Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?  (Read 366430 times)

b0rg13

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #60 on: May 27, 2008, 10:54:07 PM »
hello Otto, im curious about your working 4" tpu,...do you need to place a magnet or two on it like SM does?, or is that simply a show of distraction ?, some people are sugesting that it runs on a small battery hidden some where, does yours need a battery or is it self running ?, have been able to run a light bulb for longer than 30mins ?, does it get hot ?,

..sorry for all the questions, but to me this is what i cant find the answers too, and i dont have a working tpu to test out.
..thanks in advance.

b0rg13

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #61 on: May 27, 2008, 10:59:39 PM »
Hello all,

@borg

there is a little problem with building TPUs:

the bigger the diameter of a TPU the more complicated to build it.

It was really a joke to build my 4" TPU but a 6" or even a 15" TPU is really a F....G job.

If I could buy cores that are 6" in diameter, Im sure that I would have a working unit in a short time because I know what and how.

I have at home a big motor. A working one. Hmmmm......to see the cores. Are there cores inside?? I never thought about it.

I would love to have cores that are 1/2" in height and 6" in diameter. That would be great. I have to google it. Maybe.....

As you all can see - Im a dreamer!!

Otto

PS: the more turns, the more voltage on my scope - the more on the output. BUT, not to much windings because then you have nothing on the output!!!

to Otto , or any one else, can post a pic or two of what a core is and where they might come from ?, sorry for asking a dumb question but i want to learn.( what are they actually supposed to do ?).

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #62 on: May 28, 2008, 12:05:43 AM »
Hello all,


I sent also my schematic of the 4" TPU to Earl and Gustav22 but .....nothing

Otto

Hi Otto,

It seems your schematics is top secret otherwise it would be uploaded >:( ???

Why cannot we see it since yesterday afternoon?

Would you mind uploading it here: http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=upload

Thanks,
Gyula


otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #63 on: May 28, 2008, 08:41:56 AM »
Hello all,

@wattsup

I was thinking in the same direction. I will try it.

@brog13

no magnets, no self runner. In this forum are much better guys with electronics then Im. I hope somebody will jump out with a solution. I remember there was ....hmmmm....

Really no problem with your questions!!!

I have my cores from TVs. That are deflection coils and I have removed only the coils with the cores, removed the original windings and formed a 4" circle with this cores. Then I made a collector coil with lamp wire INSIDE the core in the horizontal direction. After that in horizontal direction I have wound 12 + 12 turns as the controls. Made also with lamp wire because every strand of such an wire has a lot of fine wires inside each strand.
Now the people think a speaker wire with much more fine wires inside each strand would be better. YES, its better but for now I cant buy such a cable because I have no car and so I cant ......my problem.

@gyulasum

THE PICTURE IS IN THE DOWNLOAD SECTION, TITLE 4 INCH TPU.

Otto

PS: I have sent my schematic of the 4" TPU to some people but at least from 1 of them I got the message that he didnt get my email with the schematic attached and I didnt get the information that my emali was NOT delivered.

Otto



otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #64 on: May 28, 2008, 10:20:24 AM »
Hello all,

@Loner

Im using  2 oscillators connected to 2 MOSFETs. This is my mixing.

Forget the iron wire!! At least for now.

As Im on vacation, Im all the days working on various designs for a 4" TPU surching for anomalies as I did in the last 2 ?? years and today I found something but I have to look deeper.

Just a short one: all the time I have a feeling that in a TPU is not only working copper. There is more inside.
Later. Im on my workbench.

Otto

PS: nothing to hide - everything to share.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #65 on: May 28, 2008, 12:15:07 PM »
Hello all,

today Im playing with oridinary SOLDERING WIRE as a control coil. The soldering wire that ecectronic guys are using.

Not bad, 640V on my bulb.
I have 19 or 20 turns as a control coil but only on half of my TPU. The other half of my TPU is on "vacation".

Forgot to say: diameter of this soldering wire is 1mm. In the same manner I wound a copper wire, diameter 0,7mm around my 1/2 TPU, or better, around 1 core, the SAME core.

As the core is NOT isolated I would expect a short between the iron powder core and the soldering wire but NO SHORT!!!
As the soldering wire has a bigger resistance then the copper wire I would expect a much higher current from the power supply but NO!!! The current is less then with copper. Now somebody would say because of the diameters. OK. Then let us say the current from the power supply is the same. But whats about the resistance? Wouldnt it be logic that the soldering wire because of the resistance would "need" a much higher current?
There is 1 more: with a copper or soldering wire collector Im always measuring 640V.

And there is more:

my TPU is heating. Yes, Eddy currents but why is my core that is in no way "connected" to the collector also heating up?? I mean, I have a little distance between the collector and the iron core.

I had to shut off my TPU after 15 - 20 minutes because the soldering wire controld would melt.

My next try was to connect my TPU in an idiotic way using copper wires as collectors. Copper wires because in the next run I forgot to let cool my TPU and the soldering wire controls melted.

End result:

With only 1/2 of my TPU I have the same great results as yesterday with the complete TPU!!! Not bad!!

Otto

PS: is it time to blow a 100W bulb??


b0rg13

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #66 on: May 28, 2008, 12:36:26 PM »
Hello all,

today Im playing with oridinary SOLDERING WIRE as a control coil. The soldering wire that ecectronic guys are using.

Not bad, 640V on my bulb.
I have 19 or 20 turns as a control coil but only on half of my TPU. The other half of my TPU is on "vacation".

Forgot to say: diameter of this soldering wire is 1mm. In the same manner I wound a copper wire, diameter 0,7mm around my 1/2 TPU, or better, around 1 core, the SAME core.

As the core is NOT isolated I would expect a short between the iron powder core and the soldering wire but NO SHORT!!!
As the soldering wire has a bigger resistance then the copper wire I would expect a much higher current from the power supply but NO!!! The current is less then with copper. Now somebody would say because of the diameters. OK. Then let us say the current from the power supply is the same. But whats about the resistance? Wouldnt it be logic that the soldering wire because of the resistance would "need" a much higher current?
There is 1 more: with a copper or soldering wire collector Im always measuring 640V.

And there is more:

my TPU is heating. Yes, Eddy currents but why is my core that is in no way "connected" to the collector also heating up?? I mean, I have a little distance between the collector and the iron core.

I had to shut off my TPU after 15 - 20 minutes because the soldering wire controld would melt.

My next try was to connect my TPU in an idiotic way using copper wires as collectors. Copper wires because in the next run I forgot to let cool my TPU and the soldering wire controls melted.

End result:

With only 1/2 of my TPU I have the same great results as yesterday with the complete TPU!!! Not bad!!

Otto

PS: is it time to blow a 100W bulb??



shisser this is better than watching batman!.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #67 on: May 28, 2008, 02:14:56 PM »
Hello all,

@borg13

this IS the reason Im building TPUs, test them, build new, again test them,.....

Almost every new TPU is better then the last one.

I can easily say that I saw signals that never have been seen on this planet......

In short, I have a lot of fun.

Otto

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #68 on: May 28, 2008, 02:48:45 PM »
@b0rg13

Nothing is better then watching Batman. Well yeh there is. Catwoman. Much better. lol

@otto

Don't forget to try and cut the collector and re-splice it under the same conditions. I am now curious to know if you drive the same setup but just wind the collector and control coil on a 4" high rounded piece of carton, will it work the same way. The question is, is the yoke absolutely essential to these results as the coupling medium between the two winds.

Thanks you very much for your work because it is showing vertical control coil pulses will move current in the horizontal collector. I think there are many Forum threads that are converging.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #69 on: May 28, 2008, 04:25:14 PM »
Hello all,

@wattsup

finally I can answer you but dont wonder what Im wrighting.

Without the core is nothing!! I didnt try it but I know it. How??

This morning I wound control coils - "bifilar" - 1 with soldering wire and 1 with copper wire 19 turns each, on 1 of my cores.
After I forgot to shut down my 1/2 TPU the soldering wire melted. Over 1" disapeared.
I didnt notice this because I didnt know it!!

An hour ago I wanted to remove this soldering wire and disconnected it. No kicks anymore on my TPU. Again I connected this piece of soldering wire to my 1 end of the collector and pulsed again my TPU. Fine, nice kicks and an incredible light.
Then I wanted to remove a little piece of this molten soldering wire where the + connection was. Just a few inch long. Again, no kicks, no light.

Whats going on??? How can I have kicks, a light .....with such a wire??

The "secret" is in the core. The core has now the function of my molten soldering wire!!! This core is "filling up" the 1" molten part of my control coil.

How I know? Easy. Build a control coil without a core and then cut this coil. End result: a big nothing!! No kicks no.....of course not because nothing can "melt" together such a cutted wire.

I think its enough from me today. Heeeey, Im on vacation.

Otto

tishatang

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 296
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #70 on: May 28, 2008, 05:37:50 PM »
Hi Otto and All,

I posted this on another thread, but thought I would post it here as well.  Rotation can be induced by half wave rectified AC  causing a "Lorentz O"  (Tornado) force.
Follow this link and maybe this is what is causing rotation in the TPU?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=cSEtx5C2pkQ

Good luck to all,
Tishatang


altium

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #71 on: May 28, 2008, 11:46:10 PM »
Hello, Otto. Nice results and conslusions.
Maybe, melted solderihg wire has function of piece of collector?
Do you make test with collector from soldering wire, or classical soft iron magnetic core plates, or lead? Do you have electrical connect with melted piece of wire and copper collector?
Can you share pic of melted piece of soldering wire, please?
Thanks.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #72 on: May 29, 2008, 08:28:26 AM »
Hello all,

@altium

I see youre a clever guy!! I mean it. I saw yesterday that the melted soldering wire was working because of the collector and NOT of the iron core. I saw it but it was to late to post it.

I made tests with soldering wire as a control coil. Yes, I remember that I made tests with soldering wires as a collector. This you can read in the ECD pdf.

No pics, because this was yesterday and that are "old" results. Today is a new TPU day and I already rewound my TPU and I have new results. Muuuuch better results.
Yes, my claim was that I have it. This claim is OK but now Im so crazy that I want to blow a 100W bulb!!!
A year ago I was happy to have a light glowing and now I want to blow a bulb!! Hmmmm....how things are changing!!

For now, dont expect a schematic from me because the setup changes every few minutes and its impossible to make a drawing.

Otto

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #73 on: May 29, 2008, 11:16:55 AM »
Hello all,

I have a new setup in the download section.

Otto

MACEDONIA CD

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #74 on: May 29, 2008, 02:43:02 PM »
hi friend   you  made some    PLEASE  SAY ABOUT   INPUT ENERGY   AND OUT ENERGY
WHAT S THE DIFERENT
THANKS