I thought I should perhaps remind you of an interesting passage from SM's letters:

It is obvious that most of the people trying to duplicate my experiment are not of the intellectual caliper necessary to develop my technology or at the very least they need to invest in some laboratory grade instruments in order to develop any progress.
I assumed that anyone working on technology this sophisticated would have a superior knowledge of electronics and an understanding of PURE frequency output being a Necessity to control the reactions going on inside the collector.  
Please place this on the web site and let them know that if they do not have a more then average understanding of electron flow then they should not endeavor to try and duplicate my device because they do not stand a chance. I am tired of reading their disappointments because they do not have the education or the knowledge necessary to duplicate my technology.
Sincerely,
SM     

and also this one:

...One of the guys who wrote in to the site said something about magnetic fields rotating at incredible speeds... and I told you that he had it! That was part of the answer. You must understand the concept of this technology in order to make more of these things. if you simply copied one it would not be conducive to your ability to make one even the slightest bit smaller or larger or different.
If you could imagine a magnetic field rotating at super fast speeds across a wire, you would see that everything we have been taught to believe about electron flow becomes different.
Think about the fact that in energy conversion using transformers, the alternating voltage is always so slow, it is like molasses...

@all

If I have seemed testy or a little snappy today, I apologize.
 
I know it is no excuse, if I have unnecessarily been verbally harsh to anyone for any reason, but please understand that my 2 yr old daughter has developed a viral chest infection, of which I was just informed today, and I am not particularly in a good mood at the moment. Thankfully it has not developed into pneumonia yet, but I have personally had pneumonia enough times to know just how fast that can change.  :'(

Paul Andrulis

Photons are virtual packets of electromagnetic information. Virtual particles are a very interesting topic, as it requires the conservation laws to be temporarily obsolete, but restored afterwards. In a sense, they are like the virtual memory on a computer. When not being used for ram overflow, they are basicaly used to map with the physical memory. Thus, they virtual memory isn't being used for the application, but sort of the behind the scenes action. Gravitons, also virtual, are a similiar concept to photons, but instead used to address gravity.

- Just trying to clear some things up...

It's all correct, right? I'm not in any physics stuff right now, but this is what I understand.

A light bulb does not put out coherent light in any form....??

It is laser that outputs coherent light. Light source working in a laser does not have to be coherent. Laser's "reflective chamber" produces coherent light and that's why it becomes powerful and thin.

Protons are positively charged, and electrons negatively charged.

Protons are not just 'positively charged', they are lacking 1 electron. This is a different thing than some 'positive charge'.

A permanent magnet has within itself a moving electric charge, due to the availability of free electrons within the atomic structure, the structure of electron shells of certain atoms, and peculularities of molecular alignment and interaction within the overall particular magnetic substance.....?

I'm not sure this correct. If they had an electrical field they would produce an electrical potential.

Concerning the electron/magnetic field/books.... what books?

Well, I've surfed Internet for this information. In many places there were references to real books. Of course, I can't give you these references, but you may use a websearch for these keywords - you'll likely to find a relevant information.

A "lack of charge" is called neutrally charged, not positively charged. It is by definition NOT of ANY charge.....??

Neutral charge is not a "lack of charge". Neutrally-charged particle is when all protons have electrons attached to them. Proton is like a "charge hole". It is in this respect becomes a "positive charge", because it really is lacking 1 electron charge. It may have some special "positive charge" field associated with it, but I've never read about that.

An ion, by basic definition is a charged atom or molecule. Free charged particles themselves are called ionizing radiation....?? You have me really confused here. (Just being honest.)

No, ionizing radiation is EM waves of high energy that produces ions by "bombarding" atoms and molecules.

I am not trying to insult you. I truly am not, but your responses to this last post make absolutely no sense to me, from the physics standpoint. If you are trying to speak a concept, and do not have the proper words to express your concepts, please state so and I will try to interpret. I do not fault anyone for this.

In this latest discussion I'm not talking concepts. This is what I've understood and learned. The only concept I was talking is "DC acoustical waves" which frankly saying do not interfere with any other physical phenomena. It only adds a tiny bit. And it is not an aether in common sense like a gaseous substance. DC acoustical waves are virtual as much as photons are virtual particles.

I have to agree. It is time to build this puppy. Whether one uses sine/squares/sawtooth.... I DONT CARE! Just try for rotation of the field, which would be discernable using nothing more than a cheapo compass. Get the field rotating, then post your schematic for this part of the coil, we can worry about the collectors when we achieve this.

You are right, no more words are needed. Just make sure rotation is achieved by sharp pulses, not by AC or DC current as in conventional schematics.

pauldude000, I think it is important to note that electric and magnetic fields can be exchanged depending on the inertial frame of reference. I'm not sure what does that mean, but it surely means that electricity and magnetism form a system of relations between them. So, while electron has no magnetic field, it may be involved in electro-magnetic interactions.

Well, it's all being pretty complex, I have no desire to continue arguing session. I hope cyclic pulsing will give you what you are looking for - no need for theories that much. Just do not try to tell physicists you have overunity - protect your brain cells.

Only a rotating field will not give anything AFAIK, but add a DC bias to the collector wire once the rotating field is set up...lifting the hose and squeezing it...

I guess this should be exactly fine! Rotating field or gravity is nothing if it has nothing to accelerate. DC bias should provide the necessary meat to accelerate. It's like having a sattelite without velocity: it will dump itself onto planet. If it has velocity, planet will only add energy to its speed.

yes, I second that.   the only reason that light is refered to quanta, photon etc is because it doesn't come in a continuous spectrum since it's emited by atoms and they are quantized, or rather the electron orbits are quantized, etc..    so at the physical level, light is EM radiation just like radio waves, but of a much higher frequency.

EM