Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stan Deyo  (Read 7301 times)

Bennyboy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Stan Deyo
« on: July 10, 2008, 12:40:06 PM »
Hi all, I'm fairly new in this whole OU scene and associated topics (antigravity, UFO's etc).  I'm sure you'll all agree that there are very interesting characters, plenty of clowns and many who seem to excel at misinformation.  One individual that seems to pop up quite a bit and is particularly interesting to me is the topic subject - Stan Deyo.

Considering this man's purported background (if true) and seemingly extensive knowledge of AG and propulsions systems (if correct), I find it intriguing that he has continued (to be allowed) to publicise his knowledge since the late 70's.

I'm curious to hear what others more involved in these areas and more knowledgable than myself have to say regarding his theories and ideas and also the man himself?

Your time and opinions are welcomed!

Cheers,
Ben.

greendoor

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: Stan Deyo
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2008, 07:52:29 AM »
I read Cosmic Conspiracy sometime in the 1980's, and it blew my mind.  I found the book in a Christian bookshop - a good source of ideas from some wacky out-there people.  I was so inspired by the free energy ideas, I rang Stan Deyo (he was in Australia at the time) and had a short conversation putting me onto some sources of information, although I got the impression the call was monitored and he couldn't speak freely.

I just don't know what to make of him.  He seems to feature in Christian circles.  As a Christian myself, I got the impression he was a genuine Christian, and a genuine engineer, and he certainly has a very colorful story and his books are a great read.  He provided a lot of excellent material, before the days when the internet made a lot more available.

His story is so strange, it's probably true.  Real life can be stranger than fiction.  As he said himself in Cosmic Conspiracy - he writes on multiple levels.  Christians will pick up on the Christian message in what he talks about.  I notice that he seems to address the Masonic or Rosicruician type people with a message that would resonate with them.  That's where most Christians would wonder what the hell he is talking about ...

Sometimes the truth can be so strange, you just can't come right out and say it.  "Don't cast your pearls before swine, lest they turn again and rend you" ... I think Stan is very measured in what he chooses to give away. 

I find it very easy to believe that there are some extremely rich, powerful and deeply evil people running this planet.  Do you really think that world rulers such as Bush really rule this planet?  Do you think they are answerable to higher people who can pull the strings?  Do you think that the people in these higher levels got their by being nice? 

The information about Bohemian Grove should be of concern to thinking people.  In Christian circles, the belief that the world is temporarily controlled by "the devil" has been around for ages.  I have read personal biographies of people who have been deeply involved in the occult and some very dark things.  Many of these people have talked about the people who really control this planet - and the immense wealth and power that they have. 

But it's not just a few crazy Christians who believe these things - when you start digging, there is plenty of evidence that suggests that people of all beliefs have witnessed similar things. 

For example - take NASA.  Can you even begin to imagine the squillions of dollars that NASA have pissed against the wall?  And for what?  Their work is primarily military - and a few bones are thrown to the public to convince them their tax dollars are having some effect.  But you have no idea what power and wealth has really been developed in secret by those guys. 

So when considering Stan Deyo - consider the bigger picture.  His story is unusual - but I have no problem believing that it could be true.  Ultimately, there are two kingdoms growing side by side in this world. There is a lot at stake, and it goes way beyond life & death on this planet alone.

greendoor

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: Stan Deyo
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2008, 08:06:50 AM »
I might add that on a purely technical level - I have been greatly influenced by Deyo, and more modern research and ideas from many diverse people all vindicate what he has been saying all along.  I am particularly indebted to him for restoring the electrical aether back into my thinking. 

I do believe that there a powerful people/organisations that have technology so advanced that it could be considered alien.  I do believe that they have successfully manipulated conservative science to keep ordinary people away from this higher technology.  Gutting the aether from electromagnetic theory - was that a mistake, or on purpose?  Fortunately, this understanding is coming back - and new technologies will be revealed.

But it is very intriguing to consider that some technologies have existed for many years, and people like Deyo with an insider's knowledge are very interesting. 

I don't think he crazy by any means - he is far too intelligent, and just so right about certain things.  My only question is which kingdom he really works for ... I'm guessing he's a good guy.




Bennyboy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Stan Deyo
« Reply #3 on: July 14, 2008, 04:04:26 AM »
@ greendoor

I agree that his knowledge seems to be quite 'advanced' and some of his ideas tie in with recent findings (i.e. TPU theory), but my real question was based around the fact that he is very polished in his knowledge and presentation and considering no one has tried to 'shut him down' is there a chance he is one of the misinformants or maybe misguided?

Not pointing fingers here, as I'd love him to be the real deal, however in this whole FE area the waters and so muddy, and the lines between information and misinformation are so blurry it is really hard to discriminate sometimes...

Hopefully that made sense!

Cheers,
Ben.

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Stan Deyo
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2008, 11:46:12 PM »
Look at these things in this ordered list. But don't get lost in the detail.

SMOT - Trying to get rolling magnets to do spin work, forever.
Searle - Same rolling, spinning magnets only on a horizontal plane. This guy had results similar to Deyo AG explainations.
Hamel - 3 tiers of spinning magnetics. He lost his first unit into space from free running ground operation. 2nd and 3rd units shut down a 40 square mile electrical grid. MIB came and took his stuff. I have talked with Dansway about this. He is the younger on the website.
Deyo coil - nothing moves but the ringing magnetic field. And beyond. This is the key to things farther on in the operations of field effects.
Hutchison - Things move and change without being touched. Its all done with frequencies.

I emailed Stan Deyo and he simply stated 'Pulsed DC'. This is the real deal for starters.
I have been working this type of operation for 2 years here now.

--giantkiller.

slapper

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 242
Re: Stan Deyo
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2009, 06:46:30 AM »
Looks like Stan is starting to get around to releasing some antigravity information on his website.

http://www.haloorbital.com

Take care.

nap

TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: Stan Deyo
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2009, 07:23:37 AM »

Quote
Not pointing fingers here, as I'd love him to be the real deal, however in this whole FE area the waters and so muddy, and the lines between information and misinformation are so blurry it is really hard to discriminate sometimes...


I'll say, incrimination is the far easier and more common course of action.


You know the old saying, "who's watching the watchers?"


How about, "Whose using the users?"


http://www.hisremnant.org/eby/articles/kingdom/twohands/twohandsof.html


A thoughtful review of the above material can reveal much, answering many questions.  And will raise some very important ones previously unconsidered.  As a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, it is imperative to read the whole of the material, as stopping at a convenient location may serve to reinforce long held and destructive notions.



TS