Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Hubbard coil  (Read 371407 times)

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #240 on: August 16, 2008, 11:24:32 PM »
a pic  i have .... 


not sure if there is more or not ..

ist

put this under the top windings



wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #241 on: August 17, 2008, 03:14:03 AM »
@EM

On page 7 of the Coler document, when the current is switched off on the primary, a reversing current results. This is what happened in @allcanadians' small circuit on the The Tesla Project thread. I had tried this myself and shown that on current applied, a small DC motor turned clockwise about 45 degrees, total degrees depended on the capacitor value, and when current was removed the motor turned counterclockwise back to its original position. This showed that with one pulse application, the motor moved twice. 

Back in April 2008, I had put up the Coler circuit on the @JD thread because @JD had mentioned Coler in one of his posts. Hmmmmm.

So the six coils are wound over magnets?
Pass a small current in bailing wire and it becomes magnetized. I have done this and checked with my compass.
Anyways, thanks for this doc.

Bob Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 733
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #242 on: August 22, 2008, 06:30:17 AM »
Given recent posts on the nature of iron wire cores here and in some of the TPU threads and call for brainstorming, I thought I'd toss out an idea for feedback.  It's a twist a twist on the Hubbard Coil that I'm trying to work out mentally before trying out...

+Centre coil actually a toroid consisting in magnetized iron wire core wrapped in layer of cotton fabric.
   Cu coil wrapped around iron wire core in toroid fashion at 45degree angle. Hopefully,
   magnetized Fe core will inductively trigger the Cu coil. 
+Cu coil - both ends run to Avramenko Plug and single wire lead.
+Lead from AV Plug becomes primary on 1st outer coil. 
+Secondary on same (1st outer) coil has both ends terminating in AV plug to diode,
   then to wind as primary onto next coil.
+Primary from 1st coil runs to 2nd coil to be wound as secondary.
+Repeat until you've gone all the way around your circular coil setup.

Here's the thing- Since I'm working with AV plug on secondary, I have to leave end of primary on last coil open.  Two ends of Secondary go to AV plug for single wire transmission.

This is kind of wild, but given the AV plug's close association with radiant energy/CE, I'm wondering if it might move us a little further down the field in the quest for producing and harnessing electricity from an aether vortex.  It might also produce something very dangerous (Grumpy's black hole???).  This is part of why I want to put it out there.

Given what has been happenning on Doc Stiffler's SEC thread, it would seem that an increased load placed on a single line transmission from the AV plug will draw increased energy in from the aether/lattice .  Now, maybe we need some caps in there to help the conversion process.  I'm not sure. 
Here's where we cross over into TPU territory, and I apologize. If the centre coil/toroid alone can produce the aether vortex effect, perhaps we don't even need the outer ring of coils. - Then we are dealing with more of a TPU -  We have our AV plug off the  Cu winding. 

If we can't get the AV plug working from this simple arrangement, it may be necessary to substitute a trifilar inductively coupled oscillator circuit using an NPN transistor for the single CU winding. This will  produce pulsed DC (at least thru a rectifier), and the 3rd wire can be sent to an AV plug. Anyhow, see what you think.

Just a note:  I'm the first to admit that I don't know what's going to come off the AV plug lead once it's coiled and a secondary wound over top.  I don't want to put anybody at risk, so it might be good for some of the more knowledgeable members to offer any observations about this kind of proposal.  If this thing does work, consider it my open source gift which has evolved with some help from others whose circuits and insights are posted on this site.
FWIW,
B

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #243 on: August 24, 2008, 12:11:28 AM »
EM sorry to barge in, but your an antennae Guy and if you havent seen this you must [From user sirmikey1]   Chet
                                               http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdup42Epq0o 

epiphany

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #244 on: August 29, 2008, 07:00:17 AM »
http://www.freshpatents.com/Self-sustaining-electric-power-generator-utilizing-electrons-of-low-inertial-mass-to-magnify-inductive-energy-dt20070111ptan20070007844.php

[0006] Newspaper photos (Anon. 1920a) of a more impressive demonstration of Hubbard's fuelless generator show a device described as 14 inches (36 cm) long and 11 inches (28 cm) in diameter connected by four heavy electrical cables to a 35-horsepower (26 kW) electric motor. The motor reportedly propelled an 18-foot open launch around a lake at a speed of 8 to 10 knots (Anon. 1920b). The event was witnessed by a cautious news reporter who claims to have checked thoroughly for any wires that might have been connected to hidden batteries by lifting the device and motor from the boat. Radioactive-decay energy can be eliminated as the main power source because about 10.sup.8 times more radium than the entire world's supply would have been needed to equal Hubbard's reported electric energy output of 330 amperes and 124 volts.

[0008] To the Applicant's best knowledge, the only depiction that was made public of the interior components of any of these reported generators consists of a sketchy drawing (Bermann 1928h) of Hubbard's apparatus similar in size to the device shown in his 1919 demonstration. It depicts a complex set of parallel coils measuring 6 inches (15 cm) in length and 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) overall in diameter. Four leads of insulated wire with the insulation peeled back are shown coming out of the end of the device. What those four wires were connected to internally was not shown. Hubbard's description of the internal arrangement of coils in the device generally matches the drawing (Anon. 1920a): "It is made up of a group of eight electro-magnets, each with primary and secondary windings of copper wire, which are arranged around a large steel core. The core likewise has a single winding. About the entire group of cells is a secondary winding." Nothing was reported or depicted about how components functioned with each other, or how much radium was used and where the radium was positioned. The only connectors visible on the drawing were between the outer windings of the eight electromagnet coils. Theses connectors show that the direction of the windings alternated between clockwise and counterclockwise on adjacent coils, so that the polarity of each electromagnet would have been opposite to that of its adjacent neighbors.

"About the entire group of cells is a secondary winding" it says.
I hadn't seen that before...





epiphany

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #245 on: August 29, 2008, 06:22:46 PM »
So that patent was saying that the 8 coils each have a secondary. There is a central large coil and now an outer coil? So a total of 18 coils, with only 4 external wires.

That patent mentioned alternating north and south poles on the 8 coils too.

It would be nice to find another reference to this outer wrap and the north south orientation somewhere else, or find out if all of this information is wrong.

Is this just a big self priming ~ignition coil? 2 external wires for the primary circuit and 2 for the secondary (load) ??

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #246 on: August 29, 2008, 08:54:37 PM »
I hope you can see the similarities.
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,3354.msg124092.html#msg124092
On the Hubbard, as each outer coil is fired that field hits the center. By enacting a precession the energy is pushed only in one direction.

--giantkiller.

pese

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1597
    • Freie Energie und mehr ... Free energy and more ...
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #247 on: August 30, 2008, 12:38:07 AM »
Ist any luck finding  the schematics ?  Chet
Here:

GP

pese

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1597
    • Freie Energie und mehr ... Free energy and more ...
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #248 on: August 30, 2008, 12:47:57 AM »
Here: Thisone with "geometrie" (dimensions) the current wil directed also over(inner),, low rated magnetic "soft-iron core".

GP

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #249 on: August 30, 2008, 04:52:43 PM »

On the Hubbard, as each outer coil is fired that field hits the center. By enacting a precession the energy is pushed only in one direction.

--giantkiller.

finally...

pese

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1597
    • Freie Energie und mehr ... Free energy and more ...
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #250 on: August 31, 2008, 03:22:49 PM »
other way....

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #251 on: August 31, 2008, 05:55:51 PM »
other way....

Making 304 a secondary to the 307. Bifilar. The loose winding of 307 is used for creating a field and very low inductance? I pushes one direction along the shaft. Put alot of turns on the 304 and it starts to look very much like a stretched Tesla coil.
Replace the magnets with coils, stand it up and it looks like a Hubbard / Coler.

http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Library/Library.htm

I am working on a rat shack 26# bifilar and a 22#pancake 512340-b single layer..

--giantkiller.

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #252 on: August 31, 2008, 11:28:21 PM »
        Is Mark's tpu really torroidal.  Seems all these devices use some form of Tesla's coilcapacitor spreading the spark gap gain.

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #253 on: September 01, 2008, 04:33:21 AM »
I see that. Your winding looks the 307 winding. The pulse goes around pushing the whole way.

--giantkiller.

epiphany

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Hubbard coil
« Reply #254 on: September 23, 2008, 08:33:00 PM »
Four pairs of a Daniel Cook coil type configuration as a basis? There are 4 wires involved in his arrangement. Was this mentioned already? I'm too lazy to go back and look. :P