To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

Storing Cookies (See : ) help us to bring you our services at . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: New Cold Fusion tests  (Read 3968 times)

Offline sandstugan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
New Cold Fusion tests
« on: April 01, 2008, 09:18:14 PM »

Offline ApEkV2

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: New Cold Fusion tests
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2009, 05:07:52 AM »
That fluke probably ran some money.  Good work.  Can you try putting a microwave oven transformer's primary side in series with the anode?  Here is what I'm talking about.
I couldn't find a MoT (microwave transformer) so instead I improvised and used an oil burner transformer.  The problem is this transformer does not like a lot of current.  All you need to do is only connect the primary of the MoT in series with the anode.  Don't use the secondary just yet, I am still trying to figure out how to best use it. 

How much do you like that Fluke oscilloscope?  Would you recommend one?


Offline sirmikey1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
Re: New Cold Fusion tests
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2009, 02:01:37 AM »

Here's a news article today on this if anyone might want to investigate:

Offline hurvana69

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: New Cold Fusion tests
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2009, 10:11:04 PM »
Another New Article Today!  This is exciting!,2933,510589,00.html