Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down

Author Topic: Replication of the Jan P. Cack device?  (Read 24795 times)

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Replication of the Jan P. Cack device?
« Reply #45 on: February 21, 2008, 11:58:37 PM »
Quote from: Low-Q on February 21, 2008, 11:51:56 PM
Quote from: Omnibus on February 21, 2008, 11:40:31 PM
Quote from: Low-Q on February 21, 2008, 11:31:00 PM
You are wrong @omnibus. I am more than enough qualified to discuss topics here. But this is not the topic in this thread. So if you don't have other comments than comment me and my skills, you can stop writing, but quote your words to yourself !!

Discussing me or other persons are definitly not constructive, and should on the other hand be a good reason for you to be excluded from this forum!! >:(

Vidar

You should go away and not continue to clutter the discussion with incompetent blabber.
Maybe you should take a look at your own writings first, and then come back to tell who is blabbering here. Sadly there is no moderators on this forum to exclude such behaviours of yours. Grow up!

Vidar

Moderators should take care of the likes of you, impudently imposing their own confusion on others.
Logged

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: Replication of the Jan P. Cack device?
« Reply #46 on: February 22, 2008, 12:10:33 AM »
Quote from: Omnibus on February 21, 2008, 11:58:37 PM
Quote from: Low-Q on February 21, 2008, 11:51:56 PM
Quote from: Omnibus on February 21, 2008, 11:40:31 PM
Quote from: Low-Q on February 21, 2008, 11:31:00 PM
You are wrong @omnibus. I am more than enough qualified to discuss topics here. But this is not the topic in this thread. So if you don't have other comments than comment me and my skills, you can stop writing, but quote your words to yourself !!

Discussing me or other persons are definitly not constructive, and should on the other hand be a good reason for you to be excluded from this forum!! >:(

Vidar

You should go away and not continue to clutter the discussion with incompetent blabber.
Maybe you should take a look at your own writings first, and then come back to tell who is blabbering here. Sadly there is no moderators on this forum to exclude such behaviours of yours. Grow up!

Vidar

Moderators should take care of the likes of you, impudently imposing their own confusion on others.
Grow up, and learn common mannerliness before you continue. ;)
Logged

supersam

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
Re: Replication of the Jan P. Cack device?
« Reply #47 on: February 22, 2008, 04:39:44 AM »
vidar,

before you continue, have you not heard, cop has already been proven to be wrong.  just ask omni.
smot has already proven it.  don't you understand yet.

lol
sam
Logged

Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Replication of the Jan P. Cack device?
« Reply #48 on: February 22, 2008, 04:45:36 AM »
Quote from: supersam on February 22, 2008, 04:39:44 AM
vidar,

before you continue, have you not heard, cop has already been proven to be wrong.  just ask omni.
smot has already proven it.  don't you understand yet.

lol
sam


So, what do you prove with this little nothing you've written?
Logged

ThothTheSecond

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: Replication of the Jan P. Cack device?
« Reply #49 on: July 03, 2008, 02:37:39 AM »
I'm relatively new to this stuff, so please forgive my ignorance, but what if there was an angle to the central magnets ?
Logged

ThothTheSecond

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 75
Re: Replication of the Jan P. Cack device?
« Reply #50 on: July 03, 2008, 02:38:18 AM »
all the way around of course.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
« previous next »