Hi, z.monkey.
Do you make measuring of input-output powers and COP? Have you COP>1?

Hi Folks,
In the TPU Facts & Test Results thread, there were some interesting comments made that might apply here.  First, an interesting observation on coil winding from Godmode (see:  http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4491.msg120714.html#msg120714 )--

"Basically, if we take two conventional coils, and connect them in
series, but orient them such that the poles of the two coils are in
opposition, what is often called 'bucking fields', we will find that the
total inductance is greater than that of a single coil.  The total
energy stored in the fields of the two coils is not significantly
effected by their orientation, and the system is highly inductive.
 
All we have done is to distort the flux, we have not canceled ANY flux
at all.
 
On the other hand, if we were to construct a bifilar coil with exactly
the same ammount of wire, we would find that the coil had nearly no
inductance at all, and stores no significant energy in the form of a
magnetic field."

Moving down in that thread, Grumpy states:
(See: http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4491.msg120720.html#msg120720)
"...then you take several pairs of coils with there slight ether compressing effect and place them in a circle such that the successive pairs can couple and entrain the aether compressed by the previous pairs then you just let it spin like an aether turbine - and a tubine is just a big compressor - CCW in northern and CW in southern  - and it spins up compressing more and more - there is a limit of course so no black holes or supernovas. 

Now you have compressed the field - how do you get power from this?"

I've been working on another project, but have been turning this one over in my mind a few weeks while following along.  Now I'm wondering if Godmode's idea might be worth incorporating into a Hubbard Coil style design.  Does anyone consider this method of winding (ie. coils in opposition to produce bucking effect) worthwhile?  I'm partial to trifilar winding, and am wondering if two windings set up as Godmode suggested might be somehow integrated with a third.  Perhaps the 2 bucking coils could be trifilar themselves, ora third coil could be wrapped around the whole unit.
Guess I'd better get experimenting... )

I'm thinking of using a ferrite tube for the centre coil and 5 ferrite rods for outside.  If I don't post anything in the next month or so, it means I've been sucked down the black hole gumpy warned about :0)

Any comments/ideas/suggestions?
B

@Bob Smith

The main difference with the Hubbard coil is they are not side by side so such a scheme of having like poles next to each would not be effective.

Not necessarily.  The effect is perpendicular to the wire of the coil - for a multilayer solenoid the effect is to the sides as well as the top and bottom.   I'd leave out the ferrite.

My explanation with the opposed coils was a spin-off from the Hubbard explanation.

I just came across these original British Intelligence documents on the Hans Coler invention, dating back to WWII.

http://www.tesla-coil.com/Hans%20Coler.htm

I read all the pages in detail, and it is so apparent that the phenomena is none other then the TPU phenomena, and also, none other then the McFarland Cook coil, and none other then the Hubbard coil.

In other words, it's the same phenomena that's not understood by physics and it produces pulsed DC currents and extra energy.

In the case of the Hans Coler device, they found out there was a 180 kHz frequency.

Simply amazing, and note he uses the conducting magnets in his circuits as current conductors as well, which simply is the same as the IRON (BAILING) wire COLLECTOR that SM used in his TPU.  In other wores, the wire is not only MAGNETIC and used as the core for the helical (or toroidal) coil, but also carries current as well.  This can plainly be seen in the FTPU, and in the Hans Coler drawings.

In one of the pdfs, Hans Coler says he believes there are natural oscillations in the magnetic circuit (flux path) and these fluctuations induce current in the electrical circuit which is tuned.    Same stuff like SM, but slightly different geometry.

I can say that my brainstorming on the nature of the Hubbard coil might be very close to the truth.  Energy will discharge from one coil to the other in a PULSED manner, like I already described in previous posts.   Somehow energy is amplified,  and note the very exciting experiment conducted by Hans Coler  (page 31) where they connect and disconnect a transformer with a diode and resistor in the secondary circuit,  and they obtain an INCREASE of energy when the current BEGINS TO FLOW, as opposed to when it's interrupted.

Wow, and more wows!!!   Even SM talked about this.

Has anybody replicated any of this Hans Coler stuff? 

This is dynamite info guys,  we have accurate descriptions of the device and test results, and I'm convinced we'll harness this elusive energy before too long.  I can't believe I'm only now discovering this.

EM

i have a verry good file regarding this device altho it is not my work and i would be going aginst my friends wishes if i were to post  as he wrote the article i have ...

bar magnets ..... sure does look like a tpu...

ist

Ist   if its an 'article' that sounds like something that has already been published ? if its a PM of course thats different   maybe you could ask him if its all right to share his article here ? I agree with EM also   the time is getting close [seems like he really has his teeth into this] Chet PS along with others

that atempt is built wrong.....


ist

i will see if i can dig up some of the schems....

agin i have not built this

it flows both ways.....

i beleave rectangular bar magnets are to be used and biased both ways  also open ends.....    and they are to connect toagther as 1 ring ....  the magnetic cores..  in attraction but i could be wrong as i have not really deeply studied this device...