Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: 911 , a short clip  (Read 51109 times)

HEYDUDE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #15 on: August 28, 2008, 09:21:16 PM »
Madsen, sorry, wasn't aimed at you personally , I was speaking rhetorically. I just now corrected the post to read that way.

Quote
Eh?  Bush is one of the worst presidents we've ever had, IMO.  He got into office without my help.  I just don't think he had a hand in deliberately orchestrating 9/11.

Whoever was behind 911 didn't care about Bush. He was puzzled and probably not in on it. And when the second plane hit, he was not whisked away by the Secret Service as often the case when a presidents life is possibly endangered by an attack situation  but left in bewilderment in that schoolhouse for 15 or so more minutes, even though his whereabouts were widely publicized beforehand and he would have been an easily locatable target.

Yes it is all very general. As one digs deeper you begin to get a sense that there is far more to the story than meets the eye.

No need to discuss how the buildings came down, whether by terrorist patsies, explosives, secret weapons etc. This is diversion. Better to find out who got Norad to stand down, and who orchestrated the affair.

Who got rich when the military machine finally got cranked up is a better question. Qui Bono

madsen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #16 on: August 28, 2008, 09:25:20 PM »
Sorry, wasn't aimed at you personally , I was speaking rhetorically. I corrected the post to read that way.

Thanks---please ignore my response to that part then.


ffonz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #17 on: August 29, 2008, 12:46:28 PM »
Hmmm... why argue with each other..

Forget the self-induced disunity..

Take the team approach and enjoy the unity..

Try this for a serious dose of reality..

http://www.newswithviews.com/
http://www.newswithviews.com/
http://www.newswithviews.com/


Time for we the people to hear their wake up call..

ffonz   8)
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````
`
`

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #18 on: August 29, 2008, 06:04:53 PM »
Well I performed hundreds of tests over many years [most of the time that they stood]on the concrete and steel at the towers for the port authority of N.Y and N.J [they ran the bldgs] and I have to say it is my opinion that the SAUDIS that flew the plains were expecting to kill 100's of thousands not 3000
 If you watch these vids you might find the connection {from user Batman]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYPjGn-hP8A&feature=related
Besides the FACT that every car Manu in the world has a car right here right now that runs on water [this didn't happen overnight [The big boys whoever they are  Are brawling]
some of these cars, and Techs, August issue, www.designnews.com
 Chet

Eden

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #19 on: August 30, 2008, 10:37:48 AM »
it is inconceivable that the people criticising the truth mouvements
refuse to look at the scientific facts. All here on this forum have somehow
a technical interest.
If they would only look and analyse they would see;
but their objectivity is barred by emotional blockages...
just one message to them:

LOOK AT THE FACTS

HEYDUDE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #20 on: August 30, 2008, 03:12:41 PM »
Approach the 911 story as a mystery story. Consider the following.

1) The blame was cast over the networks nearly simultaneously  before any buildings fell.

2) A multi-billion dollar protection network (our air defense) mysteriously failed, only on that day.

3) Two of the worlds strongest buildings (built to withstand such an event)  vaporised within minutes of each other.

Columbo would be biting off the end of his cigar and asking lots of good questions.

Those who persue the facts, and are willing to do a little detective work,  will be amazed.

Others, however, will drape themselves with a flag, put on their blinders,  and tell you it is unpatriotic to question authority or the governments official "conspiracy theory".

In recent years, the gov. handful has been scurrying to buttress their failing story,
« Last Edit: August 30, 2008, 03:34:41 PM by HEYDUDE »

madsen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #21 on: August 30, 2008, 05:44:58 PM »
Approach the 911 story as a mystery story. Consider the following.

1) The blame was cast over the networks nearly simultaneously  before any buildings fell.

I was watching NBC the morning of 9/11, and there was some speculation after the first plane hit the WTC that it was an accident.  Of course the second plane crashing made it clear it was a deliberate attack.  IIRC, the news anchors were being fairly cautious about placing blame with any particular group, partly because of the fiasco that happened after Oklahoma City no doubt.  Nevertheless, there were some obvious suspects---the group that blew up the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 (al Qaeda), and associates of those that bombed the WTC itself in 1993.  I didn't see anything about the networks' behavior that looked suspicious.

Are you saying here that the news networks were actually working with the 9/11 perpetrators, whoever they were, to create a false version of the events and deceive the public?

Gobaga

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #22 on: August 30, 2008, 06:21:29 PM »
The Tao Te Ching
by Lao Tzu

Translated by Tienzen (Jeh-Tween) Gong
http://www.iewu.edu/Lao1.htm


56
Those who know do not chat.
Those who chat do not know.  
Plug the openings, close the gate.
Temper the sharpness, eliminate the division.
Soften the brightness, be the same as the dust (as lowly as possible).
This is the Primal Union.
Thus, friends, enemies, good, harm, honor and disgrace are all with you.
The world will honor you.

57
Rule a nation with justice.
Wage war with deception.
Become ruler of the world with peace.
How do I know that this is so?
Because of these.
The more laws and restrictions,
the poorer people become.
The sharper men's weapons,
the more trouble in the land.
The more ingenious and clever men,
the more strange things happen.
The more rules and regulations,
the more thieve and robbers.
Therefore, the sage says: I Wu-Wei,
people will rule themselves.
I enjoy peace and people become honest.
I do nothing special (such as tax and war) and people become rich.
I have no unjust desires (concubines, conquering, etc.),
people return to the good and simple life.



58
When the country is ruled with simple rules,
the people are simple.
When the country is ruled with complicated laws,
the people are cunning.
Misery often gives rise to future happiness.
Beneath happiness often lurks misery.
Who knows what the future holds?
Positive could be reversed.
Nothing stays positive forever.
Honesty becomes dishonest.
Goodness could become wicked.
People will be confused for a long time.
Therefore, the sage is righteous but not prejudging,
thrifty but not stingy,
straightforward but not unrestrained,
Brilliant but not blinding.



PYRODIN123321

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 253
    • Pyrodin's Information Anabranch
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #23 on: August 30, 2008, 06:50:26 PM »
WELL, THE MATH SAYS IT WAS NOT FIRE FROM JET FUEL THAT MADE THE BUILDING FALL....NOT HARD TO TELL SOMTHINGS FISHY

WWW.AE911TRUTH.ORG IS A GOOD SITE


HEIGHT OF THE TALLEST BUILDING IS 417 METERS

d=1/2 gt?

417=1/2 *9.81*t?

2(417)/9.81=t?

or t=(squareroot of 85.02)

t=9.22 seconds at freefall

This means if you jumped off the top of the building at 417 meters you would hit the ground in 9.22 seconds minus air resistance.
The building fell its footprint in 10 SECONDS
Comparing the actual 10 SECONDS to the 9.22 sec. the lower floors offered less than
 1 SECOND of resistance for all of them, without counting air resistance or other slowing effects! It is physically impossible for the strongest, heaviest and (3 times working design load) bottom 80+ floors to offer near zero resistance to the falling floors.

IM PRETTY SURE FIRES DONT KNOCK THE FEET OUT FROM A BUILDING IN ONE SECOND

JSHYDROXY

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #24 on: August 30, 2008, 07:11:55 PM »
 CONTROLLED DEMO!!!! EASY TO SEE IF YOU KNOW WHAT TO LOOK FOR AND I KNOW WHAT TO LOOK FOR. BEEN THERE DONE THAT!!

OOH RAHH YOUR GOV. HATES YOU DONT EVER THINK DIFF.

madsen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #25 on: August 30, 2008, 07:19:52 PM »
The building fell its footprint in 10 SECONDS
Comparing the actual 10 SECONDS to the 9.22 sec. the lower floors offered less than
 1 SECOND of resistance for all of them, without counting air resistance or other slowing effects! It is physically impossible for the strongest, heaviest and (3 times working design load) bottom 80+ floors to offer near zero resistance to the falling floors.

IM PRETTY SURE FIRES DONT KNOCK THE FEET OUT FROM A BUILDING IN ONE SECOND

1)  Various sources give numbers ranging from 8--16 seconds for the fall times of the towers. 

2)  If one extra second beyond free fall time is not sufficient, how long would it take for the WTC to collapse?  Do you have any calculations which give the minimum realistic collapse time?  (Assuming it was not imploded of course).

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #26 on: August 30, 2008, 08:01:41 PM »
Welcome to OverUnity.com

The International open source free energy research forum


This is the title of this web site !!  Can't you people read !!

What the FUCK does this subject have to do with OverUnity !! 

Nothing nothing and nothing take your like minded hatered to some other web site that offer rummors, speculation and lies.

I can't believe the Stephan lets this "SHIT' continue !!!!

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #27 on: August 30, 2008, 08:26:40 PM »

I can't believe the Stephan lets this "SHIT' continue !!!!


and he will continue to as long as the check doesn't bounce...


How's the HHO coming along?  Got a car running entirely on HHO yet?

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #28 on: August 30, 2008, 08:41:28 PM »
and he will continue to as long as the check doesn't bounce...


How's the HHO coming along?  Got a car running entirely on HHO yet?

Hey Grumpy,

No problems with the smaller units, It's just going over the 100 LPM boundary the volts - amps thing is a difficult advisory even for a professional.

Fuzzy

HEYDUDE

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: 911 , a short clip
« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2008, 09:37:50 PM »
Feline

1) Learn to spell before posting or use a spell checker.

2) The thread is appropriately titled. There are many threads here that have little to do with actual overunity, yet have a large following.

3) There are plenty of other threads to post that rather annoying cat picture, try them.