Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.  (Read 48891 times)

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.
« Reply #45 on: November 13, 2008, 03:40:09 PM »
       It's peculiar that an induction motor can deliver torque up to 90 percent efficiency.  The other 10 percent is lost as heat from the windings and bearings and steel cooling fan and conductor heating noise both mechanical and electrical.  These motors don't even utilize the b magnetic field produced by the winding coils and often this field results in stator tooth heating and end lamination heating.  I don't think it would take too much redesign to push it over the top.
    No where in this motor design is it taken into account the intrinsic energy of the mass. A piece of copper wire is not without potential energy stored in it's atomic lattice as is the iron void of intrinsice energy.

AnandAadhar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
    • The Order of Time
Re: IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.
« Reply #46 on: November 23, 2008, 09:52:50 AM »
Maybe i'll reopen the IPMM case with an 5.0 version of implementing the Achilles Ligeras/Dave Squires concept. So the loop would be pulsed by the piston that is placed in response to the cakra pulsing off-center. Will it work? I'll try a design and keep you posted if it does.
see threads:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5671.new#new
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5674.0;topicseen

AA

I have posted a YouTube movie on design IPMM 5.0. In this design I have added a Squires drive to alternate the feedback. That results in a working model. In this I add up the cakra-pulse to the pulse of the Squires drive. That offers a wave function in which the peak might lead to an OU effect. The control function in 5.0 is served by gravity in the form of a pendant. That offers an extra need to tune the frequencies. As yet I have not succeeded to sufficiently control this complicated wave function and deliver proof of OU with the IPMM. What is won though is a machine with a reasonable pulse control and spin down. The best version thus far. Stephan commented on YouTube that the design would be too complicated. Yes simplicity is a wanted thing, but I need to try to add the two pulses with gravity now and that is an evolutionary complication of the IPMM that is given by my course. We'll see if I can get it simple.  At the other hand I also have thought to need the skills of a clock maker to control the stator/rotor difference in forces to have it chase its own reaction force. That certainly wouldn't be a simple matter. Ever tried to disassemble and reassemble a clock mechanism? Think of Findsud's complicated balancing game to achieve the selfrunning status with magnetism and gravity...
Under the thread of the similar ALME drive I have posted a suggestion for a replication. I'm not sure what I'll do next IPMM or ALME. For ALME the video proof is lacking, so a replication would be an off-side offense in terms of soccer, not?

See :
YouTube for IPMM 5.0:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pdnkfrNv0
URL of the suggested ALME replication:
http://theorderoftime.com/science/free_energy/support-files/ALME-repl.html
Sterling's ALME thread:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5674.0;topicseen
Magnet motor real? (ALME/Squires discussion):
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5671.0;topicseen
My free energy research pages:
http://theorderoftime.com/science/free_energy/index.html


« Last Edit: November 23, 2008, 10:23:22 AM by AnandAadhar »

AnandAadhar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
    • The Order of Time
Re: IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.
« Reply #47 on: January 28, 2009, 12:23:57 PM »
I have loaded an analysis of Finsrud's device with my conclusions about the basic principles of the device. This led to a version IPMM 6. This version is still under construction. What is demonstated was just to explain the basic principles of the 'Finsrud-accord' to work with IPMM 6.
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q

The_Jerk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.
« Reply #48 on: February 15, 2009, 08:53:30 AM »
I love the original.  Lots of duct tape and rough cut plastic, this is what the world waits for in engineers, physicists and all pioneers of technology.  People absolutely have to be completely outside the book on physics since they really don't know shit.  Even Einstein only caught on to like .9 percent of all human knowledge.  The information has to combined with common sense to be pushed forward.  I believe that traditional educations run people into walls of possibility and grind down the imagination which, all these assholes seem to forget, is why we have physics and math in the first place.  Advancement has always been the keen observance of nature.  That first video is an example of why other life forms are even interested in us, it's because of our ingenuity.  The so called great minds are usually bought and paid for and the rogue scientists are shunned by their community, just like Tesla was.  We should all look to his work for guidance, even though the feds stole almost all of it when he died.  We are close here, very close!  I have seen many designs and devices that are on the head of the universal needle

Ergo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.
« Reply #49 on: February 15, 2009, 10:02:11 PM »
We are close here, very close!  I have seen many designs and devices that are on the head of the universal needle
But still light years away because this device was never even close to be working....

AnandAadhar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
    • The Order of Time
Re: IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.
« Reply #50 on: February 16, 2009, 08:39:47 AM »
But still light years away because this device was never even close to be working....

I agree, I'm light years away from a working device, but I've not given it up yet. I am still convinced this drive offers an advantage that is not sufficiently explored. After all is it with its magnetic vortex an improved Hamel disc that allows one of the two (stator/rotor) to be fixed. At present I am experimenting with version 7: I fix the stator here, but have put the plate on a swing so that gravity is more involved as with 5 & 6  and thus Finsrud's principles can be better respected. As yet there is nothing conclusive I can say about this attempt apart from the fact that I am a quantum mechanical nerd who has to learn a lot.  On YouTube someone said he would try it with an electromotor to see whether the little force required to move the plate can be delivered by the spin of the disc. Even though that is against my findings in version 4, and I am convinced that only involvement of a second force like gravity can have success, might it still work with electricity feeds in some Bedini-like schematic. I will keep it posted here if that leads to anything.

AnandAadhar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
    • The Order of Time
IPMM crop circle!
« Reply #51 on: May 04, 2009, 02:12:20 PM »
 :D This IPMM crop circle appeared 29 April in 2009 at Wiltshiire Roundway Hill, in Oilseed  field, U.K. (© Lucy Pringle). Now this puzzles me very much. Sterling Allen at http://pesn.com/2009/05/03/Mylow-magnet-motor_crop-circle/ thought a similar circle indicative of Mylow's latest pattern, because at that date his magnet motor was uploaded at YouTube. But I think this circle resembles very much my IPMM cakra disc, precisely the way I've been experimenting with it lately. See IPMM version 5 and 6 version at the end of my Finsrud study-video where I have a likewise big gap in the middle, using a ring magnet as stator. My disc has at the moment 14 banana wings, while the circle shows eighteen. The concentric circles correspond with the stack of ring magnets I was experimenting with the other day. I have built a better rotor disc now for testing Mylow's claims, but I will also test this design with the better rotor plate. How remarkable a coincidence! Aliens confirming my design!

IPMM 6-Finsrud video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q&feature=channel_page
IPMM 5 -Squires version http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pdnkfrNv0&feature=channel_page
Sterling Allen confusing the IPMM-circle with the Mylow circle.
http://pesn.com/2009/05/03/Mylow-magnet-motor_crop-circle/
Mylow circle thread:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7162.msg176200#msg176200
Lucy Pringle's Photos
http://www.lucypringle.co.uk/photos/2009/apr.shtml
« Last Edit: May 04, 2009, 02:44:34 PM by AnandAadhar »

Ergo

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
Re: IPMM crop circle!
« Reply #52 on: May 04, 2009, 06:18:25 PM »
Aliens confirming my design!

But we all know crop circles are man-made. It's been confirmed over and over.
There are no aliens or alien manifestations.

AnandAadhar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
    • The Order of Time
IPMM update.
« Reply #53 on: November 28, 2009, 10:02:52 AM »
A small update. I am presently at version IPMM 11. Previous versions engaged double cakra discs in alternate action for testing timing differences and pendulums with transfer mechanisms for testing, exploring and understanding the Finsrud principles. None of the designs worked but taught me to focus better on the essence of what the magnet motor principles would be. I don't post movies or initiate discussions here of that anymore because I don't want to advertise failures any longer. I am presently with design IPMM 11 trying a combination of a Johnson stator track and a cakra controlled rotor which conserves the magnetic reaction force and makes the rotor unidirectional with a clear spin preference depending on a time difference. I'll keep you posted on positive results, otherwise I remain silent.

AA

AnandAadhar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
    • The Order of Time
IPMM update. Version 14 & 16
« Reply #54 on: August 18, 2010, 03:07:08 PM »
I have arrived now at version IPMM sixteen in which I try to employ a flat disc oscillator to amplify the pulse for the disc in its loop. For version number 14, I posted a video  on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYAKzW0H2yY
In this video I test the subject rotation by oscillation to economize (and amplify) the pulse in my feedbackmechanism. At present for design 16 I am unlinkuing the dynamics of the gravity oscillation and the magnetic stator/rotor transfer. In the video of IPMM 14 they are still linked. IPMM 14 looks  fairly simple but unlinking the two dynamics gives a more complicated design. Version 15 was a first attempt at a Finsrud replication. I am completely unsatisfied about it and will not post the video of it. Too arguable. Checking Milkovic two phase pendulum I now investigate the oscillator he has in common with Finsrud. Can it be of complementary action in the IPMM setup so that time will manifest as kinetic energy when we oppose gravity with magntism? That is the research question I am testing now. Maybe later a more thorough Finsrud replication will follow when design IPMM 16 fails. I'll keep you friends posted with videos on real progress.

See also the Milkovic discussion:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1763.new;topicseen#new
My first Milkovic trial to loop:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJsXLiLNJHA&feature=related

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: IPMM crop circle!
« Reply #55 on: August 22, 2010, 03:25:04 PM »
But we all know crop circles are man-made. It's been confirmed over and over.
Interesting. Please provide a link to the evidence for this.

CompuTutor

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
Re: IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.
« Reply #56 on: August 22, 2010, 03:52:53 PM »
So many of the concepts depicted in crop circles
are so far above the conceptual intelligence of locals,
that it becomes excessively improbable quite quickly
mere mortal "Local's" even had the art to re-create.

If you have the noodle to portray such advanced concepts
with both visually and mathamatically sound principles in ONE PIC.

Your not out in some field fartin' around with crop circles...



My interpretation of the above shows the natural spiraling
magnetics of "magnetic current" in velocity around cores.

If you could look at the end of a wire straight on
while it was conducting cold electricity through it,
the force lines would look just like that.

We tend to only think of one electroplated metal
on a wire core of another metal.

Silver on copper, copper on iron, etc.

What if the point is more than one outer layer ?

hoarybat

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: IPMM crop circle!
« Reply #57 on: August 22, 2010, 09:35:54 PM »
But we all know crop circles are man-made. It's been confirmed over and over.
There are no aliens or alien manifestations.

Not necessarily, below is a video showing a crop formation being made during the day likely from above with no humans on the ground.  There was purportedly no tampering of the video tape itself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SJvVW8s_Oc&feature=related

ragnew

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: IPMM MAN-device for the proof of magnetic overunity.
« Reply #58 on: August 26, 2010, 10:18:19 PM »
Its a little off topic but as far as the crop circles go, obviously some are a hoax but there are a whole bunch that cannot be easily explained away.

Just my two cents.

AnandAadhar

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
    • The Order of Time
A short update about the IPMM, just to show that this thread is not dead and I am still on the job.
At present I have arrived at the IPMM 16.6. I have successfully linked the rotor to a pendulum of about two kg. The pendulum now drives the rotor with ease. The fixed frequency of the pendulum results in a fixed amplitude of the rotor output. Several 16.x designs to close the loop with the two basic forces of gravity and magnetism have failed as yet. But I still have good hopes to succeed. As you might know I am still testing the (Finsrud) hypothesis that magnetism and gravity combined will result in an overunity response of kinetically manifesting time energy/space energy/dark energy once the proper arrangement to engage these complementary basic forces of nature is found. Preliminary conclusion is that this can only be true if I engage a flat oscillator with centrifugal force to break through the sticky point of the rotor. The oscillator on the output of the rotor stores the reaction force and releases its energy when needed so that the rotor stabilizes and thus properly timed can be driven by the pendulum. But the great classical 'sin' of closing the loop, is the big hurdle. There are so many options to test.... No video's about my failed attempts as yet, not to burden you with the false hopes that are reserved for me only. A meditator should not desire results but a proper meditation.