@ Zorg , Nice to see you here. It's good to meet people from around the world , I'm In the USA. good luck in your reasearch. 

@paul

possibly you have right.
possibly its "omly" surpressed or buy from industry (as SEIKO (?) )

The inventio is priciply to "catch" positrons and neutrinos with 2 different rods.
(so it was sayd, years ago.
some guy send me this papers, that shown very professional.
se here

www.stormloader.com/members/pese/rod

@pese

It may, it may not, I do not know, and cannot state either way. My questions would rise around charge. Protons have charge, but does a neutrino? (If not, then you would still have a charge imbalance of some kind possibly, which could account for charge flow. I can speculate. )
 

Paul Andrulis

@Paul,  we all speculate over "unknow" science.
Science that we have half or nothing understand, because
nothing , aor als "part" of the designs are published.
I thin specially an Cooler (Kola) from them is the most
mystery, and nothing heraed afte 1943, (when he is died.
Was he and his knowlges "stolen" from GB- USA or RU-
How is he died?
But ist was an 700 Wat Maschine,
Another from 7,5 KW that workes nearly one year.
Another from 75HP !! For Electric Notor to driv an airpalin (Storch-Fogger).

We know "nothing". The knowledges are "SAVE" covered and it ss not
as sense , for Industry, Working folks, Goverment, Financial buisiness
to make or to have "Free Energy" solong we can "press" out the world
to give oil and other energies that can "selled".

(so -possibly- the knowledges over the  RODs- are "lost" now
Pese

All is possible, we can ony speculate. I will never say.
Tesla car, Clem car, Mazenaue, Coller, Seike, Rods are not working,
from the "at time published physics" its true- it cant work.
But we know all "lows" the will found and develped in future?
The Laws that work on the above inventions? Its to weak that WE know

@all

Assuming that it (the device) did work, and the inventor understood what was actually happening, what could be the basic underlying reason?

1. Captured Energy: The device gained charge with the capturing of the particles, from the particles themselves.

2. Stimulated Energy: The impact of the particles released stored energy in the materials of the rods, similar to electricity impacting a material and giving off x-rays or light for example. 

These are the only two I can think of under this assumption.

Assuming the inventor did NOT understand the principle.

1. The rods were electrostatic in nature, drawing ions and/or free electrons from the surrounding air, separating charge due to electric field.

2. The rods managed to separate charge from the ambient background electric field.

3. The rods made in effect a new type of battery, with air as the electrolyte.

(These all may be fantastic or "out there", but we are just speculating aren't we.)

What ideas can you guys come up with?

Paul Andrulis

1. Captured Energy
2. Stimulated Energy

These are the only two I can think of under this assumption.

Third one is to assume that law of conservation of energy is flawed, or at least does not apply to aether dynamics.

Reading the posts in this thread has been a real kick. I personally know the inventor of the rods, and the person who took the videos. I have 30+ years of electronic experience, and I have tested the rods and can confirm that they are exactly what the inventor claims they are. Why doesn?t the inventor get ?shocked? when he puts his fingers on both rods at the same time? That information and the rod technology, along with the inventor will be buried in the same grave.

The videos were taken over 10 years ago and were not for the purpose of public viewing. How they became public is unknown. The inventor has no interest in producing the rods, one reason being the negative public attitude as displayed by some in this thread, resulting in various threats. I agree with him.

I use to have an attitude that society was basically looking for a better way of life and standard of living. Getting older, I have come to realize that is a myth. Society (and government, business, and etc.) is the way it is because society likes it that way. If they didn?t, they would change it. It?s not a matter that they don?t have the knowledge, it?s been available for over a hundred years. Remember, it was society that persecuted Galileo, harassed Tesla, and the first doctor that performed a heart transplant, and list goes on and on.

As is known, years ago, Stanley Meyers invented and constructed a totally water powered car. A person in the Philippines currently has converted at least a hundred vehicles to run on water only. Has society praised these men for doing this? Has society demanded that their vehicles be converted? Has society held theses people up as environmental heroes? Has the environmental groups picketed and demanded more production of this technology? NO, of course not. They have been harassed and vilified. And the list goes on.

Therefore, I refuse to spend the rest of my life trying to re-invent the wheel as I have previously. Yes, in my younger years I really thought that society and companies wanted the best. As I said earlier, I have learned that is a myth. My resources are now focused on immediate family and friends. Free energy resources are focused solely on my family. I realize that it is a sad commentary, but the truth is the truth, and I can?t change it. I just wish I had this knowledge about society when I was younger. It would have saved me countless resources and disappointment. I grieve over the waste. Over the decades, hundreds, if not thousands of inventors have tried in vain to help society. It just isn?t going to happen on a mass scale.
 
So much for my rambling on??. I truly wish struggling inventors the best!

hello Justrite
and Bobo

i do agree with Bobo this info needs to be put out to the people.
i my self  dont have the money to do any good  but i could use the info to make my owne and  family and freinds. this is not about money this ia about fe to the people of the planet  all can benifit from it  the poor and the rich.
so if you  know or can get the info please do for the people of the world.

GOD Bless to all
wer

@bobo
The inventor has no interest in releasing any info. If you were to begin producing the rods, you WILL be killed, sued and/or jailed. All units produced would be confiscated. This I can PROMISE. You apparently don?t know who you are ?up against? when you begin to change the world?s energy paradigm.

@Chef
You said, ?I am always laugh, when peoples talking here about, they are not here because of money, and they dont want earn money on that, they want help to peoples, etc.... Bullshit. I had many hard time in my life,I learned alot in situations, where i saw what peoples capable do if they life in danger, i know myself, and i know how we are working, and what peoples want.?

I couldn?t have said it better myself.

@all
"Free" or "un-metered" energy will never be allowed to the people in mass. Whether you believe it or not, there ARE people who control this world, and energy is the current means they are using to do it. Start producing "free" or "un-metered" energy to the masses and you will die (and all those associated with it) before it gets "off the ground." GUARANTEED!! Just develop it for yourself only, and keep quiet about it if you want to live long enough to enjoy it. Sad situation, but true.

...and there is the cold hard truth - keep quiet or become a martyr.

Has the inventor ever mentioned anything to the effect that one rod is oriented one way and the other rod the other way or that the rods are opposite in any way?  Perhaps identical materials but produced in different ways such as curring in fields of opposite polarity?

Has the inventor stated anything concerning the way the rods are connected or not conencted to form a circuit?  or differences along this line of thought?