GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 82560
  • *Latest: Fatdo13

  • *Total Posts: 498469
  • *Total Topics: 14764
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 3
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 15

Author Topic: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device  (Read 160835 times)

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #90 on: March 16, 2014, 03:46:50 AM »
Dear dieter and famhand,

Back emf = counter emf = result of input and is definitely no free.

Think of damped waves oscillations instead of supplying the primary with a resonant (undamped wave oscillation). Damped wave oscillation gives huge explosive bursts of energy in milli/ micro/ nano seconds.

(Primary self resonance must = all secondary self resonance, for min energy consumtion or highest efficiency)

This momentary discharge by caps gives huge spikes of emf and back emf. Theses spikes of back emf are a result of energy supplied by us and are not free.

These huge spikes of back emf are successive to forward emf in every cycle.

Now here comes the exploitation of back emf : (I am theorising now, which needs validation)

Secondary 1 : Has a circuit at the output to capture almost full forward emf and feeds to a dc capacitor. The circuit is such that it doesnt capture back emf.
Secondary 2 : Has a circuit at the output to capture almost full reverse emf and feeds to another dc capacitor.this circuit is such that it doesnt capture forward emf.

In real time, first the forward emf is generated and captured almost say 95% with system losses and fed to cap.

Now the wave collapses and till its zero our cap is filled with energy of the forward wave. When the wave is collapsing forward emf dampens but simutaneously reverse emf wave amplitude increases.

Now comes the second pickup coil in picture. Second pick up coil captures only this counter emf, courtesy to the circuit connected to it and now feeds a second capacitor say with 5% system losses.


Now you have 2 caps filled up each with 95% of the inititially supplied energy say E, after the end of one cycle of emf and back emf in each completed oscillation of your damped wave oscillation.

As a result if you supplied 1 joule for creating one damped wave oscillation, you are in effect capturing 95% + 95 % by the end of one cycle. That equals 190 % total.

So input was 1 joule for each cycle but the output is 1.9 joule for each cycle.

Its upto us now how to design our output circuits of each secondary and how to design and place our primary and secondary to exploit this to our benefit.

It seems simple to think and understand to me but maybe I forgot to consider something, which may be added by you to develop on this theory or dump this theory.

This theory doesnt voilate laws of thermodynamics and there is no exotic aether involved either.

Best,






Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #90 on: March 16, 2014, 03:46:50 AM »

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #91 on: March 16, 2014, 04:09:29 AM »
I forgot to mention that our input is pulsing DC only.

Best,

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #92 on: March 16, 2014, 06:44:11 AM »
In the attached art Tesla probably very elusively describes turning back emf in "displacement current".

Will it lead to overunity ???  :-\ :-\ :-\

Comments please.

Best,

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #92 on: March 16, 2014, 06:44:11 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3698
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #93 on: March 16, 2014, 09:36:04 AM »
I believe so.  :-\  If only somebody could explain me why Lenz law is harshing the resonance in transformer setup when primary is joined to capacitor to form tank circuit. Yes, I know that the load on secondary change mutual inductance of core, but it ONLY an EXCUSE - we don't understand it step by step and that's the REAL difference between us and the real inventors.
Judging on the patents amount there is a way to eliminating Lenz law from the device.

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #94 on: March 16, 2014, 09:54:46 AM »
I believe so.  :-\  If only somebody could explain me why Lenz law is harshing the resonance in transformer setup when primary is joined to capacitor to form tank circuit. Yes, I know that the load on secondary change mutual inductance of core, but it ONLY an EXCUSE - we don't understand it step by step and that's the REAL difference between us and the real inventors.
Judging on the patents amount there is a way to eliminating Lenz law from the device.

You got me wrong, I want to use Lenz Law to be put to useful work. I want to add work done by my initial pulse and Lenz Law to combine and gimme higher output than input.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #94 on: March 16, 2014, 09:54:46 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Jeg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1193
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #95 on: March 16, 2014, 10:01:24 AM »
Dear Forest
I also have the same question and i have read many opinions on this. I started to believe that the real resonance is not what we have been taught in school. At least not the OU or Lenzless resonance. For me, real resonance occurs when the resonant frequency has a harmonic that matches with the length of the wire so to make it oscillate at it's own frequency. If that happens to both primary and secondary, then we talk about Lenz law bending. To take an idea take a look at my latest approach in Radu Morisan oscillator circuit here...   

http://www.overunity.com/14197/sstc-changing-frequency-issue/15/

If this wire length/frequency relation is the same to both primary and secondary, the oscillation is constructive and not destructive which is the case in Lenz law.

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #96 on: March 16, 2014, 10:25:15 AM »
Resonance between L1 and L2 can take place at Wavelegth, 1/2 Wavelength and 1/4 Wavelength.

For best loss less resonant effect keep frequency a bit low. About 25Khz.

Keep self inductance very high compared to capacitance of the L1 and L2 both. Your radiating losses shall be minimised to 5% if you follow the above.

Think think.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #96 on: March 16, 2014, 10:25:15 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline DilJalaay

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #97 on: March 16, 2014, 10:46:42 AM »
DonSmith Chines replication, by Mr.Tang.




Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #98 on: March 16, 2014, 01:09:20 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline energia9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 380
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #99 on: March 16, 2014, 01:23:52 PM »
DON SMITH WAS NOT A FAKE
;D ;D ;D

here is the proof :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MbtkAm5_J0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BsQxIoiwzg
http://youtu.be/4tHMtfbLBYQ
this is just half wave or full wave rectification,   this in it self does not prove he was not a fake, this is not free energy, 
if you dont understand ,  put a tin foil on a neon lamp or just an energy saving lamp, and connect a half or full wave rectifier and a caoacitor to the output and watch the voltage rise in the capacitor.

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #100 on: March 16, 2014, 02:11:46 PM »
this is just half wave or full wave rectification,   this in it self does not prove he was not a fake, this is not free energy, 
if you dont understand ,  put a tin foil on a neon lamp or just an energy saving lamp, and connect a half or full wave rectifier and a caoacitor to the output and watch the voltage rise in the capacitor.

Replication of one of his experiments does raise some hope. How much power that youtube plasma tube might be using afterall. It shows charging a cap by induction. And electrostatic systems have a COP of 2 minus system losses.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #100 on: March 16, 2014, 02:11:46 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3698
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #101 on: March 16, 2014, 02:13:06 PM »
Right, but where to buy such plasma tube ?

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #102 on: March 16, 2014, 02:17:21 PM »
Alibaba.com and 40 thieves  ;D ;D

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568

Offline Google

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
Re: I tried to rebiuld a Don Smith Device
« Reply #104 on: March 16, 2014, 03:26:01 PM »

 

OneLink