Hello all,

@aether22

I know a lot more then posted because Im f...d!!!

Again my question: who has stolen my email for almost 3 days???

It seems that Im working for somebody unknown?? Heeeey, unknown guys, maybe you can "buy" me like Tesla?? Oh, Im not Tesla! Ha,ha.

Without a power source is nothing going on. This is the official version, the inofficial version I dont want to post!.The problem is: what gives us the 1.trigger when we have a self runner without a battery!! This is the real problem. Or somebody saw SM in the video striving along the TPU with a magnet??

NO. Of course not.

I didnt try this without a collector but the collector is nessesary because "something" must give the particles a way to go, to say so and of course to collect the energy and not to forget, that I have all the time 1 end of the control coil connected to 1 end of a collector to increase the kicks. So, no way to get the same effect.

If you look at my picture you will see something: a pulsed control coil AND a biased control coil but biased in REVERSE direction. If I would connect the + of the bias to the same end where the + of the pulsed control coil is, there would be not 1 watt on the bulb. I tried it.

This type of TPU is OK but....I know why SM a lot of times puts his hand onto the TPU when it works:

THE F...G CORE HEATS UP!!! This heat can destroy the cores in the sence that they change the working properties and then the unit stopps to work.

Otto

Hello all,

@aether22

something must be clear: I have enough power for a 100W bulb!!

My next plan is to make this TPU a self runner. Nothing more.

Otto

Hello all,

ether22

24V/2 - 3A DC.

Please, dont post about over or underunity. This is NOT of interest.

Otto

Hello

@Mac

everything is possible.

The core and the contra bias is the key. As collector use a speaker wire with a looooot of fine wires inside.

Otto

@otto

I found this particular patent that may have some pertinent explanations on the function of your yoke TPU.

I put one image below but the whole patent pdf can be downloaded here.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=tpmod;dl=get80

wattsup

@all

Below may be old hat info for most, but not for all.

@nickc44

Depending upon your mosfet (IRF840, Buz11, etc..) you may be hooking up the mosfet wrong. Check the spec sheet. Don't feel bad if this is the case, as I had the same "on all the time" problem when I first started using mosfets as well. One can tend to think transistor when hooking them up........

______
|__o__|
|         |
|_____|
 |   |   |
 |   |   |
 1  2  3

Pin 1 = Gate
Pin 2 = Drain
Pin 3 = Source

If you hook the mosfet up wrong, it will indeed "stay on", and will not shut off, either if you confuse the Gate and the Drain. (The base will be high all the time.) If you hook up source and drain backwards, it will be conducting all of the time, due to the built in diode.
  _
_| |_ Pulse to Pin 1 (Gate)

+ supply hot to Pin 2 (Drain)

- ground at Pin 3 (Source)

Put the load in series EITHER between power supply + and Drain, OR between Source and - Ground. (different voltage/current/signal effects)

Usually the load is put between source and ground with a current limiting resistor of the needed resistivity.

If this is not the case, then hook up your scope with the circuit running,  from 555 pin 3 (Sqaure Wave Output) and ground to make sure it is still oscillating. If it is, it is not the 555 circuit, it is then the mosfet connections or the mosfet itself. The 555 will not handle a greater voltage than the mosfet's Gate/Source or Gate/Drain breakdown voltages, which the lowest tends to be +-20V, unless you are using the wrong mosfet for the job.  Again, check the spec sheets.

Paul Andrulis

@nickc44

Actually, I have to thank you! I was using NE555 in the test circuit, which source 500ma. I did some more research, just to make sure I was sourcing enough current to saturate the IRF840's properly, and using the TS555CN at 200ma I do not think so, at higher frequencies.

It would be a good idea to put a complimentary emitter-follower gate driver circuit as a higher current buffer for complete gate saturation at higher frequencies.

Here is a pdf for more information on the subject.

http://www.zetex.com/3.0/appnotes/apps/an18.pdf

Again, thanks.

Paul Andrulis

@otto

Use figure 2 in the pdf. Use the 555's pin 3 output to the transistors bases, with a current limiting resistor suitable for drive current according to the transistor(s) needs, and your applied source voltage.

Make sure you are using transistors capable of the frequency. (IE use transistors with some frequency "elbow room" compared to your application. If you are desiring up to 4 Mhz, then make sure your transistors can go to at least 10Mhz or more, for example.

Paul Andrulis