Author Topic: Hubbard coil (Read 372444 times)

forest · « **Reply #315 on:** April 08, 2009, 06:55:51 PM »

Quote from: TheNOP on April 08, 2009, 06:40:12 PM

witch one would it be ?

probably the last one, but in fact we must think about it from other point of view - what is electron really and thus what is electricity

wings · « **Reply #316 on:** April 08, 2009, 09:10:15 PM »

Quote from: AhuraMazda on April 08, 2009, 06:45:06 PM

My own current thinking is around resonating the position of bloch wall in a magnetic circuit.
By fluctuating and resonating the position of the bloch wall, etheric energy is manipulated into action.
Then it is the matter of collecting the energy produced.
A wire carrying current generates a magnetic field. By wrapping the coil bifilarly we create a bloch wall which we can have control over.

I need to do some basic experiments. I remember an experiment in which the similar poles of two magnets were pushed together and a coil was wrapped over them with a DC motor in series, connected to a DC source. I can't remember what happened next!

I remember a comment by Steven Marks about moving a magnet across thin wires.... ( Don't shoot me if I am wrong). Hubbard uses thin steel wires, so does Stan Meyer.

"By fluctuating and resonating the position of the bloch wall, etheric energy is manipulated into action."

I agree with you ...... probably you like Kunel device:

www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Patents/DE3024814.pdf

The trick in the coils

wings · « **Reply #317 on:** April 08, 2009, 09:19:41 PM »

Quote from: AhuraMazda on April 08, 2009, 02:02:05 PM

Here is a file which has some interesting information about Hubbard Generator:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/14070044/Free-Energy-Hubbard-Coil

much better:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13491267/Some-Free-Energy-Devices-eBook

the_big_m_in_ok · « **Reply #318 on:** April 08, 2009, 09:55:02 PM »

Quote from: AhuraMazda on April 08, 2009, 02:02:05 PM

Here is a file which has some interesting information about Hubbard Generator:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/14070044/Free-Energy-Hubbard-Coil

@everyone,
Here's another link to the same file, from Reply #'312 & #318:

http://www.rexreserch.com/hubbard/hubbard.htm

>>This Overunity.com site also has independent information equal or better than the Rexresearch information.

--Lee
the_big_m_in_ok

giantkiller · « **Reply #319 on:** April 08, 2009, 11:48:10 PM »

Quote from: AhuraMazda on April 08, 2009, 06:45:06 PM

My own current thinking is around resonating the position of bloch wall in a magnetic circuit.
By fluctuating and resonating the position of the bloch wall, etheric energy is manipulated into action.
Then it is the matter of collecting the energy produced.
A wire carrying current generates a magnetic field. By wrapping the coil bifilarly we create a bloch wall which we can have control over.

I need to do some basic experiments. I remember an experiment in which the similar poles of two magnets were pushed together and a coil was wrapped over them with a DC motor in series, connected to a DC source. I can't remember what happened next!

I remember a comment by Steven Marks about moving a magnet across thin wires.... ( Don't shoot me if I am wrong). Hubbard uses thin steel wires, so does Stan Meyer.

By Sparks suggestion I used steel too. You get a controllable core, magamp, bloch wall, and very high acceptance rate of energy. And the biggie is a magfield that is acceptable of other mag fields at any angle.

Look at when a Tesla coil is fired from the bottom and releases energy out of the top. A vertically moving bloch wall?

--giantkiller.

Paul-R · « **Reply #320 on:** September 27, 2009, 03:02:47 PM »

Quote from: giantkiller on January 02, 2009, 04:08:24 AM

Got to add these iron bundles of garden wire.
In the design document he uses gold which is not magentic.

Don't forget that much garden is not iron, but mild steel. And the old
fashioned weldiong rods are hard to find. What is made out of iron?
Paul-R

the_big_m_in_ok · « **Reply #321 on:** September 27, 2009, 07:14:13 PM »

Quote from: Paul-R on September 27, 2009, 03:02:47 PM

Don't forget that much garden is not iron, but mild steel. And the old
fashioned weldiong rods are hard to find. What is made out of iron?
Paul-R

Building construction reinforcing rod(rebar, in America) is made of soft cast iron. Very common as trash in short lengths, especially around construction sites.

--Lee

Paul-R · « **Reply #322 on:** October 06, 2009, 03:40:46 PM »

Quote from: the_big_m_in_ok on September 27, 2009, 07:14:13 PM

Building construction reinforcing rod(rebar, in America) is made of soft cast iron. Very common as trash in short lengths, especially around construction sites.
--Lee

I wonder if you are right. This reinforcing is to make concrete take tension. I would
have thought steel is needed. Iron would crack under tension.

I shall have to find some and test it ability to shed magnetism

the_big_m_in_ok · « **Reply #323 on:** October 06, 2009, 08:45:11 PM »

Paul-R said:

Quote

I would have thought steel is needed.

A lot is used, so adding cost with special alloys would be counterproductive in terms of expense.

Quote

...Iron would crack under tension.

I've seen it bend pretty easily in long lengths on the ground. Short lengths are used because shorter lengths are inherently stiffer.

Quote

I shall have to find some and test it ability to shed magnetism

You could find some and make a transformer out of it.
Please keep in mind: ferro-resonant silico-steel is deliberately used in transformers because it doesn't get as hot as pure iron by excessive magnetic flux. And it still works okay in the meantime.

--Lee

forest · « **Reply #324 on:** October 06, 2009, 11:47:00 PM »

Why not use soft iron to make a copy of original signal just shifted in phase of 90 degrees ? Why not send it around shifting around in circle to produce big kick ? what is going on with electric current if it pass along wire which is going on across magnetic shield ?

the_big_m_in_ok · « **Reply #325 on:** October 07, 2009, 05:25:24 PM »

Quote from: forest
[quote

...what is going on with electric current if it pass along wire which is going on across magnetic shield ?

@forest
I would have to go and look later to be sure, but I have a basic electronic book at home that has a graphic showing when an AC current is applied to a wire, the current and magnetic field are 90deg. out of phase with each other in the wire.
Sorry, a disclaimer:
I have no way to upload and drawing or picture from a borrowed computer where I live, or I'd show you when I find out. But, if I find the reference, I can only cite it.

--Lee

forest · « **Reply #326 on:** October 07, 2009, 08:43:19 PM »

sorry you misunderstood.magnetic shield acts on current
simply : current flowing around soft magnetic material causes magnetization up to the saturation then if current is removed magnetic material release magnetic field as electric current into nearby wire

what if in conductor there is AC flowing first above magnetic shield then to the place under it ? AC causes saturation of shield but it's also flowing further, at zero AC crossing ,magnetic shield release energy as echo signal shifted in time comparing to original.This echo signal looks like noise because it probably is generated in AC direction and agaisnt it also (both directions)

Does this process alone TAKES ENERGY FROM ORIGINAL SIGNAL

??

And what is going on later ?

I presume that echo signal flowing in opposite direction nullify with original signal if we are able to shift it 180 or 360 degrees or any other to match original signal.The echo flowing in direction of original signal replace now original signal EXCEPT IT IS MOVED IN PLACE due to phase shifts.
The results imho is rotating AC current in other words AC which is continuously moving phase.
Maybe there is something to accumulate effect and if there is something to make this AC not symmetric (for example positive a little bit stronger then negative part of AC) then result is DC. If symmetry is full then it looks like high frequency AC probably.

End of crazy ideas

giantkiller · « **Reply #327 on:** October 08, 2009, 04:42:06 AM »

Doesn't sound crazy to me!

Quote from: forest on October 07, 2009, 08:43:19 PM

sorry you misunderstood.magnetic shield acts on current
simply : current flowing around soft magnetic material causes magnetization up to the saturation then if current is removed magnetic material release magnetic field as electric current into nearby wire

what if in conductor there is AC flowing first above magnetic shield then to the place under it ? AC causes saturation of shield but it's also flowing further, at zero AC crossing ,magnetic shield release energy as echo signal shifted in time comparing to original.This echo signal looks like noise because it probably is generated in AC direction and agaisnt it also (both directions)

Does this process alone TAKES ENERGY FROM ORIGINAL SIGNAL ??

And what is going on later ?

I presume that echo signal flowing in opposite direction nullify with original signal if we are able to shift it 180 or 360 degrees or any other to match original signal.The echo flowing in direction of original signal replace now original signal EXCEPT IT IS MOVED IN PLACE due to phase shifts.
The results imho is rotating AC current in other words AC which is continuously moving phase.
Maybe there is something to accumulate effect and if there is something to make this AC not symmetric (for example positive a little bit stronger then negative part of AC) then result is DC. If symmetry is full then it looks like high frequency AC probably.

End of crazy ideas

Paul-R · « **Reply #328 on:** August 05, 2010, 06:59:06 PM »

Quote from: PaulLowrance on December 29, 2008, 06:09:11 AM

Is there a good detailed photo of the Hubbard coil?

There is a fair amount of detail in Patrick's Chapter 5
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter5.pdf
but the particulars are sketchy.

As I see it, the design of the secondaries fixes the primary since they
are all meant to be touching.

AWG-4 is a tall order. It is nearer to copper rod than copper wire.
I shall begin with 10mm earth cable as used on building sites.

quarktoo · « **Reply #329 on:** January 04, 2011, 08:53:20 AM »

Understanding the Hubbard coil isn't much more difficult than understanding a spring. Leedscalnin PMH places a negative potential on an inductor and as such, loads the spring. This removes back EMF from the circuit since it is now push pull instead of just pull.

The center inductor just moves the 8 surrounding step up coils which creates and collapses a magnetic field faster than it could normally. The pick up coil surrounds the can.

The reason that he had to strike a wire against a plate for ten minutes to get it started was most likely because he needed to get the two sections balanced - trial and error. The Leedscalnin PMH appears to be the basis of a whole bunch of FE devices.

The light bulb could have been a variable resistor such as the regenerative amp light bulb in series with the center coil which would parallel the outer pickup coil which would have been in series with the load. The other possibility for the light bulb would be to keep the pre-loaded coils loaded - remember Meyer's electron extraction circuit?

The pre-loaded coils without all that nasty resistance and back EMF would accelerate and thus square the output - so 400% OU minus losses would put it around 300% OU as reported. E=MC2

I'm going to take a stab at building this bad boy.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Hubbard coil (Read 372444 times)

forest

Re: Hubbard coil

wings

Re: Hubbard coil

wings

Re: Hubbard coil

the_big_m_in_ok

Re: Hubbard coil

giantkiller

Re: Hubbard coil

Paul-R

Re: Hubbard coil

the_big_m_in_ok

Re: Hubbard coil

Paul-R

Re: Hubbard coil

the_big_m_in_ok

Re: Hubbard coil

forest

Re: Hubbard coil

the_big_m_in_ok

Re: Hubbard coil

forest

Re: Hubbard coil

giantkiller

Re: Hubbard coil

Paul-R

Re: Hubbard coil

quarktoo

Re: Hubbard coil