A couple of things that everyone should know.

SM stated, in his email response to the Bob Boyce .PDF, that it took them years to understand that they could not understand WHY it worked!  So once again, Spherics is correct.

SM stated, "That it would take a hundred years before anyone found the correct frequency."  And it would have had not Spherics given it to us.

Some of you fail to realize the momentous occasion this is.  I am stunned.  Being a skeptic is fine, but open your mind.  Let's build both Spherics version 2008 TPU and Spherics explanation for the Early TPU. 

Over the many months, some have made preconception of how the TPU works, and this, for you does not fit.  I am sorry.  Our versions were always missing the two most important factors, and I have shouted it from the rooftops:  The CORRECT frequency(s) and the RMF or rotating magnetic field. 

Many of us wanted the solution to be something that fit into our preconseption.  Spherics has seemingly improved on the original design and took time to understand "WHY" it works, so that such said improvement could be made. 

Secret Frequency:  NMR of FE and its harmonics

SM's Early TPU:
A minimal delay in a split signal, resulting in a huge magnetic field.  I would also pulse this with a "harmonic" of the NMR of FE.  I can picture in my mind why the NMR of FE would work, but I can not yet put it into understandable words.

IMHO:  This is the real deal and the long sought after answer.

Did SM's later TPU's wire up different?  I am sure.  They learned to use the static magnetic dc bias on the control wires (Kick coils) and more collectors, etc.

Lastly, Spherics choice of "Spherics" for a user name ought to tell you something, if nothing else.  SM's company name, that we did not know until the DAY AFTER Spherics first post.  Come on guys, let's finally make something that works. 

Cheers all,

Bruce

GREAT! so its finally here and working for a change?....or at least on paper?.

I would like to correct a previous posting of mine--Omnispace has gently reminded me that only the real portion of the wattage mentioned must be dissipated as heat.  So if the circuit can recover the back-EMF spike from the coil, the power dissipation will be much less.

I wish Spherics had provided even rough dimensions for the coils in his design--I will be using 1.25" long by 15/16" inside diameter air-core coils with around 275 turns of 24ga. wire on them (this just happens to be the exact dimensions of the coils that come from RadioShack!    I've gotten lazy...)

The main concern I have about the information presented here is that the NMR frequency of iron is not constant!  It will vary with external magnetic field strength.  I may have an idea, however, that would also explain the shutdown when flipped over on SM's device:

Earth's field NMR
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in the geomagnetic field is conventionally referred to as Earth's field NMR (EFNMR). Note that the same acronym is used for electric field NMR.

EFNMR is a special case of low field NMR.

When placed in a constant magnetic field and stimulated (perturbed) by a pulsed or alternating magnetic field, NMR active nuclei (such as 1H or 13C) resonate at frequencies characteristic of the isotope. The resonant frequencies and signal strengths are proportional to the strength of the applied magnetic field. Thus in the 21 tesla magnetic field that may be found in high resolution laborotory NMR spectrometers, protons resonate at 900 MHz. However in the Earth's magnetic field the same nuclei resonate at audio frequencies of around 2 kHz, generating very weak signals.

Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_field_NMR

Of special interest is that the NMR frequencies are now shifted down into the kilohertz audio range!  The H bias coil may very well be required simply to shift the NMR frequencies higher for more power extraction or less required coil mass.

Eldarion

Quote from: kames on March 30, 2008, 10:32:38 PM

Quote

...Attaining broad-band delay with wire is questionable, and should be considered a phase shift instead.

@aleks

Why not to go even a simpler way? Why not to measure the delay in distance between two pulses propagation?

You'll need kilometers of wire to have a measurable broad-band (group) delay in wire. 1kHz RF wave is 300 km long. If you want to cause a cancellation with two-way approach you'll need 150km of wire.

@aleks

Wrong.
I am talking about a very tiny delay. You still didn't get my point. My point is that a delay in a range of ms or mks is toooooo big. That is the point. I am talking about the delay that one cannot measure easily. That is why I said measuring in distance. And the delay has to be very stable and precise.
In addition, when an impulse is sent to the wire, there is no such a thing as broad-band. Check out the behavior of the inrush current before the magnetic field is established. Like a stand-alone impulse. It is a completely different story. Then read what SM said about the way his electrons are traveling.


Kames.

In addition, when an impulse is sent to the wire, there is no such a thing as broad-band.

Well, I leave this to you as I do not understand you, sorry.

@Bruce

Remember when DFRO mention PHI in his post.

 And take for instance my research into this feild showing that freq's that are multiplies of phi for instance .618 , 1, 1.618 , 3.236  are creative when hetrodyned with each other.  A lot becomes more clear. we were dam close well at least i know GK was going to test those freq for me .. I asked the poor guy a buncha times  ;D  Almost felt bothersome.. but i guess i was right on.   The other freq to mix should be in keeping with the exponet pattern PHI 1PHI 2 PHI
                                                                                                                                       Joe

PS Quick refrence

 1 X 1.618= 1
 2 X 1.618= 3.236
 3 X 1.618= 4.854
 4 X 1.618= 6.472      6.475KHz ...pretty darn close
 5 X 1.618= 8.09
Ect ect  ......

HOLY CRAP


ALEKS im glad you repeated his post i didnt read it but look at mine above and my freq table.... i think hes right on track and that confirms it.. wow freakin wow... PHI

@Eldarion

AWSOME FIND BRO PLEASE READ MY ABOVE POST

HOLY CRAP
ALEKS im glad you repeated his post i didnt read it but look at mine above and my freq table.... i think hes right on track and that confirms it.. wow freakin wow... PHI

Well, it's relative to H1. At the moment I can't clearly see a relation of H1's resonance, Fe's resonance and PHI*2. Maybe they are related, maybe not.