Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: fully baked innovation  (Read 26495 times)

ring_theory

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
    • Ring_theory home page
fully baked innovation
« on: September 24, 2005, 01:31:06 PM »
removed by poster
« Last Edit: August 06, 2007, 03:21:37 PM by ring_theory »

BattyCoda

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2006, 06:32:30 AM »
Dood! before you try and patent that idea i suggest you look up the work done by John H.R. Searl and his magnetic motor...or email and i`ll sent the file :/

Elvis Oswald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
    • ONI
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2006, 02:02:29 PM »
Have you built a prototype?  Can you show us a video?

ring_theory

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
    • Ring_theory home page
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2006, 04:19:31 AM »
Removed by poster
« Last Edit: August 06, 2007, 03:22:47 PM by ring_theory »

alan2here

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #4 on: November 04, 2006, 12:48:24 PM »
Could you post a simple explonation of how and possibly why this actually works?

ring_theory

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
    • Ring_theory home page
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2006, 02:26:25 PM »
removed by poster
« Last Edit: August 06, 2007, 03:24:02 PM by ring_theory »

alan2here

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2006, 07:15:02 PM »
That you'r Idea of simple?

All I can see so far is a ring of magnets, in a circle and a drawing

The only slightly odd thing I can see is that one pole of the ring apears to go clockwise and the other anticlockwise, or it just acts like a whole lot of single magnets. whats that drawing of?

ring_theory

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
    • Ring_theory home page
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2006, 05:05:41 AM »
removed by poster
« Last Edit: August 06, 2007, 03:25:12 PM by ring_theory »

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2006, 06:52:35 AM »
Well before you post photos of your prototype we would be more interested in the Input to Ouput ratios.

ring_theory

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
    • Ring_theory home page
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2006, 03:48:17 PM »
removed by poster
« Last Edit: August 06, 2007, 03:26:01 PM by ring_theory »

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2006, 10:03:51 PM »
Well before you post photos of your prototype we would be more interested in the Input to Ouput ratios.

Input and output are FULLY multifarious. Depending on every aspect of the mechanism. number of poles, desired output voltage, mass of armature, desired operating rpm's, Wire guage, number of windings, desired coil length inner and outer radius, etc.

Ok, I'll be more dirrect: What is the CoP on your prototype?

For instance operating input voltage could be as low as milivolts DC with giga volts AC output in the same mechanism.

Well unfotunately that means very little to me without knowing the over all wattage... Voltage means nothing without high current in the energy market. Just about anyone can invert 12 volts dc to ac then step up the voltage to a giggavolt.

Please be more clear with your data...

~Dingus

P.S. I do hope you've invented a overunity device that you plan on sharing with us here at overunity.com, but currently you're off to a bad start: overzelous claims, no prototype, vague and incomplete data. Just my opinion, but this is starting to smell less baked then the thread name would imply...

ring_theory

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
    • Ring_theory home page
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2006, 08:58:02 AM »
removed by poster
« Last Edit: August 06, 2007, 03:27:17 PM by ring_theory »

Dingus Mungus

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 859
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #12 on: November 11, 2006, 11:10:40 AM »
CoP == How efficient is your prototype? CoP means how much energy do you put in and how much energy do you get out. If for example you put 1 watt in and get out 1 watt your CoP = 1.0, and if you put 1 watt in and get 2 watts out your CoP = 2.0, AKA overunity.

I am sorry if our questions seem brash, but you must understand this concept is no where near 'fully baked' as you put it. I would recomend you continue building you prototype and get back to us with some data, then we can help you figure out the numbers. It would appear you have the ring that will generate the torque built and all you need is a large cylinder for it to turn on. A large radius section of pvc would work fine, now you would just have to start working on the stators operation.

Get back to us with more info when this project is indeed baked. If you have questions in the mean time then we can help in some cases, but we dont work well with claims without proof.

Good luck to you sir,
~Dingus

ring_theory

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
    • Ring_theory home page
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #13 on: November 12, 2006, 12:44:49 AM »
removed by poster
« Last Edit: August 06, 2007, 03:28:00 PM by ring_theory »

ring_theory

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 311
    • Ring_theory home page
Re: fully baked innovation
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2006, 01:50:12 AM »
removed by poster
« Last Edit: August 06, 2007, 03:28:50 PM by ring_theory »