Hi guys,
          check this out before you commit to the Lutec Flux density!

       http://www.ratbags.com/rsoles/comment/lutec.htm

Regards

Why don?t you visit Lutec and have yourself a look at it ?

I have. I might be new to the discussions on this forum, but, that does not preclude me from noting the manner with which these guys respond to information requests.  Also, the link does supply valid concerns. IMHO, you have quite rightly expressed some support for the LUTEC system. I have my reservations.

I am mindful of all the claims made with "Large" overunity claims - not that I do not wish to believe them, indeed, I am still naive enough to think that some of the promises made are achievable. Claims contested  such as with the Perendev Motor:-
http://www.freeenergynews.com/Directory/Perendev/MagneticMotor/KeithAnderson_statement/index.html

Indeed, as a starting point, one of the whole issues with magnetic motor energy, IMHO, is related to demagnetisation due to constant repulsion.

I thankyou for your reply and regards to you

.....Indeed, as a starting point, one of the whole issues with magnetic motor energy, IMHO, is related to demagnetisation due to constant repulsion.

I thankyou for your reply and regards to you

Is this not another of those "urban legends" - I recall reading ages ago on this forum that one well-respected member had been testing this conjecture for more than 6 months (at least twice that now, if he continued the testing) and had found no deterioration whatsoever in field strength.  Moreover, during my own meagre research (ages ago) I found that in order to permanently demagnetise a neo magnet, a magnetic field strength - called the 'intrinsic coercive field' (iHc) - must be reached.  This is far higher than the 'normal' coercive field (Hc) - the field strength needed to just nullify a magnets field strength.  Therefore, if similar sized magnets are used in a system, no degradation of field strength should occur - at least in my mind!  And until such time as I find a reliable source that suggests otherwise, I will continue to believe it is just more dis-information - "Mythbusters"  are obviously excluded!  

Reading that sceptic's article in the PDF, i don't blame Christie for calling the guy a donkey

Here is the main problem with over-unity skeptics: They do not have any, not a shread, of proof one way or the other, yet they will run on the "certainty" that it is phoney. That is their "job" so to speak, and they go out of their way to use all the derogitory and emotionally-loaded words like "perpetual motion".... Taking about Dennis Lee or others in the same sentance, as if it is proven that Christie is one of them... Lol, even talking about poor widows and ophans losing their savings to charlitans. All without a lick of proof.  This shows exactly where their head is at. They will be bound and determined, one way or the other, to discredit the invention.... If not by science then by pysc-ops.

In fact, it is their only weapon when they don't have any evidence to disprove it scientifically... Talk about it with derision, laugh at the kooks, and hope people don't notice that they have absolutely nothing to base their opinion on.

Let them put up money for an independant University laboratory to do the study instead: And shut-up with the derogitory comments until the results are in  

But there are no University studies being done on these devices (openly anyway, there's evidence that the military is doing them) .......

International investors and venture capitalists, people not known to throw away their money... will back it the devices with millions. But it is too "kooky" for the Universities to even consider studying them?

It seems the only ones in the mainstream wanting to invest time into this are the paid skeptics.... So they can try to debunk it. Who's paying them, i wonder?

Reading that sceptic's article in the PDF, i don't blame Christie for calling the guy a donkey

Here is the main problem with over-unity skeptics: They do not have any, not a shread, of proof one way or the other, yet they will run on the "certainty" that it is phoney. That is their "job" so to speak, and they go out of their way to use all the derogitory and emotionally-loaded words like "perpetual motion".... Taking about Dennis Lee or others in the same sentance, as if it is proven that Christie is one of them... Lol, even talking about poor widows and ophans losing their savings to charlitans. All without a lick of proof.  This shows exactly where their head is at. They will be bound and determined, one way or the other, to discredit the invention.... If not by science then by pysc-ops.

In fact, it is their only weapon when they don't have any evidence to disprove it scientifically... Talk about it with derision, laugh at the kooks, and hope people don't notice that they have absolutely nothing to base their opinion on.

Let them put up money for an independant University laboratory to do the study instead: And shut-up with the derogitory comments until the results are in  

But there are no University studies being done on these devices (openly anyway, there's evidence that the military is doing them) .......

International investors and venture capitalists, people not known to throw away their money... will back it the devices with millions. But it is too "kooky" for the Universities to even consider studying them?

It seems the only ones in the mainstream wanting to invest time into this are the paid skeptics.... So they can try to debunk it. Who's paying them, i wonder?

Don't rag on the skeptics too hard - so far they are correct about overunity.  Not a single device has been shown to be such.  And it is not quite right to say that there is not a shred of evidence.  The evidence is the known body of scientific knowledge which can be applied to an  unknown device.  The skeptic may not know exactly how the said black-box device operates, but based on current scientific knowledge, the skeptic can say that the black box cannot continue to spit out more energy than came in.

For example, if someone claimed to have a free-standing machine that could continually eject two quarters for every quarter inserted, a person would not be out of line to be skeptical of the device.  There would be nothing wrong at all in pressing the proponent of the device for more detail or for a controlled demonstration, especially if the said proponent (like Lutec, here) continued to carry a website offering investment opportunity in said magic quarter multiplier.

They would go in parallel, not series.  (Resistors add in series, capacitors add in parallel.)

Thank you. I'm new here and really appreciate finding like minds and growing in a society of ingenuity.