Language:
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.
 Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here: https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

Custom Search

### Author Topic: Infinity Coil  (Read 152580 times)

#### z.monkey

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 1660
##### Infinity Coil
« on: July 12, 2008, 02:12:41 AM »
Howdy Y'all,

This thread is going to document the construction of the Infinity Coil.  This device is based on the Hubbard Coil, a free energy device which was build by Alfred M. Hubbard in the early part of the 20th century (1919).  There is a legend of this device which powered a boat around Portage Bay, Washington for several hours, with an annotation that the device would periodically levitate.  In the Hubbard Coil thread EMDevices is attempting to replicate the Hubbard Coil using Cook coils.  GiantKiller has has some initial success with his four air coil setup.  My take on this design is eight solenoids connected in series in a loop.  The operational theory is that when an initializing, temporary DC pulse is applied to this device can operate for an extended period of time, perhaps even perpetually.  Additionally, I am speculating that additional energy can be extracted from the device without altering the initial charge and operation of the device.  Theoretically the device can supply a great amount of power, far beyond its initial charge.

The operational theory is that there is a charge that is cycled between the inductors in a loop.  Current leads the voltage in an inductor by 90 degrees.  This phase delay is the method in which this device works.  An inductor is charged, developing a magnetic flux field.  As the charging current is stopped, the inductors magnetic field will collapse, generating a current flow out of the coil.  The current flows around the loop into the adjacent inductors and develop magnetic flux fields within them.  This continues around the loop infinitely.  Theoretically there should be a loss of charge as the current encounters the resistance of the wire in the inductors.  However the unique nature of a set of coils in this configuration seems to be drawing extra energy from an unknown source.  I can speculate that this energy is coming from subspace, the Etheric Plane, or another dimension in spacetime.  Truth is I don't know firmly where it is coming from.  This is what we are going to figure out here in this thread.  I do not know for sure if "free" energy is a physical matter phenomena, or if it something from a alternate plane or dimension.

Initial construction plans call for the construction of eight primary coils which have one inch diameter iron rod cores.  The secondary is a single two inch diameter iron rod core.  Both the primary and secondary cores will be wound with 22 gauge stranded wire with heavy insulation.  The charge initiator will be a 12 Volt SLAB (Sealed Lead Acid Battery) and a momentary switch.  The central output coil will have terminals to connect various loads.  I am going to keep this project as simple as possible. Eventually there will be a feedback circuit to recharge the SLAB.

Based on GiantKiller's preliminary success the Infinity Coil is looking very promising.

Here's to our success...

Blessed Be Brothers...
« Last Edit: July 12, 2008, 03:01:04 AM by z.monkey »

#### ramset

• Hero Member
• Posts: 7948
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2008, 03:10:29 AM »
Z SO ITS A BUILD  do you need /want replicaters ? Chet

#### z.monkey

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 1660
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2008, 03:19:23 AM »
Howdy Ramset,

Absolutely!  I will post all construction details on this thread.

Here is the preliminary schematic...

Blessed Be Brothers...

#### ramset

• Hero Member
• Posts: 7948
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2008, 04:17:01 AM »
Z SWEET thanks will follow and replicate as you post info   Chet PS I like how this coil came to the world!!

#### z.monkey

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 1660
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2008, 02:07:08 PM »
Howdy Y'all,

The coffee is kicking in and I noticed that there are a few details I left out of the initial post.

The name of the coil is representative of the way it works.  Look at the diagram in the first post.  The annotations on the coils are the voltage phase in degrees.  On the top side the phases represent a sine wave.  On the bottom side the phases represent an arcsine wave.  If you represent both a sine wave and an arcsine wave in the same space you get an infinity symbol.  This is more than a name and a symbol, it represents the way the device works.  By having eight primary cores electrically you create an infinity wave structure in the device.  This is the operational philosophy where the initial charge initiates the wave structure, and the nature of the device allows the wave to continue traveling within the device.  The secondary output coil is inductively coupled and is usurping power from the oscillating primaries.  The eight primary cores surround the secondary, aligned longitudinally, and spaced at 45 degree increments around the diameter of the secondary.   The secondary is inductively coupled so the primary cores need to be in close proximity to the secondary.

I have noticed that there is a lot of bad information out there concerning the Hubbard Coil  Whether this is lack of understanding on the writers part, disinformation, or misinformation I don't know.  I have been researching the Hubbard coil for close to 20 years.  I have built many of the interpretations that I have read about.  While this is extremely frustrating it did teach me what not to do.  And what I have learned I am putting into the Infinity Coil.  I have seen many way overcomplicated interpretations.  I have seen on analysis recently which beat the coil to death with math.  Bottom line is keep it simple.  Real power in nature is NEVER complicated.  It may be complex in understanding, but the fundamental mechanism is simple in nature.  Same with the Infinity Coil.  We are only using one kind of wire on all the windings.  The cores are all uniform and fabricated out of the same materials.  The circuit surrounding the coil with as simple as possible and not use semiconductors if possible.  If we do use semiconductor they will be the most simple, and rugged available.  Perhaps the most important thing is the cost.  I plan to ferret out the most cost effective, and commonly available materials to fabricate the device.

Remember, keep it simple, and cost effective.

Lightning in a bottle.

Blessed Be Brothers...

#### TheOne

• Hero Member
• Posts: 985
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2008, 03:24:37 PM »
Looks interesting invention, I found a new patent (2006) that looks quite similar to that they even talk about hubbard in it

#### pese

• TPU-Elite
• Hero Member
• Posts: 1597
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2008, 03:59:04 PM »
Looks interesting invention, I found a new patent (2006) that looks quite similar to that they even talk about hubbard in it

Jes this is similar , BUT this was done and working  by HUBBARD

you ca fine some informations here: www.nuenergy.org/pdf/hubbard.pdf

O have lot of pictures an shematas also. If interested i send them.

I is (nearly)the same tat is described in Patents

Gustav Pese

#### TheOne

• Hero Member
• Posts: 985
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #7 on: July 12, 2008, 04:14:39 PM »
I read that on some site its quite interesting, Do you believe he really used radioactive material? More I think about it more I think he probably used some kind of crystal like in the Testatika machines, something that he found himself outside before experimenting with radium with the company that buy his invention.

#### pese

• TPU-Elite
• Hero Member
• Posts: 1597
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #8 on: July 12, 2008, 04:48:34 PM »
I read that on some site its quite interesting, Do you believe he really used radioactive material? More I think about it more I think he probably used some kind of crystal like in the Testatika machines, something that he found himself outside before experimenting with radium with the company that buy his invention.

I have found my sources now:

> ------------------------------- hubbard
> http://www.amasci.com/freenrg/hubbard1.txt

http://www.rexresearch.com/hubbard/hubbard.htm
http://pese.150m.com/fe/FE-hubb.html

http://pese.150m.com/hubb/  here you find ALL

http://pese.150m.com/hubb/sparkplug.html
http://atl2.netfirms.com/engy/mutch/matrixlaw/hubbard.htm
http://rexresearch.com/hubbard/hubbard.htm
http://amasci.com/freenrg/hubbard1.txt
http://www.linux-host.org/energy/shubbard.html
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,1761.1450.html
http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2206

----------------------

hubbard KNOW the radiating metals (as moray.
perhaps only not dangerously ?ow powering sources have done an function as an catalyt (to bring the device in oszillation.
I belive aswell that TESLA CAR  have workes with his tubes 70L7 also that way,
that the "active" wmission from the tube "cathodes" have pushed the device.
Remeber that he used an tube that need 70volts heating voltage )instead
12 volt tubes.  In that car was installed only one 12 volt accu. So Tesla have "underheated the tube.
The tube have not amplifier or rectified as an "normal working" tube !
So he have used aotherway (and source in that tube.
Even it is know that other inventors have used "little ?harles probes" of radiant sources
to reveive powerfull electrical oscillations.

This devices must not be "suspect" BUT UNEANTED for the energa suppliers...
Not all that "radiate" must be "radio-active rasiating . But anyway , some of this sources are
used from some (most or all) this "inventors"

I dont know the secrets,

http://beam.to/zpe

Gustav Pese

Possibly you find above  the bst collection over Hubbard .
If sombody have other "powerful" links over him.
Pls use (also anonymously possibel) Answerback here
http.//beam.to/zpe
« Last Edit: July 12, 2008, 05:29:10 PM by pese »

#### ramset

• Hero Member
• Posts: 7948
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #9 on: July 13, 2008, 05:45:42 AM »
Z whats your opinion on this? I know there are two trails of thought on Hubbard and radiation or not? Chet

#### z.monkey

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 1660
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #10 on: July 14, 2008, 12:19:24 PM »
Howdy Y'all,

Ramset, the these type transformers use inductive self resonance to oscillate.  They generate a strange magnetic flux pattern that forms a vortex in the center coil.  This vortex accelerates the the flow of magnetic flux through the device which generates the power gain.  I suspect that Soft Particles are the source of energy that we are seeing here.  The magnetic flux vortex is drawing Soft Particles in to the device where they disintegrate and manifest as the extra energy.  These type devices do not need radiating elements to generate energy.  Using a radioactive substance in them would poison everything around the device.

Pese, Thanks for that plethora of information.  That is by far the biggest Hubbard collection I have ever seen.  What do you think of the Infinity Wave Theory?

More on Soft Particles here...
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4255.0.html

More schematics coming.  Going to the hardware store today to pick up the core materials.  Then I'll have to spend a few days machining the materials.  In the spirit of conservation of effort I am going to use the same core design as on the Soft Particle Reactor.  The primary cores will be a 1/2 inch inside diameter by 8 inch long iron plumbing pipe.  A 1/2 inch by 10 inch long machine screw fills the space inside the pipe and provides more core material, as well as hold the coil together.  The secondary will be constructed from a 1 inch inside diameter iron plumbing pipe and filled with 1/8 inch diameter iron rods.  I'll build 2 end plates out of some sort of hardwood, I used poplar before.  The end plates hold the ends of the bolts, so we can drill an array of 1/2" holes to hold the primary coils in the proper orientation.  The secondary coil will be held in place by the primary coils.  I am working on the mechanical drawings.  I downloaded FastCAD 7.1 to make good electronic copies.

Blessed Be Brothers...

#### ramset

• Hero Member
• Posts: 7948
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #11 on: July 14, 2008, 02:59:58 PM »
z couple questions  can grade 2  1/2 inch threaded rod be used  or plain rod ? they make 1/2 inch flat head internally threaded posts  for the ends   also 1/8 bald rod for the inside? I want to use identical components  Iron psi and metals/properties  also is ABS or Plexi OK just some ideas to standardize the build  This is your show will go with whatever you decide    Chet

#### z.monkey

• elite_member
• Hero Member
• Posts: 1660
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #12 on: July 14, 2008, 03:41:15 PM »
Howdy Ramset,

The reason I am using machine screws is to hold the coils together.  You can use rods if you like.  You will have to find another way to keep the coils together.  The hardware grade should be as low as possible.  The softer the material is the better it will work in this application.  This is why I chose iron plumbing pipes for the main part of the core.  They are not designed to be structure, rather they are designed to seal well, hence soft iron.  The 1/2 inch bolts are the most common you would find at the hardware store.  Low grade, cheap price, good for flux conduction.  The primary core internal rods are also from the hardware store, in the iron stock section.  Most hardware stores have a variety of rod and tube stock.  If you can get iron rods that would be best, but low grade carbon steel will work too.  Plastic or Plexiglas are acceptable for the end plates.  I like using hardwood because I do carpentry and I generally have some nice wood scraps hanging around.  You'll notice in my other posts every project I do has wood in it.  This coil should scale well.  I have been thinking of doing a miniature one for portable stuff, and a giant one to run my air conditioning compressor...

Blessed Be Brothers...

#### ramset

• Hero Member
• Posts: 7948
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #13 on: July 14, 2008, 03:58:47 PM »
Z Thanks for the info   most hardware[cheap stuff] is to grade 2 specs no problem    wood only gives me concern in its ability to retain moisture  maybe some conductivity?  I can research softer rod if you feel it could help [im VERY well connected with these manufacturers]  Chet PS nice attic job

#### armagdn03

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 441
##### Re: Infinity Coil
« Reply #14 on: July 14, 2008, 11:23:21 PM »
Howdy Y'all,

This thread is going to document the construction of the Infinity Coil.  This device is based on the Hubbard Coil, a free energy device which was build by Alfred M. Hubbard in the early part of the 20th century (1919).  There is a legend of this device which powered a boat around Portage Bay, Washington for several hours, with an annotation that the device would periodically levitate.  In the Hubbard Coil thread EMDevices is attempting to replicate the Hubbard Coil using Cook coils.  GiantKiller has has some initial success with his four air coil setup.  My take on this design is eight solenoids connected in series in a loop.  The operational theory is that when an initializing, temporary DC pulse is applied to this device can operate for an extended period of time, perhaps even perpetually.  Additionally, I am speculating that additional energy can be extracted from the device without altering the initial charge and operation of the device.  Theoretically the device can supply a great amount of power, far beyond its initial charge.

The operational theory is that there is a charge that is cycled between the inductors in a loop.  Current leads the voltage in an inductor by 90 degrees.  This phase delay is the method in which this device works.  An inductor is charged, developing a magnetic flux field.  As the charging current is stopped, the inductors magnetic field will collapse, generating a current flow out of the coil.  The current flows around the loop into the adjacent inductors and develop magnetic flux fields within them.  This continues around the loop infinitely.  Theoretically there should be a loss of charge as the current encounters the resistance of the wire in the inductors.  However the unique nature of a set of coils in this configuration seems to be drawing extra energy from an unknown source.  I can speculate that this energy is coming from subspace, the Etheric Plane, or another dimension in spacetime.  Truth is I don't know firmly where it is coming from.  This is what we are going to figure out here in this thread.  I do not know for sure if "free" energy is a physical matter phenomena, or if it something from a alternate plane or dimension.

Initial construction plans call for the construction of eight primary coils which have one inch diameter iron rod cores.  The secondary is a single two inch diameter iron rod core.  Both the primary and secondary cores will be wound with 22 gauge stranded wire with heavy insulation.  The charge initiator will be a 12 Volt SLAB (Sealed Lead Acid Battery) and a momentary switch.  The central output coil will have terminals to connect various loads.  I am going to keep this project as simple as possible. Eventually there will be a feedback circuit to recharge the SLAB.

Based on GiantKiller's preliminary success the Infinity Coil is looking very promising.

Here's to our success...

Blessed Be Brothers...

Im writing this to save you alot of time that could be better spent.

In your diagram, you will notice that there is one coil between input leads, and many more circling around, the charge will be distributed between all coils simultaneously with an AC signal, with most (80 percent or so) going through the path of least resistance, this being the coil centering the AC input. Upon collapse the charge will have nowhere to go, so if the freq is fast enough, it will be absorbed into the parasitic capacitance of the coil, and recycled for oscillation with the inductance, as all circuits with capacitance and inductance do under the correct conditions, (an effect which could be taken advantage of, but not in line with the workings of this device according to your description) or it will collapse, and the momentum of it will cary on into the negative cycle of the AC current being fed into it. With this setup, 80 percent of the energetic effects will be taking place in one coil alone, and it will not work in a circular pattern. All coils will charge, and all will discharge at the same time. Along with this flaw, you have not taken into account resonance between any of the components.

not that you cant build this device and get it to work, just rethink your game plan.

Good luck!