Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?  (Read 350745 times)

Offline MACEDONIA CD

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #90 on: May 31, 2008, 01:41:33 AM »
hi  @ all

FINALY  I HAVE    SEE   ATHERE  MAN HERE  IS  THINKG LIKE ME   AND  I HAVE  MADE THAT

THE FINALY RESOLTING TPU MAST BE   CRETED  LIKE  MY TEST  <,IMSURE >
WHIT   INCREASE  THE  MORE KICK>IMAGEN IF YOU HAVE   JUST ONE  HZ   AND  YOU  THEN   INCREASE  THE   HZ   WHITOUT ENY   EELKTRONICS PARTS 
THE REAL POINT I LIKE TO  SAY IS   THIS  <<I HAVE READ  LONG TIME   THE POST  WHIT  S.M WHIT MANNIX <<<  if you have    smalll magnet    and  move fast to some coil  and that is that   

BUT  NOT   IS ALL  OF ONLY THE SPEED  YOU  HAVE MOVE  THAT MAGNET  TO COIL   
IS WHERE IMPORTANT HOW MANY TIMES  WHIT THAT SPEED   YOU  WHILL MOVE   THAT MAGNET  IN  ONE  DIRECTION  <<THAT IS THE KICK >>

IF I HAVE  1000 KICK  JUST  WHIT ONE  HZ. INPUT    AND  THAT 1000  KICK  BE LIKE   1000 SPIN ROTATIONIN ONE DIRECTION  JUST  IN  ONE SECOND 

THE FINALY RESOLTING  WHILL BE  SMALL MAGNET   IS SPIN 1000 TIME   IN THE ONE DIRECTION IN ONE SECOND  AND THIS WHILL PRODUCED   DC VOLTAGE    IN THE OUT COIL
LIKE YOU HAVE  <DINAMO GENERATOR  >.HO IS MOVING ONE POLE  OF THE  MAGNET IN  ONE WAY DIRECTION

I HAVE PROVE MY TEST WHIT  MAGNET   WHIT TOROID  AND I  HAVE INCREASE THE   KICK WHIT OUT ENY  KIND OF ELKTRONICS 
WE MAST BE SEE LIKE THIS   WE MAST MADE DINAMO  HO WHILL   SPIN   100000  TIMES  IN ONE SECOND   
AND THEN  WE BE  SPIN  VORTEX INSAD 
AND ATHER  IF  WE   BE LIKE TO MAKE THIS    VORTEX   WE MAST  CUT  THE    INDUCTION  OF  THE COILS THAT  INDUCTION  WHILL BE   MADE TO STOP SPINING    THE FILD
IF  IS NOT POSIBLE   BUT IS POSIBLE  TO    MINIMASE  THE   INDUCTION  OF THE COIL
AND   IF I  DONT WHANT THE INDUCTIO   MY COIL  MAST BE  MADE  WHIT OUT CORE   
AND THEN I WHILL HAVE   CLEAR PULSING OR  SINS FREKFENCY TO MY ROTATION COIL

Offline MACEDONIA CD

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #91 on: May 31, 2008, 01:50:50 AM »
@ BORG
here is my  video  and   zip file   pics of mesuring
                                                 
                                 www.mediafire.com/?2npmizsfxzb
     
 this a showing   how to increase the kick or hz  whit  small magnets   whit  not  increase the input   energy THERE YOUY WHILL SEE THE RESONANCE  CAP  IN THE INPUT  COIL
MAGNETS  IS REAL  THING  WHIT MAGNETS  I HAVE INCREASE THE  KICK  <,NOT WHIT THE RESONANCE CAP  ONLY MAGNTES  IS  INCREASE THE KICK 
 :)

Offline MACEDONIA CD

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388

Offline b0rg13

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #93 on: May 31, 2008, 02:15:12 AM »
@ BORG
here is my  video  and   zip file   pics of mesuring
                                                 
                                 www.mediafire.com/?2npmizsfxzb
     
 this a showing   how to increase the kick or hz  whit  small magnets   whit  not  increase the input   energy THERE YOUY WHILL SEE THE RESONANCE  CAP  IN THE INPUT  COIL
MAGNETS  IS REAL  THING  WHIT MAGNETS  I HAVE INCREASE THE  KICK  <,NOT WHIT THE RESONANCE CAP  ONLY MAGNTES  IS  INCREASE THE KICK 
 :)

VERY interesting video MAC , looks like magnets DO make some kind of difference !.

Offline Gustav22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 181
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #94 on: May 31, 2008, 06:01:14 AM »
@pauldude000
.....
I do have one question, you may have already answered it, but I missed it somewhere if you did.

On the "full TPU" schematic, I see the positive 24V supply connection, but where is the negative?....
ca. 8 postings above yours:

@Paul

....... I dont have a minus connection in my TPU and I never had one. Im measuring less then 3A with my analog meter connected between the PS and my TPU. Maybe Im wrong but I think that the MOSFETs would overheat if there would be a larger current. I dont have big heatsinks for my MOSFETs.
My power supply is NOT current limited. Im using my home made PS because my profi made PS is still waiting to be fixed. No time for that.

Otto

Dr Stiffler is creating a current in an Avramenko plug. An AV-plug has no minus either.
An AV- plug is a circular arrangement in which Dr Stiffler creates a current by squeezing this circular hose.

Normally it is considered bad behavior to squeeze Hosen. Especially when it comes to Unterhosen.
SM knew.

Offline tosky

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #95 on: May 31, 2008, 07:29:09 AM »
@MAC
"
this a showing   how to increase the kick or hz  whit  small magnets   whit  not  increase the input   energy THERE YOUY WHILL SEE THE RESONANCE  CAP  IN THE INPUT  COIL
MAGNETS  IS REAL  THING  WHIT MAGNETS  I HAVE INCREASE THE  KICK  <,NOT WHIT THE RESONANCE CAP  ONLY MAGNTES  IS  INCREASE THE KICK "

Have you consider a possibility that input coil  consumed more energy at first due to the conditional parameters. Then you give a load is actually relief the consume of energy due to the change of the parameters? I mean it is not a linear circuit and you will increase the input current if you give it a more heavy loading. Otherwise you must success of getting Overunity.

Offline otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #96 on: May 31, 2008, 10:18:06 AM »
Hello all,

@Paul

dont be soooo hard with youself. Your posts are great!! Sometimes it happens that our little brain blocks. Hmmm... thats live.

The negative I ALWAYS connect only to the source of the MOSFETs. And thats all.

My driving circuit are my home made oscillators. Bad ones!!

I was looking to your schematic for oscillators with the 555 ICs. Now my question: Whats the output voltage of your oscillators and is the output voltage constant at all frequencies or is it dropping with higher frequencies??

My problem is that my output voltage dropps from 12 V to say, 5V with a higher frequency and so dropps also my output power on the bulb. So I have to use frequencies at areound 200kHz to get a full light. When I could use 500kHz, my bulb would need only the half? current from the power supply. Not to mention a frequency at 1MHz.

Otto




Offline tosky

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #97 on: May 31, 2008, 10:42:03 AM »
@Paul
Take it easy Paul, my little brain is blocking 99.9% too. Otherwise I got O.U already.

Offline tosky

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #98 on: May 31, 2008, 06:52:58 PM »
@Mac
"CUT  THE    INDUCTION  OF  THE COILS THAT  INDUCTION  WHILL BE   MADE TO STOP SPINING    THE FILD"

I think cutting the magnetic flux will stop the spinning in the field, this is the way of keeping energy conservation by mother nature. If you do not use any material core (only air coil).  Input pure sine or very clean energy to build up the vortex. Then collect the energy without material core.That will break the relationship between input and output. Do you need Capacitor discharge for large current in your setup? Correct me if I am wrong in understanding your theory?

Offline tosky

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #99 on: May 31, 2008, 07:33:22 PM »
@otto
Try to think your setup is a simple step up converter circuit and there are many ways to setup those converter. As long as you use your power supply and no measurement on input to output relationship plus you don't like to talk about theory. I just don't know what a difference in those your TPUs. You should know many power supplies will deliver more current or out of control due to the feedback path in those transistors or Operation-Amplifiers in the control circuit, if interfacing with high frequency or switching circuits. You may feel like getting O.U. but actually not. That is why I suggest you play with chargeable batteries (battery never out of control). You know, buy the battery will sure lost you money, but save your precious time.

Offline altium

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #100 on: May 31, 2008, 08:24:47 PM »
I think that`s a right schem :)

Offline wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #101 on: May 31, 2008, 10:07:23 PM »
@otto

You know how great my EE is but I thought I would run this by you.

The other day I was sending some sine waves into this new speaker magnet toroid that I have made (yes I call it a Magoid) to see how the Magoid reacts at certain frequencies.

Anyways I had my scope on the output of the sine wave and decided I should put a diode on the output of my audio output in case anything bad were to happen. To my surprise (but I'm sure not to your surprise), the scope no longer showed sine waves but square waves. Nice square waves. So I was thinking maybe your device could use the same type of driving method. That could do away with the negative return through the mosfet. Yes, I know I may have put my foot in my mouth once again. lol

Anyways, keep up the good work.

Offline MACEDONIA CD

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #102 on: June 01, 2008, 12:24:44 AM »
hi all
  all that  my explane  or practical ways  is showing  the theory of  some gay < spherics>  that  his theory    is   so clouse like my test    to increase the   kick      <<not important  is  the speed   >>but  is  important how many times   the elktromagnet fild  whil be  move    in one directions  to  athere  out coil   LIKE YOU HAVE   SMAL MAGNET FILD  AND MOVE    ONLY   ONE POLE OF MAGET FILD     IN ONE DIRECTION      WHIT  MORE AND MORE TIMES      IN ONE SECOND
WE  all know  that the speed of light is   the same  of  speed of elktrones   moving in coper   wire 
if  we  have that  one second of speed of light moving elktromagnet fild   in one direction  way  clouse  to athere   out coil       what   whill be  doi   and how  to  make  more   andmore    times kick  to   the exit coil ist look  like  not posible  whit  one single  hz input    whit  that  very fast  moving fild  of speed of light   <<A LIKE TO POINT  THIS  I  WE  BE   CREATE   THAT  THAT FILD  AND MAKE  CUT  THIS  SECVENCE     IN MORE PIECES   <<LIKE   YOU  CUT   THE  SPEEED  OF LIGHT   IN   1000  OR  10000   SECVENCES   IF 1 SECVENEC  PICK UP  TO CREATED   A SINGLE  ONE KICK  IN  ONE DIRECTION  WAY     TO PROUCED        DC  VOLTAGE 
IMAGEN  YOU WHILL HAVE   1000 KICK  BE   LIKE   YOU HAVE   ONE ELKTROMAGNET  HO WHIL MOVE   1000  TIMES  CLOUSE  TO OUT COIL    AND  WHILL PRODUCED    ONLY DC  VOLTAGE  THAT MOVING WHILL BE  IN THE  ONE DIRECTIO WAY   
IF BE   INCREASE  THE  MORE KICK YOU WHIL HAVE MORE OUT POWER     MORE KICK  IS  THE  KEY   
THE   FORMULA F FOR POWER  IS  HAS  TWO THINGS
<<<ONE IS  SPEEDD  ONE  IS   THE MAGNET FILD 
IF  I INCREASE   THE MAG. FILD     THEN  I  WHILL BE NEED ONLY SMALL KICK  <<LETS SAY 100>>
IF  I INCREASE THE KICK  THEN  I WHILL BE NEED   A SMALL ELKTROMAGNET FILD   THE RESOLT IS  WHILL BE THE SAME   
BUT     TO HAVE MORE OUT POWER   IS EASY   TO PUT SMALL ELKTROMAGNET FILDD  WHIT MORE  KICK   
WHIT MORE    ELKTRMAGNET  IN POWER   THEN THE EXIT ENERGY   OF OUT POWER  WHILL BE SMALL THE  IN    BEACOUSE  I PUT  MORE COURENT  TO MY  ELKTRMAGNET COIL 
IF  I INCREASE  THE  KICKK   I   WHILL NOT HAVE TO PUT MORE  IN ENERGY  TO PRODUCED KICK MORE   FOR KICK    IS NOT  HAVE   TO PUT IN ENRGY 
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm   his engls.  is  hard  to tape  to me   bbut immtraing to tape   what im   like to say   <<macedonian languege  is easy for me :D :D :D

Offline otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #103 on: June 02, 2008, 07:00:11 AM »
Hello all,

@wattsup

good job!

@Mac

I know what you mean.

@All

lets sumarise my last week

If you pulse a wire wound around an iron powder core with 2 or more frequencies you will see that the core saturates. My square waves are wide. But when as the core is more and more saturated I see the kicks getting nicer and better in the sence that they are not wide anymore. The problem is that if  the core saturates for 100%, then the current rises dramatically. So I have to detune a little bit my frequency mix to have a good light and the PS dont suffer soooo much. When the core saturates totally then the light is not good anymore and a huge current from the PS could blow my MOSFETs.

Last week I tried a lot of metals as cores and a lot of various winding techniques to get the best signals in my coils.

The best was when I wound a control coil DIRECTLY over the core and the other wire around the core and the collector. This "bifilar" wound control was the best.
I used the 1 winding over the core for the kicks. As this control was very near, to say so, the core I got big kicks and the other winding wound over the core and collector was used as a load coil. Not bad.

My next plan is to build a selfrunner but as Im working again, it will take a time....

My friend, a TV repair man, promised me a few yokes from bigger TVs so I can play with them.

Otto

Offline aether22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #104 on: June 02, 2008, 10:10:33 AM »
Otto, what would be the odds in your opinion of getting energy from a collector coil that is not connected to any source of power? (as I believe SM's wasn't)

I made an image of a few ideas, not sure how good any of them are but see what you think.

By the way are you sure you aren't simply powering the bulb from the collapsing emf of the control coil?
To check you would need to run a disassembled TPU where the control coil was not around the collector to verify it doesn't create the same effects, sorry if you have already ruled out any such possibility.