a pic  i have .... 


not sure if there is more or not ..

ist

put this under the top windings

Given recent posts on the nature of iron wire cores here and in some of the TPU threads and call for brainstorming, I thought I'd toss out an idea for feedback.  It's a twist a twist on the Hubbard Coil that I'm trying to work out mentally before trying out...

+Centre coil actually a toroid consisting in magnetized iron wire core wrapped in layer of cotton fabric.
   Cu coil wrapped around iron wire core in toroid fashion at 45degree angle. Hopefully,
   magnetized Fe core will inductively trigger the Cu coil. 
+Cu coil - both ends run to Avramenko Plug and single wire lead.
+Lead from AV Plug becomes primary on 1st outer coil. 
+Secondary on same (1st outer) coil has both ends terminating in AV plug to diode,
   then to wind as primary onto next coil.
+Primary from 1st coil runs to 2nd coil to be wound as secondary.
+Repeat until you've gone all the way around your circular coil setup.

Here's the thing- Since I'm working with AV plug on secondary, I have to leave end of primary on last coil open.  Two ends of Secondary go to AV plug for single wire transmission.

This is kind of wild, but given the AV plug's close association with radiant energy/CE, I'm wondering if it might move us a little further down the field in the quest for producing and harnessing electricity from an aether vortex.  It might also produce something very dangerous (Grumpy's black hole).  This is part of why I want to put it out there.

Given what has been happenning on Doc Stiffler's SEC thread, it would seem that an increased load placed on a single line transmission from the AV plug will draw increased energy in from the aether/lattice .  Now, maybe we need some caps in there to help the conversion process.  I'm not sure. 
Here's where we cross over into TPU territory, and I apologize. If the centre coil/toroid alone can produce the aether vortex effect, perhaps we don't even need the outer ring of coils. - Then we are dealing with more of a TPU -  We have our AV plug off the  Cu winding. 

If we can't get the AV plug working from this simple arrangement, it may be necessary to substitute a trifilar inductively coupled oscillator circuit using an NPN transistor for the single CU winding. This will  produce pulsed DC (at least thru a rectifier), and the 3rd wire can be sent to an AV plug. Anyhow, see what you think.

Just a note:  I'm the first to admit that I don't know what's going to come off the AV plug lead once it's coiled and a secondary wound over top.  I don't want to put anybody at risk, so it might be good for some of the more knowledgeable members to offer any observations about this kind of proposal.  If this thing does work, consider it my open source gift which has evolved with some help from others whose circuits and insights are posted on this site.
FWIW,
B

http://www.freshpatents.com/Self-sustaining-electric-power-generator-utilizing-electrons-of-low-inertial-mass-to-magnify-inductive-energy-dt20070111ptan20070007844.php

[0006] Newspaper photos (Anon. 1920a) of a more impressive demonstration of Hubbard's fuelless generator show a device described as 14 inches (36 cm) long and 11 inches (28 cm) in diameter connected by four heavy electrical cables to a 35-horsepower (26 kW) electric motor. The motor reportedly propelled an 18-foot open launch around a lake at a speed of 8 to 10 knots (Anon. 1920b). The event was witnessed by a cautious news reporter who claims to have checked thoroughly for any wires that might have been connected to hidden batteries by lifting the device and motor from the boat. Radioactive-decay energy can be eliminated as the main power source because about 10.sup.8 times more radium than the entire world's supply would have been needed to equal Hubbard's reported electric energy output of 330 amperes and 124 volts.

[0008] To the Applicant's best knowledge, the only depiction that was made public of the interior components of any of these reported generators consists of a sketchy drawing (Bermann 1928h) of Hubbard's apparatus similar in size to the device shown in his 1919 demonstration. It depicts a complex set of parallel coils measuring 6 inches (15 cm) in length and 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) overall in diameter. Four leads of insulated wire with the insulation peeled back are shown coming out of the end of the device. What those four wires were connected to internally was not shown. Hubbard's description of the internal arrangement of coils in the device generally matches the drawing (Anon. 1920a): "It is made up of a group of eight electro-magnets, each with primary and secondary windings of copper wire, which are arranged around a large steel core. The core likewise has a single winding. About the entire group of cells is a secondary winding." Nothing was reported or depicted about how components functioned with each other, or how much radium was used and where the radium was positioned. The only connectors visible on the drawing were between the outer windings of the eight electromagnet coils. Theses connectors show that the direction of the windings alternated between clockwise and counterclockwise on adjacent coils, so that the polarity of each electromagnet would have been opposite to that of its adjacent neighbors.

"About the entire group of cells is a secondary winding" it says.
I hadn't seen that before...

I hope you can see the similarities.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3354.msg124092.html#msg124092
On the Hubbard, as each outer coil is fired that field hits the center. By enacting a precession the energy is pushed only in one direction.

--giantkiller.

other way....

        Is Mark's tpu really torroidal.  Seems all these devices use some form of Tesla's coilcapacitor spreading the spark gap gain.

Four pairs of a Daniel Cook coil type configuration as a basis? There are 4 wires involved in his arrangement. Was this mentioned already? I'm too lazy to go back and look.