big sparks and burned out 20W light bulbs doesn't prove there is more energy out than in. they show only the output results of a highly-compressed input.

if you know what that means then you know you can't assume that the TOTAL output power exceeds the input power.

to put this into perspective, i could build a step charging device that charges a 10F capacitor from a 1.2V watch battery. it will take several days maybe to charge the cap to 100V, but when I discharge it into a short length of 30 gauge wire, chances are the wire will explode. in this case as is the case similar to MAC's devce, i have simply taken the small energy from a small source and condensed it into a device that will dissipate all that energy in an instant rather than over a 10 day period. this is a more extreme example than what MAC is doing, but it should illustrate well how MAC is creating the big sparks.

so how about we encourage MAC to make a few basic measurements to go along with the exciting light show? without some measurements, would anyone right now bet their life savings that it is ou? ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, i didn't think so

big sparks and burned out 20W light bulbs doesn't prove there is more energy out than in. they show only the output results of a highly-compressed input.

if you know what that means then you know you can't assume that the TOTAL output power exceeds the input power.

to put this into perspective, i could build a step charging device that charges a 10F capacitor from a 1.2V watch battery. it will take several days maybe to charge the cap to 100V, but when I discharge it into a short length of 30 gauge wire, chances are the wire will explode. in this case as is the case similar to MAC's devce, i have simply taken the small energy from a small source and condensed it into a device that will dissipate all that energy in an instant rather than over a 10 day period. this is a more extreme example than what MAC is doing, but it should illustrate well how MAC is creating the big sparks.

so how about we encourage MAC to make a few basic measurements to go along with the exciting light show? without some measurements, would anyone right now bet their life savings that it is ou? ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, i didn't think so

      What you said is very true. But the opposite can be accomplished also.  Say we have an event like the charge seperation resulting from the grid resistive effect  coming out of the wall that gets expressed every 1/60th of a second.  Now we take this force to time relationship and chop it up so that the change in charge  (this is what will be doing the work) happens every millionth or billionth of a second.  (remember it doesnt cost energy to turn something off)  We will now have the charge seperation that does the work doing it's thing every billionth of a second instead of every 1/60th.  A system that does work as a result of changing the charge state or dielectric distribution of a field will see a marvelous overunity effect.

This kind of goes along with what ist is saying; it reminds me of an idea I had some time ago.  I always wondered what kind of results would be achieved if the triple stack tpu wasn't stacked one on top of the other, but if it was actually stacked from the inside out in 3 layers, configured in the exact same manner in all other aspects.  It seems either in wording could be confused with the other, but they both may show different results.  (On top of one another could be taken as vertically on top of one another or layered on one another as concentric coils surrounded by concentric toroids).  I'm not sure if this has ever been considered, maybe it has.

here is my hemf transformer


ist

here is my hemf transformer

What is Hemf exactly?

@all

    In the below diagram if I close switch A between the 6 volt battery and the cap the cap will charge up to 6volts. I charge the capacitor through a resistor to limit the current and do some heatconversion calculations,  should keep the plasma from melting the contacts also.    Then I open up switch A after the cap has topped out at 6volts.   Then I close switch b which completes the circuit for the lc tank whose inductor is the primary in a 6 to 12 volt center tapped transformer.  Now I let this ring until capacitor a is out of juice.  If capacitor B is an identical capacitor will it be charged up to a higher voltage level when all is said and done then capacitor A?
   If I discharge this capacitor through a resistor which resistor gets hotter.  The one that charged capacitor A or the one that discharges capacitor B?
    Any help here from EE's would help.  I guess I could do the circuit but this experiment may have some gross problems I can't predict.

here is my dwg of my cap charger.... 

i beleave this to be the center of a tpu...  i have a design im working on to tap the rmf


ist

tune this buy length to 7.5 hz and swipe a magnet past it to start it or .... charge the cap once and place a magnet in the correct place to cause operation ....


HEY theres NO DIODE
the hemf is collected in the cap and dumped to the control  thus running with gain... if a pulser is used  i have seen some neat things with this setup ..  around 2.5hz  you get the ringggg.  it is kool

so how will you make use of this...

many fine wires ringggg a bell then maybe some balling wire on top the whole thing ...   can it get easyer yet ....  the answer is yes it CAN

BUT FOR NOW SOMBODY BUILD THE DAMN THING...

dont look like mac is talking....

it is possible that it only produces a week magnetic feild but perhaps a strong rotating sclar or electrostatic feild......

ist

@IS

Nice drawing! Strung something like a dream catcher? What are your plans for the core/core winding?

BEP