun for joining us!

I have a question for mrcharisma. Are you a relative of mattblythe?

Thank you all for being trying to solve the elctrinium mistery.

Jesus

Drannom

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 250
    • Cristallerie La Pyramide d'Alun
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #310 on: October 18, 2008, 04:05:06 PM »
Quote
If you align the atoms to hold the charge, you end up with superconductor

align and COMPRESS

Quote
Cyanide won't create surplus of electrons in sludge. Growing cristals either.


NaCN is only to get the first compound of iron-silver

Dr. Tesla please reread the electrinium, obviously you have not get it

from electrinium

Quote
The rule of electrical balance is so important that I am going to repeat It. “The electrical
charge of the atom is equal to its weight multiplied by its volume.” Study this law because what
you read further on will not be understandable otherwise.

Quote
The only difference between the positive and the nega t ive is in size, weight and their electrical charge, and the electrical charge of these two atoms is equal to each other in force under the law of electrical balance and their position as positive and negative is relative. If the two chosen atoms were Silver and Iron, the Iron atom would be the negative. But if Iron was paired up with a much lighter element, then the Iron would be the positive.



Quote
Let us make a small model Unit. Let us use time-tested elements and processes already in use
today. Let us select Silver and Iron for our Electrinium Compound. Iron and Silver are being used
in many of the new and improved batteries of the world. Silver will be the positive element and
Iron the negative. If we could find a worn out Silver-Iron battery there would be enough Silver-
Iron compound in its bottom to make many Electrinium Units.


this topic is for those one believing that superlight can be tune in 2 atoms compressed and aligned with high voltage, and maintain like this with cristallized process, skeptics are welcome to receive the quotations i will provide to them from the electrinium



hey Jesus, magnets will not help doing electrinium unit, it is the high voltage

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #311 on: October 18, 2008, 04:14:15 PM »
Hi!

@drannom
Thanks.  Did you see the work of nitinnun?
He says that a crystal lattice is needed. Do you know how to make that?

Jesus

Drannom

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 250
    • Cristallerie La Pyramide d'Alun
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #312 on: October 18, 2008, 04:46:09 PM »
Yes i appreciate very much whatever Nitinnu said

there is many inventions to study, crystal Reid, elemental rods, glue cell, and pyramid power, all of this seems to be a way to catch some superlight

for the skeptics, how to believe in super light

begin with this and and answer your questions then

 http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/11/milewski_describes_magnetoelec.html

Skeptics are welcome, except for those who have not reread electrinium, and except for trolls, agents of disinformation, and all other name we call them, they work to keep humanity enslaved, the NWO kill inventors, Illuminatis and hybrid-reptilians are among us, most of them are human, claim to know everething and fake to know nothing, they will replace any inventor or mind-controled them

so, the first step is to create a silver-iron battery in the way to collect iron-silver compound, and then play with it

Jesus ! i will focus only on electrinium

and many posts are just, out of topic, even if there is a correlation with electrinium

i will strat a new topic, probably, only to focus on the iron-silver battery and get the silver-iron compound

or i will move back to the steel(carbon-iron)- (gold or platinum) compound, cause in this case the compound is also the body of the electrinium unit


the first step is to create silver-iron battery

and reread electrinium, and reread electrinium, and reread electrinium, and reread electrinium,

if you not, you will look like an idiot, still talking about everything but not about electrinium

i will not get NaCN soon, i will not get an old silver-iron battery as well

so i will take 2 rods, one silver and the other of iron, and shoot a lot of great sparks through them, and try to align some iron-silver molecule

the Reid crystal proove that we are on a good path, the Reid crystal is not enough powerfull as an electrinium will be

so i focus on the electrinium






nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #313 on: October 18, 2008, 10:28:11 PM »
Hi!

@drannom
Among other things SuperLight is the prime activating energy in the universe.

I did not know that it was called Superlight.

Jesus

nitinnun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 713
Re: Electrinium
« Reply #314 on: October 18, 2008, 11:50:59 PM »
my biggest scientific asset, is not my logic.
it is not my linear thinking ability.
i am too right brain dominant, to be good at those two things.


my biggest scientific asset, is my intuitition.
my ability to think in non-linear.
my ability to understand the general picture.
my ability to make connections between 2 important pieces of information.


the things that i type, are sometimes from my personal research/experience.
but most of the time, are from a "feeling" that i get.
a feeling that it is somehow very "important".

what i say is "likely" to be correct on the general, and incorrect on the specifics.
in my experience, the general is usually what inventors have the most trouble solving.



if "you" can recognize the true things in what i say, than you might just have the information that you need, to solve that unsolvable problem that is in your way.
and complete your invention.