Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?  (Read 365283 times)

b0rg13

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #45 on: May 26, 2008, 08:14:07 AM »
Earl,

Im using only the iron cores from a yoke. ONLY THE IRON CORES!!!!! You can see them in the picture on the previous side. The top picture. That grey core.

2 of them to form a circle. Inside 4 or so turns of lamp wire. Over that 12 + 12 turns of lamp wire. controls and collector wound CW.

@Borg

Now I say:

Here it is and
how it works:
the collector is a mini Tesla pancake made with 4 turns of lamp wire.

As the cores have a special form - top diameter greater then the bottom diameter - the signals in the collector are travelling in an up - down direction at very high speeds.
This iron core amplifies the signals and it was a joke to get a 100W bulb to shine.

Now about the signals seen with my scope connected to 1 end of the bulb:

I was for 2 days looking to the kicks at a base time setting of 2 microsec. on my scope. Then, yesterday, I switched the time base setting to 50 microsec. and saw it:  IM ALL THE TIME WORKING WITH COMPRESSION WAVES!!!

With the 50 microsec. setting on the time base I see that the kicks have not the same distance each from the other. There are little bigger gaps - nodes - between the kicks. When I slowly change the frequency I see this gaps - nodes moving to left or right. I can easily see this.
Or, I can have an AC "carrier" wave and INSIDE this wave I have my kicks.

Of course, this carrier wave has also a "gap" - node - between the kicks and i can increase or decrease this carrier waves in the sence of time. It only depends on the 2 frequencyes mixed.

So, as a little conclusion:

With this little "thing" I made some sort of a TPU. For myself it seems that we have standing waves in the TPU. With the change of the frequency mix we move the POSITION of the standing wave. When 1 node hits the position where the bulb is connected then you have a great light.
How many nodes? I think 2 because of 2 control coils but I have to look.

As you all can see this little TPU is not only a few wires. There is a lot going on inside it. I wish I could buy much bigger cores and build a 6" TPU with them. With a bigger 2 collectors, 1 working in 1 direction the other in contra......yes, Im dreaming because here I cant buy them.

In the download section how you can build a basic one and it will work every time for any one!!! The picture with no title.

Borg I hope youre satisfied a little.

Yes, you miss all the complicated stuff that we all discussed for over 2 years. I made this TPU in only 1 hour and before that I cant remember how many TPUs I builded. I know I builded every week 1 TPU. Now imagine the number.

So, my claim is that I have a mini TPU.

Otto



... im more than satisfied Otto, and congrats to you and the othersa that have put in all this work and gotten the results, ive been reading all about this for 2 years now and it just got better each week, all tho i have to admit, i really dont know how it works and i wish i could build one on my own, i guess im going to have to ask some one to build me a small 4" version, id be happy if it would simply light one light bulb,.. i sure wish i had the understanding to build one tho,...

..Otto and the rest of you,(there are to many names to list), your all top guys in my book, and for bring it out rather than selling it and dissapearing im even more impressed.

i salute you guys,.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #46 on: May 26, 2008, 09:01:28 AM »
Hello all,

@borg
The smaler TPU in diameter - the easier to build. This is a fact.

As Im without my car, my son uses it, Im surching at home for a piece of oridinary iron strip. Maybe a few mm thickness, to form a circle with a bigger diameter then my TPU.

Yes, I know, the core that Im now using is a core made with pressed iron powder, to say so and I want s strip of iron that is made in a totally different way and has totally different properties but I cant rest. My fingers must work.

Im always thinking why my ECD was sooooo good.

If I think of such coils in a different way. I would say that the coils acted in 2 ways:

1. as coils
2. as a copper core.

The ECD coils I made only 1" long wound over the collectors. This acted as a copper coil and core. Hmmm....hard to explain.
This was copper + copper.

What would happen if I would have an iron core + iron wires wound over it??
Nickle core + Nickle wires wound around the core??

Or a little bit crazier, a combination of iron core with iron wires for 1 half of the TPU and the other half copper coil + copper core.

In the 6" unit we need 4 controls and so we also need 4 cores. 2 cores can be made of iron the other 2 of another metal.

Maybe this is needed for the 15" TPU?? A combination of metals? Magnetic or non magnetis metals?

It seems that Im wrighting more hten needed. Back to my workbench.

A time ago I made the 3 stack TPU without a core and got a fine light. If I would have the right iron cores it would without any problems light 2 100W bulbs. But I cant buy any cores here! Impossible.

Otto

PS: Im here to SHARE, not to hide.


otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #47 on: May 26, 2008, 10:08:04 AM »
Hello all,

Just a correction about the nodes in my signals:

as Im changing my frequencies just a little I see that I can have more or less nodes. It depends on the frequency mix.

I dont know how and why but when I have a good light, this means that my 2 frequencis are a little out of phase, my kicks dissapears. IM loosing my frequency mix. I mean, the frequency mix of say 200kHz multiplies into the GHz region. I have no way to measure and see this frequency with my scope.

SHIT!!! Again Im feeling bad. Since Im working an hour with pulsing my coils there is something going on with me.
Yesterday, working all the day on my TPU I felt the same and on the eavening I was totally "crashed".

Please people, be careful if somebody is replicating my little 4" TPU.

Otto


Earl

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 435
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #48 on: May 26, 2008, 02:44:48 PM »
Otto,

another try.  Is this image getting closer?
Which cut-through is more correct A, B, or C?

Earl

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #49 on: May 26, 2008, 03:35:38 PM »
Hello all,

@Earl,

my car is at home, finally. Can you give me yout email adress in a PM so I can send you a hand drawn picture and you can shrink it and post?? I will make a drawing of the connections in my TPU. You will laugh how easy made.

About the pictures:

In all 3 pictures is the direction of the ferrites wrong: big diameter of the core up, small diameter down.

Picture B is almost OK. The blue coil is almost 3/4 of the core. Maybe there was room for  a 6 turns collector or a 4 turns collector and a 2 turns collector but the 2 turns driven in contra.

Otto

PS: Im really sorry that you have soooo much trouble because Im sitting here at home blocked, only with my PC.


Earl

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 435
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #50 on: May 26, 2008, 04:48:16 PM »
Otto,

here is another image.  I think this is now close to your experiment
configuration.  Comments?

Earl

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #51 on: May 26, 2008, 05:25:40 PM »
Hello all,

@Earl,

HURAAAAAA!!!!!  thats it!!! Bottom picture is much better to see what I did. I will send you in the next hour my schematic how I connected everything.

Not to forget, 12 + 12 turns of lamp wire as the controls. On every half of my core is a 12 turns collector. You will ask why not more turns. Easy. No room for more turns!!!

This morning I posted that when I have the brightest light my scope shows me that I lost the kicks.
The point is that they are NOT lost, of course. I only have to set my scope to AC and then I can again see the kicks.

I looked a little deeper to this:

You know that I have signals on my scope of 1000V. When I hit the exact frequency mix I have to swith to AC.

At a voltage of arround 700V this dont happen any more. I dont have to swich my scope its always DC or AC.

This effect I can see only with my "iron" TPU. With copper TPUs I never saw such an effect.

The coils are warm but not hot. Hmmm.....to say it better, the thick plastic isolation is warm.

Almost forgot: I lost my vibration with this lamp wire TPU!! The vibration is very important because it increases everything.

This I learned with my 3 stack all copper TPU: when I tipped with my finger this TPU I saw increased kicks. This means that without an vibration the TPU is not so  effective.

My next plans:

maybe a stacked TPU with the cores somehow one inside the other.
maybe to have an iron collector, and lamp wires as controls.
or

hmmm, to be honest, for what??? Hmmm....because my fingers must something work.

I almost forgot: I have a lot of Magnesium at home from my experiments with hydrogen.
This pieces of Mg have a good form for a bigger TPU. No, people, dont teach me about this metal. I know its dangerous!!

My point is to try other metals as a core. Copper - non magnetic, ferite - magnetic, Mg - paramagnetic. As always, just to see.

Otto


otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #52 on: May 27, 2008, 11:56:19 AM »
Hello all,

today I wound a new TPU with 10 + 10 turns controls. What a disaster!!!

I see on my scope only 700V!

In short:

12 + 12 turns controls = 1000V
10 + 10 turns controls = 700V

Got it??

Otto

b0rg13

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 651
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #53 on: May 27, 2008, 12:19:42 PM »
Hello all,

today I wound a new TPU with 10 + 10 turns controls. What a disaster!!!

I see on my scope only 700V!

In short:

12 + 12 turns controls = 1000V
10 + 10 turns controls = 700V

Got it??

Otto

i dont think ill ever get it , but i love reading about what ya doing Otto, to me it sounds like you know how to build a real live working mini tpu, and im blown away and supprised the other tpu guys are not all over this and knocking your door down., keep it up Otto, and be safe.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #54 on: May 27, 2008, 12:41:09 PM »
Hello all,

@borg

there is a little problem with building TPUs:

the bigger the diameter of a TPU the more complicated to build it.

It was really a joke to build my 4" TPU but a 6" or even a 15" TPU is really a F....G job.

If I could buy cores that are 6" in diameter, Im sure that I would have a working unit in a short time because I know what and how.

I have at home a big motor. A working one. Hmmmm......to see the cores. Are there cores inside?? I never thought about it.

I would love to have cores that are 1/2" in height and 6" in diameter. That would be great. I have to google it. Maybe.....

As you all can see - Im a dreamer!!

Otto

PS: the more turns, the more voltage on my scope - the more on the output. BUT, not to much windings because then you have nothing on the output!!!

tosky

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #55 on: May 27, 2008, 02:44:16 PM »
@OTTO
If you got a theory, and the theory is correct. You could buy the right material core from any manufacturer to build any size you want. Even custom made the cores. Others could also do experiment base on that theory. Theory is very important, You got it?
How do we know the theory is correct? Simple, generates electricity without input power supply.

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #56 on: May 27, 2008, 03:08:26 PM »
Hello all,

@tosky

Im really not a "theory man" but look at the 3 stack picture that worked fine for me without an iron core:

top and bottom collector connected together and rotating in 1 direction and the middle ring in the contra direction.

I was asking for cores of 1/2 in height because every control coil must have his own core. In this way I could stack 3 cores with the collectors and have again the height of 1 3/4" as the original height.
The controls wound of course not with lamp wires but with oridinary copper wires.

Thats the 3 stack version.
The other version with 4 controls is different:
there should be 4 cores, again 6" in diameter and connected as Mannix posted in his picture.

Otto

nickc44

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #57 on: May 27, 2008, 03:16:37 PM »
Otto

www. mag-inc.com

800-245-3984

has 5 " OD and 3 " ID  1 " tall I have one Do I need 2 for this setup its a ring

You know I actually have 2

Draw it up for me and I will make it

Nick


Hello all,

@borg

there is a little problem with building TPUs:

the bigger the diameter of a TPU the more complicated to build it.

It was really a joke to build my 4" TPU but a 6" or even a 15" TPU is really a F....G job.

If I could buy cores that are 6" in diameter, Im sure that I would have a working unit in a short time because I know what and how.

I have at home a big motor. A working one. Hmmmm......to see the cores. Are there cores inside?? I never thought about it.

I would love to have cores that are 1/2" in height and 6" in diameter. That would be great. I have to google it. Maybe.....

As you all can see - Im a dreamer!!

Otto

PS: the more turns, the more voltage on my scope - the more on the output. BUT, not to much windings because then you have nothing on the output!!!

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #58 on: May 27, 2008, 03:49:24 PM »
Hello all,

@Nickc44

Just look at the 3 stack picture.

I dont know anymore where to send you my pictures because it seems that Im blocked somehow.

I sent also my schematic of the 4" TPU to Earl and Gustav22 but .....nothing

Otto

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Is Lindsay?s ?SM? a fraud?
« Reply #59 on: May 27, 2008, 09:41:35 PM »
@otto

If you ever have a chance can you please try something.

Make your yoke work, measure the power off the collector. Then cut the collector in half and reconnect the cut ends and test again. I need to now if the collector has to be absolutely in one uninterrupted length of wire, or if putting two in series makes no difference. This may have played a role in the ECD having so many ring connections. It would also answer a question for my FTPU build of having the top and bottom collectors from the same wire, not cut, so the strands of wire are unchanged.