Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Google Search

Custom Search

Author Topic: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg  (Read 249923 times)

Offline Nali2001

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #165 on: February 07, 2011, 02:06:09 PM »
Hello Alstream,

Do you know more about this system?
Are you in contact with Inkomp-delta?
Do you know the patent number?

Thanks!
Steven


Offline TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13968
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #166 on: February 07, 2011, 05:16:35 PM »
Over a year, and only six new posts in this thread talking about a "TRULY OVERUNITY" meg device.

Sad. Very sad.

But I am very glad that you are becoming suspicious about what I call "naive" power measurements.


Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #167 on: February 07, 2011, 05:54:08 PM »
Over a year, and only six new posts in this thread talking about a "TRULY OVERUNITY" meg device.

Sad. Very sad.

But I am very glad that you are becoming suspicious about what I call "naive" power measurements.

I do agree with that. The power measurement in question are indeed naive.

Offline Nali2001

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #168 on: February 07, 2011, 06:38:33 PM »
Well anyway if there is more info about this system I'm very interested. So if there is a public patent number please let me know. In my opinion this is still the most promising 'meg' approach. Only thing is nobody is really building and testing. But than again not much is know about the device either.

Thanks

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5031
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #169 on: February 07, 2011, 07:29:31 PM »
Valeri Chobanov Pat.BG109554 dated 2006/published 2007 without details.

1.000-1.500 $/KW,"nice" price  :-[ !

Sincerely
               CdL

Offline alstream

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • Incomp Technology
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #170 on: February 08, 2011, 05:54:52 AM »
Hello Alstream,

Do you know more about this system?
Are you in contact with Inkomp-delta?
Do you know the patent number?

Thanks!
Steven
I know, we work together.

Offline alstream

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • Incomp Technology
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #171 on: February 08, 2011, 06:08:14 AM »
I do agree with that. The power measurement in question are indeed naive.
Correctly measured - the problem.
Moreover, it is very expensive equipment.

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #172 on: February 08, 2011, 06:16:24 AM »
Correctly measured - the problem.
Moreover, it is very expensive equipment.

Like what? Tell us more about the measurement.

Offline Nali2001

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #173 on: February 08, 2011, 06:40:51 PM »
Cool!
Is there anything you can tell about the technology?
Is the system in production yet?

Thanks

I know, we work together.

Offline alstream

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • Incomp Technology
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #174 on: February 08, 2011, 08:54:08 PM »
Like what? Tell us more about the measurement.
I can put some pictures, will be clear .

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #175 on: February 08, 2011, 09:03:16 PM »
I can put some pictures, will be clear .

Pictures alone won't be enough. Tell us something about the methodology of measurement.

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #176 on: February 08, 2011, 09:05:53 PM »
Of course, if it's a self-sustaining device you don't need to show any measurements. If it isn't, however, you're in for a big trouble if you try to sustain your OU claims. Measurements to do that aren't at all as straightforward as they may seem at first glance.

Offline alstream

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • Incomp Technology
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #177 on: February 08, 2011, 09:08:39 PM »
Cool!
Is there anything you can tell about the technology?
Is the system in production yet?

Thanks
Today we are ready to pass to the level of production.
There are some investors, but all is for the present opened.

Offline alstream

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • Incomp Technology
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #178 on: February 08, 2011, 09:12:11 PM »
Of course, if it's a self-sustaining device you don't need to show any measurements. If it isn't, however, you're in for a big trouble if you try to sustain your OU claims. Measurements to do that aren't at all as straightforward as they may seem at first glance.
"a self-sustaining device" ?
No.. 

Offline alstream

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • Incomp Technology
Re: A truly overunity Transformer / Meg
« Reply #179 on: February 08, 2011, 09:20:26 PM »
Pictures alone won't be enough. Tell us something about the methodology of measurement.
Unfortunately, the best measurements, it when  identical loading
 work from full batteries one hour, and with connection of the device about four hours.