Author Topic: BREAKING : ~Imhotep~'s Free Energy Radiant Oscillator Lite (Read 89359 times)

Peterae · « **Reply #120 on:** October 11, 2008, 11:45:29 PM »

Hi Chaps
In the UK you can buy a power factor correction box just plugs into the mains near ther meter.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Power-Electricity-Energy-Saver-Save-5-to-30-UK-Pins_W0QQitemZ330278143356QQcmdZViewItem?hash=item330278143356&_trkparms=72%3A1301|39%3A1|66%3A2|65%3A12|240%3A1318&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14

Peter

sulake · « **Reply #121 on:** October 12, 2008, 01:55:19 AM »

Quote

Generally "volts" is not a technically acceptable measurement for the state of battery charge.

Generally, state of a battery charge is useless when trying to find out, if your circuit is OU or not. Electrical energy is stored in a chemical form and that causes problems. When you charge the battery and then stop charging, the voltage starts to go down for a while. What is the current charge of your battery right now? Are you sure? No you are not!
Using battery will cause huge errors in your energy calculations all the time. You can not ever accurately state how much energy is in your battery. Also, all cheap normal meters give huge errors when you are using pulsed DC or just any other shape of AC than pure sine wave. You can not state how much energy went in to the battery.
Instead of batteries, you can use capacitors. Again, electrolytic capacitors are not the best choice because they attend to develop charge after you have emptied them. Again because of the chemicals.
If you want to measure the energy production of your circuit very accurately, here is what you can do.
And this is very accurate and easy!

Just use two capacitors, another one is the charged power source and the other is the one that you charge. Even easier if the capacitors are identical. Run your circuit for a while and if you end up with more volts than you started, you have OU!
Say, you have 0.5 Farads capacitor charged to 12 Volts. You then run your circuit for a while and shut it down. Then you have 9Volts left in the source and 3Volts charged to the empty one. Congratulations, your circuit is 100% efficient. There is just no chance of error!
If you end up with 9Volts in the source and 9Volts also in the empty one then there just is no possibilities, you have Free Energy! You have 150% efficient circuit. But you can not make a statement like this if you use batteries. The error marginal is just so huge when using batteries that you are just wasting your time.
When you use capacitors as the source and to store the output, all you need is a cheap ass voltage meter and you can have very accurate results.

(http://www.hotlinkfiles.com/files/1940749_ajiul/OUdevice.JPG)

It is very likely, that when one of us makes a circuit that is over unity, the free energy is only a small amount, say, like 5% gain in total energy. This is likely to happen like this, because we donâ€™t yet have a law of free energy, so we will bump into it by accident. And if your system has a 0â€¦50% error factor in it all the time, then you will miss this valuable free energy that you just made.
Greatest invention of a human history, that you made, but missed it just because your experiment was so poorly made.
After you have found a circuit that produces just a little amount of free energy, we can all replicate your circuit and start to fine tune the circuit to maximize the free part of it!

Kator01 · « **Reply #122 on:** October 12, 2008, 03:22:21 AM »

Dear one,

you mix up Charge ( Q ) with W ( Energy ) in your formula.

Energy W for 12 Volt in a Capacitor with 0.5 Farad = 12 V exp2 * 1/2 + 0.5 F = 36 Joule ( Watt sec )

Two caps with 9 Volt will have : W = 2 * ( 9 V exp2 *1/2 * 0.5 F ) = 2 * 20.25 J = 40.5 Joule

which gives you 107,5 % more energy in both caps related to 36 Joule - not 150 %

Please be more accurate.

Kator

sulake · « **Reply #123 on:** October 12, 2008, 02:18:53 PM »

Oh! How stupid of me!

If the energy stored in capacitor (12V 0.5F) is divided in two capacitors the resulting voltages would be 8.5V and 8.5V not 6V!
My bad! Well, it was two a clock at night in my time zone.

The point was, using only capacitors, gives a firm proof of the efficiency of your circuit, without the need of a fancy and expensive measurement instruments.
Anybody can do this and the results are there for others to replicate. This is not the case when the system involves unknown amount of energy stored in a chemical form. You just can not replicate something that includes an â€œalmost dead battery that is almost emptyâ€.
Voltage of a battery does not tell accurately about the energy stored in it. Even if it where brand new off the shelve one. Voltage of a capacitor does tell you that.
(http://www.hotlinkfiles.com/files/1942192_kydsw/OUdevice.JPG)

dodoshlodo · « **Reply #124 on:** January 17, 2009, 11:49:12 AM »

Hi Everyone,

I've been following this forum and the Imhotep Radiant Oscillator for a while now but this is my first post...

I just wanted to share my simple replication with everyone.

This video is great for someone starting out at this who wants to get a radiant oscillator working. Instead of a relay I'm using the Earth Ground sort of as an antenna/oscillator:
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=wXKR7rJdze8

This video goes more in depth into the radiant oscillator, now using a PWM circuit. I can achieve some 'Tesla Like' Transmission of energy and one wire transmission. I can also light up 100V neons on the low voltage side and create one wire spark gaps that spark into thin air. Anyway its al explained in the video, check it out.
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=1_AGbBsa45E

I have been noticing some very strange things happening with this circuit and am haing loads of fun experimenting with it. If someone can tell me how i could implement secondary battery charging into this it would be much appreciated

-shlodo
I haven't had much success

ourbobby · « **Reply #125 on:** January 17, 2009, 10:34:55 PM »

Quote from: sulake on October 12, 2008, 01:55:19 AM

Generally, state of a battery charge is useless when trying to find out, if your circuit is OU or not. Electrical energy is stored in a chemical form and that causes problems. When you charge the battery and then stop charging, the voltage starts to go down for a while. What is the current charge of your battery right now? Are you sure? No you are not!
Using battery will cause huge errors in your energy calculations all the time. You can not ever accurately state how much energy is in your battery. Also, all cheap normal meters give huge errors when you are using pulsed DC or just any other shape of AC than pure sine wave. You can not state how much energy went in to the battery.
Instead of batteries, you can use capacitors.

What is a battery if its not a form of Capacitor? If you look at your circuits/experiments and treat the battery as a capacitor you might be surprised how your thinking/concepts can be extended. IMHO, it is not mission critical to understand the minutae of capacitor - battery differential. If your " device " is OU you will know!! A lot experiments out there are rehashes of other experiments. To get to OU you have to start thinking about how capacitors can be charged without being charged!!!

Regards

JustAnElectrician · « **Reply #126 on:** December 05, 2009, 07:05:28 AM »

Quote from: Vortex1 on August 05, 2008, 04:47:54 PM

The Hubbard design is one of about five devices that I have any faith may be made to work.

Vortex1, my entire search for free energy has consisted of narrowing down the possibilities, to the most promising avenues and devices. I have gained a lot of knowledge in wide areas by
getting an overview of theory and machines.

Would you be so kind as to list the other 4 devices and any other footnotes that would help a young seeker of wisdom? I would like to move forward with a minimum of duplication, and it seems you can be a big help! Thanks so much,

Rob

FreeEnergy · « **Reply #127 on:** December 05, 2009, 01:00:29 PM »

Quote from: ourbobby on January 17, 2009, 10:34:55 PM

To get to OU you have to start thinking about how capacitors can be charged without being charged!!!

Paul-R · « **Reply #128 on:** December 06, 2009, 12:38:59 PM »

Quote from: JustAnElectrician on December 05, 2009, 07:05:28 AM

Would you be so kind as to list the other 4 devices and any other
footnotes that would help a young seeker of wisdom?

You should download this:
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk

JustAnElectrician · « **Reply #129 on:** December 23, 2009, 03:34:17 AM »

Quote from: **~imhotep~** on August 04, 2008, 11:56:37 PM

thank you very much, me and Dr Peter Lindemann worked hard on this project and if you have been in the fe community very long you know Peters reputation he is a genius . i tried very hard to make something that could easily be built to study tesla as well as bedini and get some efficient EMERGENCY light. if you want dont take a chance on a 1.50 cent bulb then use it for a ultra efficient ssg i have tested my setup for months for 1 hour intervals and it still works great .the first test ran for 72 hours straight and did not run down the source battery and charged a second battery to boot you got to love the simplicity. if you need more detailed schematics they will be on my new website www.imhotepslab.com soon i will be investigating ,with experts all fe devices and releasing to the public all findings i am here to serve you all for free. get it free energy (my energy) i will be releasing power factor correcting for the standard cfl's as well as a 2 part simple charger soon keep watching and i hope you all like it. **~imhotep~**

YOU TELL THEM IMHOTEP!!! I'm getting more pissed as I read the BS here, I know this is old
stuff BUT I HAVE USED your Devices FOR ALMOST A YEAR NOW AND TEHY WORK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am currently conditioning some NiMH batteries and others for OU TRIALS, it is so compelling
that I believe it will work! BTW, I abide @ Imhotep's Lab and TEEP, there is definite critical
thinking both places, but NOT the snide undercutting remarks like I am seeing here, and OU
is a good forum, but I believe it has it's share of MOLES and FE Hating Jack Asses that just try
and disrupt the process and cast doubt, NON-constructive criticism, and hate.

No offense to those who are really trying to work together, none whatsoever.
If the shoe don't fit, then don't wear it!

Rob

JustAnElectrician · « **Reply #130 on:** December 23, 2009, 03:57:28 AM »

Quote from: Vortex1 on August 08, 2008, 07:29:24 PM

Omega_0
This dual battery scheme with one charging the other is just sleight of hand. With a little skill, the circuit could be arranged with a single primary battery such that the flyback pulse charges the primary battery. The circuit will still run down the primary battery.

SO? PUT UP OR SHUT UP, Hundreds of Bedini experimenters have tried and failed to "CLOSE THE LOOP" so IF YOU KNOW HOW, then PUT UP OR SHUT UP!
Hate to be rude, but IMO it's just a red herring. PROVE ME WRONG.

Do extremely careful measurements of the energy budget in this type of circuit to cut through the BS.

To get a quick look at how the energy moves around the circuit, use large electrolytic capacitors instead of batteries as pointed out by others many times earlier.

Bedini will not do this (the single battery), thats why he is able to keep his snake oil show on the road.

Sooner or later, the truth of this type of intellectual scam will be revealed. Sorry Bedini believers, I bought his book, built his devices, and followed his claims from the very beginning (80's) and my tests show no OU.

But Bedini slips and slides around a lot, and when confronted on the OU issue, he backtracks to "just a better way to charge batteries". Pulse battery charging has been around a long, long time.

If any disagree, go ahead with it, you will certainly learn a few eye opening facts along the way, but only if you take careful energy measurements.

Just tryin to save y'all some time.

Let's see it V1

TIA Rob

JustAnElectrician · « **Reply #131 on:** December 23, 2009, 04:20:06 AM »

Quote from: ourbobby on October 11, 2008, 02:41:57 PM

Hi there,
I would like to quote John bedini at this point when he states that after 35 years of searching for FE, he has come to the conclusion that all that has been discovered is "reactive" power. He's talking BEMF in my opinion.

Also, IMHO, you will not induce the FE that you want to find using inductors alone. Why? The reason is the BEMF. As soon as an inductor - with or without load - is "charged", it requires a constant charge to maintain its polarisation - my definition - until it reaches a point where this charge cannot be maintained and reverses- even if you hold the charge at the point before BEMF, a charge is required to create a field change. Anyway you look at it, inductances cannot serve to provide a continous flow. It has to "pulse" a flow. Which is why we have a reference to reactive power. Pulse flow brings us back to "grid" power

The question you have to ask yourself, and not with the notion of classical theory, is why does the inductance have to return to a neutral level? The reason is, perhaps. that the earth magnetic field requires it. The flux generation in an inductance can always only be a temporary distraction in a larger field. In direct contrast, if you charge a capacitor - without a load - it will retain its charge, and can in fact spontaneously increase its charge. The difference in comprehension of these two naturally occurring phenomena will lead to understanding in greater depth, the way to creating FE.

Regards

A quote without context is

When and where? Not calling BS, but
I need to see more on this. I agree with your summation BTW.

Rob

the_big_m_in_ok · « **Reply #132 on:** June 30, 2011, 09:33:26 PM »

Quote from: Paul-R on December 06, 2009, 12:38:59 PM

You should download this:
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk

Another site address:
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/PJKBook.html
Warning:
32 MB @ ~2,200PP 4 1/2 to 6 mins to download.

--Lee

triffid · « **Reply #133 on:** January 09, 2012, 04:56:54 PM »

the_big_m_in_ok · « **Reply #134 on:** January 10, 2012, 09:02:23 PM »

Quote from: triffid on January 09, 2012, 04:56:54 PM

test

triffid,
I'll be spending my time on OUR.com for then foreseeable future. It's got the most potential for my future research efforts, IMHO.
There's something else: Cultural American evolution and the human Free Will working all the time, may make my prediction of an economic collapse gradual rather than sudden. For example, people may finally realize, in Europe and America, that the Muslim threat to the West is getting worse and finally do something about their violently aggressive religious zeal. And not necessarily with another 9/11.

The world is different than I thought it would be when I started the "I see an economic disaster coming..." thread.

--Lee

News:

User Menu