@Jack
This sounds like Steven but I have trouble with the theory of operation. If one believes that the frequencies are unimportant and are determined by the circumference of the device then it is not a resonant receiver.
Why is it not a resonant receiver, if the frequencies are determined by the circumfernece? Is that what you are saying?
When a frequency has a wavelength depended on the circumference, that's when you hit resonace and have standing waves. You can have 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2, wavelengths etc.., after all loop antennas become directive when this happens.
What wavelength are we talking about? Is it the one determined by the speed of light? If yes, then the frequencies would have to be very high. (at 300 MHz the wavelength in free space is 1 meter)
What if the wavelength is a sonic wavelength in the iron wire or material? You see weve been down this road before. If you listen carefully to what Steven says in the Dual Ring Open Tpu, he says his frequency is 6kHz, and we approximated that this matches with the speed of sound in the ring judging the size from the video. So we embarked on the MAGNETOSTRICICTION theory for a while and and I still have not discarded this theory yet.
The reality is that Steven did not know how his device realy operated, or rather where the energy comes from, he just stumbled on the effect using 3 frequencies, then later he realized there are so many combinations. So what does all this mean? To me it means it is a type of mixer, and he is heterodyning and mixing frequencies and taping into a low Schumann or radio tower frequency in a VERY EFFICIENT manner so lots of power gets produced. Why does he mention the 7.3 Hz vibration of the first TPU (spool type) ? well, that happens to be close to the Schumann frequency.
Here's some things he said: I and my collogues noted the rather maximum magnetic factors involved with the devices in operation, i.e., there is always extremely strong magnetic fields at frequency at close and distant proximity. We were never able to actually understand what came first... The fields or the power. Are the fields just a coupling mechanism from a power source converted from? Or is the power source that the unit couples just the earth's magnetic field pure and simple?We were coached to come to a decision and maintain that it is the Earth's magnetic field which is the source of the power which is converted by the power units while in operation.
Well, I tell you now Lindsay that actually we never found out what the absolute provable source of the power is. Our founding was cut off. The powers that be assumed we had a marketable item and that money would be available for future research. we would find out all the secrets of the universe, etc.
However, that was not to be.
So here we are..... I tell you that I honestly do not know for sure where the actual source of the power comes from.
and also this:
I am restricted from making any statements involving the following:
Size and number of turns of collector coil.
Material of collector coil.
Control apparatus.
Any control frequency.
Any combinations of control frequencies.
Any lack of controlled frequencies, etc.
Amount of amplification and or power of input needed, etc.
I have been in some difficulty trying to convey as much help as I can while being restricted by these parameters.
Why would the material of a coil be restricted? Because it's something unconventional and the secret revolves around it. Also note it's the material of the COLLECTOR coil.
If you understand some of the theory of magnetostriction you will understand a lot.
more:
This is exactly what I said to Dr. Schinzinger the first day I met him. I blatantly admitted that we knew how to make the music but had no idea how the violin worked. He told me that he understood fully what I meant and that he wanted to work on the solution with me if I would be willing. I agreed and was excited with the thought, but the gentlemen I worked with did not think it was such a good idea.
more:
I understand about your frustration concerning your experiments. I was never frustrated because I stumbled on to the right combination and then just worked up more from there.
more:
However, I very much enjoyed the concepts you sent to me because these people appear to be thinkers and in fact have many parts to the concept puzzle. If you read the information provided by many research scientists you will find that it seems to always point to some form of release or catalyst of sorts occurring.? .Note that in the TPU this is what happens. I never had the benefit of knowing exactly what was going on inside the thing. We had theories and so on but never any concrete facts. I kept moving frequencies up and down, changing control devices and size of rings the kind of wire and materials used and over the years we developed some basics for tpu design. But we never found out all of the high order thinking involving the depth of some of the research I have read about.
Sincerely,
SM
EM