Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Solid States Devices => solid state devices => Topic started by: Spoodily on March 23, 2008, 10:01:30 AM

Title: The Lorentz-O
Post by: Spoodily on March 23, 2008, 10:01:30 AM
After seeing Steven Mark's device on youtube and the progress here I couldn't help thinking about another video I have seen.  I hope this video provides some inspiration.  Look up Stan Deyo and what he has to say.

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/3014/Antigravity_easily_explained_by_Stan_Deyo___Part_5/ (http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/3014/Antigravity_easily_explained_by_Stan_Deyo___Part_5/)

Regards,
Spoodily
Title: Re: The Lorentz-O
Post by: MACEDONIA CD on March 24, 2008, 12:19:42 AM
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

lets moving ouround ;) :)
Title: Re: The Lorentz-O
Post by: RobotHead on March 25, 2008, 12:19:16 AM
Interesting video, although he talks a lot about anti-gravity, he does go into free energy and Tesla later on in these videos.

He talks about some very interesting free energy principles.  Although I disagree on his sentiments on Zero Point, his comments are worth watching.  This is a new video and people should watch it for the free energy segments if nothing else.

Worth watching!
Title: Re: The Lorentz-O
Post by: Spoodily on March 26, 2008, 04:46:20 PM
Thanks for watching the videos.  I hope people watch them all, there are several segments to them.


This is a post I have made in "Complete information on working SM style device".  I put it here as well so I didn't lose it.  http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4297.msg83207.html#msg83207 (http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4297.msg83207.html#msg83207)

Quote
Judging by what I've read from the OP's links and pictures I see a few things that I have seen in some variation before.

First, but not the focus of this post, is the hexagonal lattice stuff.  It reminds me of Metatron's Cube and its relationship to cymatics.  Keep in mind that cymatics deals with all waves (electromagnetic ones, too), sound is just an easy medium to experiment with because you can see its results using sand and a metal plate.  There are carvings in the Rossalyn Chapel that depict such vibrational patterns.  There are 13 carvings in total, a number in common with Metatron's Cube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy2Dg-ncWoY (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cy2Dg-ncWoY)

This version of the cube leaves spaces in between the circles/spheres on the outer edge, this picture has 13 circles total.  If the rim was complete, it alone would contain 12 individual circles, 13 if you count the start and end as individual.  If the outer circles were there you would see 6 triangles with a shared edge and all with a common center.  From the center they each would be in a 1-2-3 configuration.  If we multiply each number by 3 we get 3-6-9.  Familiar?
Quote
"If you only knew the magnificence of the 3, 6, and 9,
then you would have a key to the universe." - Nicola Tesla
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ee/Metatrons_cube.svg/200px-Metatrons_cube.svg.png)

Quote
The Fruit of Life (a component of the Flower of Life) has thirteen circles. If each circle's center is considered a "node", and each node is connected to each other node with a single line, a total of seventy-eight lines are created. Within this cube, many other shapes can be found, including two-dimensionally flattened versions of the five Platonic solids. The true Metatron's Cube will include all five Platonic solids in such a way that the solids, existing in volumetric 3D space, have had their z-coordinates set to zero but their x- and y-coordinates retained, such that they are orthogonally flattened.

In early kabbalist scriptures, Metatron supposedly forms the cube from his soul. This cube can later be seen in Christian art, where it appears on his chest or floating behind him. Metatron's cube is also considered a holy glyph, and was often drawn around an object or person to ward off demons and satanic powers. This idea is also present in alchemy, in which the cube was favoured as a containment circle or creation circle.

The simplest means of constructing Metatron's Cube is to begin with a cube flattened along a space diagonal, such that it becomes a 2D figure, equivalent to a regular hexagon divided via its own diagonals into six equilateral triangles. The vertices of this 2D figure are then connected with additional lines. Several steps later, the full Metatron's Cube figure is formed. This method requires dividing vertices according to the golden ratio. There is also a method of construction from the Flower of Life. The cube resembles the fourth dimensional analog of the cube, or the Tesseract.
Quote
Cymatics is the study of wave phenomena. It is typically associated with the physical patterns produced through the interaction of sound waves in a medium.

A simple experiment demonstrating the visualisation of cymatics can be done by sprinkling sand on a metal plate and vibrating the plate, for example by drawing a violin bow along the edge, the sand will then form itself into standing wave patterns such as simple concentric circles. The higher the frequency, the more complex the shapes produced, with certain shapes having similarities to traditional mandala designs.

Next up is the unique design shape in the new setup.  This immediately reminded me of another device I have seen.

This is an experiment by Chris Hardeman.
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/gravshld.htm (http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/gravshld.htm)- This is the creator's site.
http://rakudragon.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!9217E98F7966F901!532.entry (http://rakudragon.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!9217E98F7966F901!532.entry)- This is a 'fan' site with info compiled in one place.
(http://jnaudin.free.fr/images/christst.jpg)

This was Hardeman's inspiration:
(http://jnaudin.free.fr/images/barbury91.jpg)
(http://byfiles.storage.live.com/y1pc9IE-zKhqZt1RfsdJPTAD4rCBj75BJa6bxz_SP7ms-o-2ASl7Kh9y78GxpULrk-ltdShw_093os)
(http://byfiles.storage.live.com/y1pc9IE-zKhqZskmN40dmxOow4CvmxUpIT-s1cBOxGbW89rGuSe_rLE40ZIhc6bvpRbVD7sZGpgCeg)

Still with me? :)  I feel that I came to a place where thinkers and people with open minds come to share information about creating the 'impossible'.  I hope I can be open with you and you'll hear me without an attachment to 'beliefs'.  This is about the science and not about the ideology.
Quote
"The problem with ideology is, if you've got an ideology, you've already got your mind made up. You know all the answers and that makes evidence irrelevant and arguments a waste of time. You tend to govern by assertion and attacks."
-Bill Clinton former president of the USA, 18th Oct 2006 , at an event sponsored by the Center for American Progress.

These are two videos that can also be found on the 'fan' site.  They come from http://www.cropcircleship.com (http://www.cropcircleship.com).  They have recently opened a wiki format of their information.  http://www.cropcircleship.com/wiki/Main_Page (http://www.cropcircleship.com/wiki/Main_Page)

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5754670943097613356 (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5754670943097613356)- An Introduction to the Crop Circle Ship
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-433288732754891412 (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-433288732754891412)- Into the Watersphere

None of their information is set in stone, it's a work in progress.  This is why I feel it is relevant information and up for re-interpretation.  It's not really important who put the formations and patterns on the ground, but it is not coincidence that a large portion have a common theme to them.  This is what the videos are pointing out, some are possibly blueprints that can be used to build something.  They have done a lot of legwork in finding similarities and matching 'parts' between different formations.  If you approach their research with a fresh pair of eyes something might 'click' for you.  Their information is a suggestion, look at it in an unbiased fashion.

Now I mentioned that I did not care who put this 'information' on the ground as long as the 'information' is coherent and relates to other formations that also contain similar 'information'.  The reason I don't care who put it there is that it doesn't matter and I'll tell you why.  In fall of 2002 I saw a craft that is best known as a UFO or an OVNI depending on where you're from.  I saw the entire profile of the vehicle while standing in some guy's front yard as I was delivering pizzas.  It hovered stationary in the sky for about 3-4 seconds from when I first noticed it and then darted off to the right and was gone.  It had what looked to be 'windows' down the side with red light on inside the vehicle.  When it departed, there was streak of red light hanging in the sky (from the 'windows').  Now, we could debate on whether little green men were on board or whether it was a man made top secret vehicle but it doesn't matter.  What matters is that the 'impossible' is real and it didn't look to be 'out of this world' high-tech.  There was no sound during its hover or rapid acceleration, no sonic booms, no wind, no anything.

All I really care to know is how it was powered.  Is there a way to be pulling so much energy that there aren't enough places to put it so the best place to deposit this excess of energy is into electro-magnetic repulsion/attraction?  The reason I say this is the way in which the craft departed from a complete standstill, leaving a streak of light and emitting or creating no sound.  It looked like it pulled the place it wanted to go to itself rather than propelling itself there, like it was a rock loading itself into a slingshot, the rubber band being physical space/time.

You guys are not by any means wasting your time working on this over-unity project.  There will always be doubters, skeptics and people who don't believe the possibility of what you know to be worthwhile and real.  They are armchair quarterbacks that come from the "Show Me" state, providing little more than negative opinions derived from their personal ideology.

I'll leave you with a quote, I think it applies here.
Quote
"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." - Samuel L. Clemens, aka Mark Twain

Regards and good luck,
Spoodily
Title: Re: The Lorentz-O
Post by: RobotHead on April 02, 2008, 10:53:45 PM
For anyone following Stan Deyo and his technology, he just did an interview on the Richard Syrett show.

You can download it here.  Click on the 3 downloads from March 31, 2008 show.  It's free.

http://www.richardsyrett.com/audioarchive.htm

He talks about coils and how they could store enough energy to blow up a neighborhood.  Sounds a lot like SM stuff.
Title: Re: The Lorentz-O
Post by: Spoodily on April 03, 2008, 02:39:38 AM
For anyone following Stan Deyo and his technology, he just did an interview on the Richard Syrett show.

You can download it here.  Click on the 3 downloads from March 31, 2008 show.  It's free.

http://www.richardsyrett.com/audioarchive.htm

He talks about coils and how they could store enough energy to blow up a neighborhood.  Sounds a lot like SM stuff.

Thanks for the tip!  I look forward to listening to them and appreciate you visiting this thread.

-Spoodily  :)


On a side note as long as I'm posting in my own thread...

I think that cymatics is an important science that is being overlooked as though it were a novelty of no real value.

This is a direct link to all the cymatics videos on youtube.com.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=cymatics&search_type= (http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=cymatics&search_type=)

These three videos in particular are good to watch:

Cymatics-part1: Bringing matter to life with sound - 1 of 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ViMy_aIm5Q (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ViMy_aIm5Q)
Cymatics-part1: Bringing matter to life with sound - 2 of 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxOZ--igANs (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxOZ--igANs)
Cymatics-part1: Bringing matter to life with sound - 3 of 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gVKvDhT79o (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gVKvDhT79o)

Cymatics applies to all waves, sound is just an easy visual experiment.

When people talk about 'resonance frequency'  they need to have in mind how cymatics applies to electromagnetic waves and the results thereof.  What really caught my eye was when the sand started spinning like a galaxy...  watch the videos.

Regards and thank you,
Spoodily