Guys,
I emailed Archer and asked if he would consider posting on this thread. He advised that his account no longer works but said I can post the following text below. Thanks Archer for taking time to reply
"for the note on the accelerator, two things, for the guy who said
about the 9 liters from 10?
? sorry first of all the equation is
false, when you have a 10 liter bucket and you add ten liters per
minute it overflows at ten liters per minute once full, if you have a
20 liter bucket and add ten liters per minute it overflows at ten
liters per minute once full, the addition of the loop does not alter
the rate of airflow once the tube is full, and considering the airflow
rate is 60litres per second it is full instantly the wind speed
measurement when running with the loop open or closed was the same.
Mike Bell the engineer for whom I built the device is a pilot and
carries a wind speed meter with him always, and if you knew the man,
you would know his testing methods are exceptionally precise, in fact
without insulting the man, he is so pedantic about perfection, that
although his heating equipment is the only kind in the world with no
competition, he keeps upgrading and changing the models so much, that
no one model has lasted a year, which drives everyone in his factory
insane. They spend so much time building new prototypes of existing
products they can't get their own work done. (sorry mike but it's true)
Lower airflow?? ten liters per second is just that regardless of
container size, and if it goes in at that speed it has to come out at
that speed.
So too many things in physics by Newtonian bullshit are not true, EG:
for every action there is an equal or opposite reaction, well you can
print this very in your face proof it is not true in the science
monthly magazine, for in front of mankind?s eyes everyday, especially
science one very basic instrument proves this wrong. A magnet, a
magnet can lift more than it can push, the attraction and hold
properties are greater than the repelling properties. EG: a magnet
capable of pulling a 200KG magnetic block cannot even strapped to a
front end loader moving slowly up to the same block push the 200kg
block along the same surface with that repulsion effect, the hold
effect of a magnet is far greater than the repelling effect. Poor old
Isaac, sorry champ but wrong again, for every reaction there is not an
equal or opposite reaction, that in itself should show you that you
can get movement without power and that magnetic friction is not
equal, thus in the same vein that fall usually equates to lift and why
an evenly balanced wheel will not turn, or an unevenly balanced wheel
can fall but not rise, this does not apply to magnets where the lift
verses repulsion, the lift will always have more (spare) power of the
repulsion, that in itself is natural over unity!!
AS for the smaller version, yes you can build the machine scaled down,
but we need to convince the world this is the answer not some dinky
toy that does a trick, it must run a standard household item so that
all will be convinced and all will move to make the change and general
engineering will get into the act without thinking they need a
research team to do it, and I can assure you up-scaling is not as easy
as it seems, some parts for the small one I was able to buy in toy
scale, but have to be made in the larger scale, this will become
evident when we reach building the control arc.
Hang in there, you have waited this long to see an answer 8 weeks is
nothing, don?t expect too many to start building until it is complete
and working, but you also have my word that I will download it to this
site even before the website."
